1
Gaylordgangster69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even then in AZ, out of the 15 districts, 10 still voted for Trump. Correct me if I'm wrong.

2
Gaylordgangster69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah. Even in the traditionally blue Illinois, Oregon, and Washington, Most districts are hard red and only a few are actually blue.

10
Gaylordgangster69 10 points ago +12 / -2

Trust me, once those countries stop receiving US taxpayer money as NATO payments they'll struggle to pay for anything and the entire European continent will be under a massive humanitarian crisis.

1
Gaylordgangster69 1 point ago +1 / -0

The whole thing is already kind of sus. There are a lot of questions that are still unanswered about San Onofre, and also about how California, instead of demolishing the plant, can just buy two brand new reactors that produce roughly the same or slightly more for the same cost of demolition.

1
Gaylordgangster69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh god not Bill Nye. What happened to him? He used to be so good in the 90's, now he's a dried-up raisin with science based on popular opinion. What happened?

1
Gaylordgangster69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah. Also is it true that once completed, it will be the most powerful nuclear power plant in the United States?

2
Gaylordgangster69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course. Tracitional reactors can be cheap, it's just that due to excessive overregulation and environmentalists, they're way more expensive.

1
Gaylordgangster69 1 point ago +1 / -0

That and the Soviet Kyshtym disaster of the 1950's which no one new about until the 90's. The only reason why people new about Chernobyl was because a Swedish nuclear plant noticed higher levels of radiation. In this disaster, what happened was that Soviet scientists dumped toxic waste into rivers, which not only infected thousands of people and killed off many crops, but the water also evaporated and rained on others, and eventually the Soviet government had to pour thousands of tons of concrete onto the rivers.

2
Gaylordgangster69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I love how these lefties try to patrol us over offensive jokes but here they are going full throttle with homophobia. Oh the hypocrisy.

2
Gaylordgangster69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well he does know how to cover up pedophilia within his own church, that's for certain.

2
Gaylordgangster69 2 points ago +2 / -0

And what's worse is that it got 34 upvotes. 34 UPVOTES. Are people genuinely this desparate?

3
Gaylordgangster69 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh yeah. Wasn't Hunter expelled from the Navy or Marines for failing a cocaine test? And probably even if he did make it in, he probably wouldn't fight at all because Daddy Joe would pay off the generals. He would just use his faux military career to gather in voters.

1
Gaylordgangster69 1 point ago +1 / -0

True. If he really cared about the environment he would build nuclear power plants and would pass legislation for nuclear waste reusal. But no, he just needs those renewables.

5
Gaylordgangster69 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same. The only good thing is the smaller more obscure communities. Everything else is hot garbage.

2
Gaylordgangster69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course we would. In fact, America could've gone 100% nuclear in the 90's If not for three mile island, considering that before the incident, 120 reactors were being built. Nuclear power plants also used to cost 1-2 billion dollars before overburdening regulations were put in. Trump should support a huge Nuclear program.

19
Gaylordgangster69 19 points ago +19 / -0

Always has been safe. Even with the nuclear accidents, it still has one of the lowest death rates of all energy.

14
Gaylordgangster69 14 points ago +14 / -0

They could reopen San Onofre. It costs way cheaper than demolishing it. All that really needs to be replaced are the turbines, and then you get a shit ton of cheap clean nuclear energy.

view more: Next ›