Their attacks generally do more damage, that is not something I will argue. The frequency of attacks and an accurate report of the “breed” are points that need to be looked at more closely. Shit owners that don’t keep a territorial dog contained, don’t train them properly (or worse, train them to be aggressive), don’t socialize them, etc...are more to blame than the breed. There are hundreds, if not thousands more peaceful pits than there are aggressive ones, but no one mentions those. Temperament tests have been done by neutral third parties for years, the pit bull types have always done well in those when they are raised right and not poorly bred by some moron in his backyard.
That’s not true though. And while there are far too many pit bull attacks most are due to a lack of training, socialization, supervision on the part of the owner. A well socialized and trained pit bull is less dangerous than a chihuahua. There is also the prevalence of inbreeding by backyard “breeders” that will cause any breed to have problems. Pit bulls just get more attention by the media because they are the breed of the hour these days. It was Doberman, Rottweilers, GSDs, in the past even though the pit bull has been in America for much longer than the other breeds. And they were used to mind the children for a long time. Keep them safe while the parents worked the field.
This is exactly why the left wants open borders and mass immigration. They know in the long run that they can’t sustain their population. They want to replace us with uneducated, low iq, wage slaves that won’t ask questions and will vote for whoever they put up for a vote.
The timeframe Jesus lived was around 600 years before islam was created. That is just basic history, not even getting into religion. The consensus based on historical events that can be proven, like the living kings of the time says that Jesus, the man, was born around 5AD, islam didn’t exist until around 600AD. I don’t give a shit what the koran claims, it is a trash religion that has done nothing for the advancement of the human race. It justifies slavery, murder, forced conversion, kidnapping, rape and pedophilia. Nothing it says should be taken seriously except as a warning.
Texas counties determine the method of vote tabulation. All the cities located in the blue counties have used electronic voting for years and not every one of them uses a paper ballot backup. It’s all electronic in some districts. That is how counties went blue and stayed blue, along with mass immigration courtesy of bathhouse barry in certain areas. There is a huge muslim population in the Dallas area. The Amarillo area had hundreds, if not thousands of “immigrants” dumped on them under obama’s reign. We also ended up with a huge number of those fleeing Katrina and bush’s failed response to it. Add in all the fuckwads from cali, ny, wa, etc.... Then add in the illegals that have stolen an identity and vote with it and you will have your answer.
This is where morals and influence play a huge role. If your morals are good, putting family before country does no harm. If you have global influence, putting your family before your country can cause major harm to both your country and the world. The ideal is to insure you family has what it needs to survive comfortably, then help your countrymen. But with greedy people there is never enough for themselves or their family.
That is a decent article, but it does not address the actual problem. During the time the attacks increased dramatically, what drove that? The early nineties was mtv, gangster rap, drug dealers breeding them to fight or attack, thug culture started to become mainstream and people saw the dogs attacking tires online or in a music video and went out and got one. They didn’t bother to learn how to control dogs, how to train them properly, how to socialize them, how to spot a bad breeder. They wanted a status symbol, so the number of dogs being sought exploded along with an increase in attacks. Most people don’t train their dogs to do anything more than tricks. They are not serious owners. I am not saying that they are not potentially dangerous dogs, I am saying that a well bred dog, raised well is not more dangerous than most other breeds. Cane corso, dogo Argentino, Belgian malinois, GSD, etc...these are all potentially dangerous breeds but are less dangerous than an untrained mutt when they are trained properly. Breed has less to do with it than most people are willing to admit. Negligence on the owners part has lots to do with it.