2
GameOnGlobalists 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been looking for this website for ages, thank you so much!

Do you know if it's still online somewhere? Some of the images in the archives no longer load.

Edit: I found a PDF version downloadable from archive.org. Unfortunately, this does not contain the videos.

Edit 2: This last archive before an apparent site redesign still seems to load the images.

16
GameOnGlobalists 16 points ago +16 / -0

Stay tuned for the smallpox variant.

9
GameOnGlobalists 9 points ago +9 / -0

There is nothing based about this traitor faggot.

3
GameOnGlobalists 3 points ago +3 / -0

So this is where John Durham is wasting his time.

4
GameOnGlobalists 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is the singularity I can stand behind.

4
GameOnGlobalists 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're spinning it like it's a symmetrical situation. In reality, when you "cannot possibly know" about a pharmaceutical substance, it is unsafe. No mental gymnastics will circumnavigate that sensible and long-standing default. By saying it was "good" (instead of saying "I don't know"), your doctor committed malpractice. And by asking that question in the first place with a genuine openness to being told it was "good," you demonstrated a lack of mindful discernment.

It's one thing to say you took it because of whatever belief you held or risk you elected to take at the time. It is intellectually dishonest to assert one couldn't have known better, especially as a member of the medical profession.

5
GameOnGlobalists 5 points ago +6 / -1

He said yes.

Here's the thing: he couldn't possibly know, and you knew he couldn't possibly know.

You should look for a new doctor, and a new excuse.

12
GameOnGlobalists 12 points ago +13 / -1

This a million times.

6
GameOnGlobalists 6 points ago +6 / -0

It is the Trump era, with the President in exile. The best is yet to come.

8
GameOnGlobalists 8 points ago +8 / -0

It is still the Trump era.

10
GameOnGlobalists 10 points ago +10 / -0

The post is a collage of the title lines of multiple videos. You have to visit each individually to dislike them.

2
GameOnGlobalists 2 points ago +2 / -0

Put your heart and soul into regulating your emotions.

1
GameOnGlobalists 1 point ago +3 / -2

We dont

"We" act and think as individuals "here." You may agree, or disagree, but kindly get your leftist groupthink out of here. Thank you.

1
GameOnGlobalists 1 point ago +1 / -0

You kept working for them after the Gillette commercial? You reap what you sow.

1
GameOnGlobalists 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dr. Berg is okay. I recommend Dr. Stephen Cabral for a wiser, more intellectually honest and multifaceted take.

172
GameOnGlobalists 172 points ago +172 / -0

Stay war-ready. Thank you for your service.

3
GameOnGlobalists 3 points ago +3 / -0

Short enough to scare you, long enough to have you forget by the time it doesn't happen.

3
GameOnGlobalists 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, there was one about Justice Scalia, too.

9
GameOnGlobalists 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm sure there is a blockbuster movie script about Justice Thomas lying around somewhere.

2
GameOnGlobalists 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you able to share the material where he mentions these regrets?

4
GameOnGlobalists 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do they cite a definitive study on shedding that I could read?

view more: Next ›