4
Gilliais 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup. Money for planned parenthood, to donate back to Ds.

7
Gilliais 7 points ago +7 / -0

Have you had your gun safety class yet? The one I took, the instructors had a variety of guns you could try during range time. They can also answer your questions about pros and cons of various models.

Good luck finding ammo though :(

2
Gilliais 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stay away from the southeast quadrant, fren.

There are websites where you can look up crime rates by county or zip code. Here’s one https://spotcrime.com/dc/washington

2
Gilliais 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t understand why Muslim majority countries aren’t making more of an international complaint about China’s treatment of the Uighurs. Are they, and I’m just not hearing it? Or are they pretty silent about it?

14
Gilliais 14 points ago +14 / -0

May 2020, Air Force flyover saluting first responders.

by geewiz
1
Gilliais 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly.

10
Gilliais 10 points ago +11 / -1

Maybe you’ve already seen that, Mr. User-name-relevant?

12
Gilliais 12 points ago +12 / -0

^ Asking the real question.

3
Gilliais 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why does anyone think this is going to embarrass Xi Jinping? I’m sure he’s proud of it. And if these agents aren’t shown the door immediately upon exposure, then the schemes will get bigger and bolder.

2
Gilliais 2 points ago +2 / -0

They always hype snowfall in the dc metro area. But the day before, the high will be 40 so it’s unlikely the ground will be cold enough for much to stick... temps the day of aren’t supposed to be all that cold either. Could be a great day to make a snowman.

1
Gilliais 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah. But aren’t they appendages to the Texas case, not freestanding? Confusing... and I’m pretty good at internet but have trouble with the SC website search function.

1
Gilliais 1 point ago +1 / -0

Activity on your link: all of those joinders, intervening and amici briefs attached to 220155 were rendered moot, I’m afraid. Parnell’s and Woods’ standalone cases at SC have not been ruled on yet, and there are some state level cases to watch.

1
Gilliais 1 point ago +1 / -0

^ this.

3
Gilliais 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought that too but it’s on the Supreme Court website. Heartbreaking.

3
Gilliais 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sending prayers!

2
Gilliais 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their fix would be to take control away from states and give it to DHS. Remember that’s what Jeh Johnson tried to do under Obama? And recall they got caught hacking the Georgia system, in an effort to prove vulnerability and to make the case for this federalization of state election controls?

If they’d succeeded, every state would’ve had dominion and its weighted votes, and no state would be able to sue another state over the fraud.

2
Gilliais 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or... if the fraud stands as legal, then let’s all change up the rules however we want, whenever we want. The plaintiff states could ban the democrat party from state and local ballots, and send their residents across state lines in busses to vote in other states that have no ID requirement. And no other state could complain to the Supreme Court because precedent. Lawlessness for one, then lawlessness for all. 🤷‍♀️

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›