1
Granite_MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not inflammatory enough for them. Given a choice between the old quibble over religion or a city-burning push on made up racism charges they'll have a deepfake of her saying hard-r n-words within an hour of her annoucement.

1
Granite_MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think Amy is a good choice now because they have had two years to concoct a backstory for their allegations against her. Trump needs to choose someone with the same level of pro-life credentials but leaves the Democrats totally flat-footed to cook up a scandal.

I would support her getting Kennedy's seat cause he's definitely going to be up during the next term.

1
Granite_MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

The person is symbolically going to supersede the Angel of Death queen of abortion.

I'm okay with it being a mother. Its going to spin the Democrat childless, bitter, lonely women (which is one of their most important support group) into outer fucking space.

Especially if she's attractive.

2
Granite_MAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whoever it is has to agree to it first and that's not a decision anyone can make lightly.

Their lives are going to be threatened. It may be the first SC nominee or justice that will require Secret Service protection.

2
Granite_MAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're going to go with racism allegations and then when the cities explode into flames they're going to try to pressure her to withdraw by placing all the emotional toll of the suffering on her.

4
Granite_MAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm okay with it at this point because its a tactical move.

3
Granite_MAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was just up there, there's Trump/Collins combo signs everywhere, which is interesting. She's heavily invested in the Trump voter base for surviving the Somali influx.

7
Granite_MAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Susan Collins has hitched her wagon to the Trump Train in Maine because its teetering blue.

She's going to go along with the nomination.

5
Granite_MAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, if it looks like we are staring into the gates of Hell in 2023 and still have the Senate I say do it.

Nobody is going to look at the ashes of the USA and say "Well, at least the patriots didn't put two more justices on the Supreme Court. That would have been hypocrisy!"

9
Granite_MAGA 9 points ago +9 / -0

That change was a direct effort to wrench away the check and balance against the people because "the people" are easily manipulated by their leadership.

For the US to continue as a Constitutional Republic, there must be a check and balance on the 51% mob. Lifetime Supreme Court justices and the original Senate were the intended check and balance on mob rule.

15
Granite_MAGA 15 points ago +15 / -0

Anybody have a version of this we can actually read?

I agree he was assassinated but haven't been able to find specific evidence outside of how he was found, how there was no autopsy, and the wet works email.

2
Granite_MAGA 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't remember that...I remember the glitter though, lol.

2
Granite_MAGA 2 points ago +4 / -2

Why wouldn't we want her on our side? Other than her still espousing liberal policies.

6
Granite_MAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can't believe we are at a point in this country where this is even a topic of serious discussion.

But, its an emotional argument, so its the only argument the Left is going to use.

7
Granite_MAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

I highly doubt Ruth said any of this.

I think that just like "found" ballots in November, we're going to hear all kinds of "dying wishes" from RBG that even she never knew about.

36
Granite_MAGA 36 points ago +36 / -0

I honestly think a pro-life replacement for RBG is going to be worse in terms of extremism than a Trump win.

They are all pretty much expecting Trump to win easily on election night and have already said so many times. They have told their base "Yeah, Trump is going to win on election night but we must count any votes we find afterwards."

Democrats with actual IQ's will also know that any conservative justice that takes RBG's seat will quite possibly be the deciding vote in whether any of their election fraud is allowed make this even more critical. We all know Roberts is going to side with the liberals.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›