I love your optimism.

And if we are the cult of Trump, as they say, I'd love them to explain what kind of cult member leaves there leader's speech before its done.

They think that so long as they play ball with the Democrats they'll be allowed to keep their cushy seats.

What is Trump's lawyer even trying to argue here?

The only time they find some spine is when they know they can't do shit.

Dammit why couldn't they have caught something actually deadly, like the cold?

Hopefully it gets the Lefty Cali refugees to leave as well.

How'd you take Pence's name off? I've got that same mug and really don't want to damage it.

Now this really put's a smile on my face.

Definitely a stretch no doubt, but man it's just too unlike how GEOTUS usually speaks and again its the verbiage you'd expect from the left when talking about the events of yesterday.

This video is way too dodgy looking, and the verbiage is exactly what the left and the media would use. It may be a stretch to say, and feel free to call me naive, but It seems like a deepfake.

Isn't there an incubation period before symptoms show? Meaning the both of them may have gotten the virus from elsewhere around the same time and not necessarily a case of presymptomatic spread.

If they cheated once they'll cheat again. And we've got more than enough RINOs in to make a republican majority moot

Not sure what good that'll do, it already passed with an overwhelming number of votes. It'll just have to get passed again by those same people and the veto becomes null

Lack of evidence itself can still be evidence. If data was wiped or altered that had no reason to have been, that itself could be evidence of wrongdoing, if what is there contradicts itself or other bits of evidence that too can be indicative of wrongdoing. We know what we should see if everything were above board, I wonder if it's even possible to fabricate all of it after the fact.

What's going on with the executive order from 2018 or the inspection act? Are they not going to used?

Nursing the perfect profession for chronic-fainters.

Purdue and Loeffler better have Trump's back I'm in no mood to keep supporting RINOS.

I can't think of an instance where Trump threw the first punch, he gives as he gets

The highlight reel would just be the podcast minus Tim Pool.

Nice just what I was hoping to hear

Question: Could the Supreme Court Justices appointed by Trump be required/expected to recuse themselves if the election result comes to them?

Its not a thing, don't know her name but this is a clip taken out of a larger convo with the lady in question, actual Hillary and Reuters

That seems unlikely, have they ever before had an update take the entirety of the site down fo nearly an hour with no prior warning.

Lots of sudden camera failures I'd bet.