Youtube is owned by Google. Anything with a corrupt parent company is tainted, everyone knows that.
There is a very good reason that the book of revelation begins with warnings to churches.
I'm terrified of wine Karens. They've got me shakin' in my boots.
I saw one that said something along the lines of "get ready for the darkest time in US history" or something in the thread. Again, conveniently ignoring the near entirety of US history.
The left's tactic is to call anything they don't like a conspiracy theory, but Nancy here claims the salon owner maliciously conspired to invite her in as some form of set up. Seeking to use it as some kind of slander or hit piece. She's by definition a conspiracy theorist. SAD!
Do a Trump and play the long game. Pushing too hard too quickly could lose you a friend instead of helping him. Patience is a virtue.
Here's another one that gets pinkos and commies frothing at the mouth.
"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."
Oceania was at war with Eastasia.
Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia
21 here.
I mostly had the same experience Trapped said here in the public school system, but the difference in my school was that my history teachers never missed a chance to call the Nazis right wing. They would do this constantly, to the point it creeped some of my friends out just how often they'd interject that.
her MAGA's only gettin' bigger
Clinton, Fauci, Obummer and Biden
Karen's on the attack
Check 'em fool, she ain't hidin'
M(an B)oobs
Double jeopardy is to stop from being tried for the same thing twice, IE you can't be found innocent of someones murder but get dragged back to court for it again because someone didn't like the last ruling. That's something the ruling elite used to do in Europe back in the day.
The kicker here is the original charges were dropped, they did not find him innocent or guilty of any crime, they just stopped prosecuting him. So double jeopardy does not apply here.
The Spartans in ancient Greece did the same. Just duckduckgo "Laconic phrase".
As an aside, liberals do excellently on social (notice the pattern) media.
Likes, up-votes, awards, retweets, hearts, all these things are to say "this opinion is right, continue to have it, have one like it if you don't already". They always salivate over how many retweets or awards their preferred opinions get on social media, it's a moral thing for them and it teaches young people to value opinions more than they really should, pulling them into the fold.
Office politics.
Slowly they worked their way up in the beginning, now they can work fast.
They began by making workplace policies that, while not directly targeting those that apposed them, targeted their general traits. Someone that tends to stand up for themselves and their ideas could get placed as "confrontational" (or sexist if they're stand up for themselves to a woman) and reprimanded by HR. Someone who disagrees with certain policies could be whispered about and labeled a bigot or racist if they don't want things like, say, diversity hires. They'll get a stigma attached to them and won't get promoted, while those that go by their rules do. They'll also require certain things like recommendations by others who think like they do, or degrees from places that instill their beliefs, to make sure you're "one of them".
Once they take over enough companies, as they have now, they can be as direct with it as they want because all the people with spines enough to stand up to them don't have enough power in the right fields to do anything about it, and if their is one coughmuskcough, they'll unite against them to ruin them.
With liberals you'll notice their strategies are in essence, very slow acting and SOCIAL in nature, using stigma and shaming to get what they want. Instead of standing on their own arguments they'll focus on making the other PERSON regarded as bad in order to discredit any ideas they have, even if those ideas are superior to their own, people won't support them because of that stigma.
Conservatives are very simple, much to their determent they tend to be direct. They'll call an idea or policy outright stupid or call someone out for doing something they think is wrong, saying things to your face, usually not thinking about if whether they'll receive a bunch of social support to back whatever they say up. They subconsciously think 'my argument will make sense and will back itself up', something liberals can't do with their socially based tactic.
The difference between a liberal and conservative is like a bar fight. A conservative will punch you in the face, very simple and straight forward. A liberal will back down to you face-to-face, and begin to talk shit about you to anyone who will listen, trying to drag your social appearances down so that NEXT time when you get into a fight, everyone will jump to their defense FOR them, they won't have to lift a finger. The mob is on their side.
Pence is at a boxing match with a front row seat. He gets to watch Trump box the lights out of every deep state crony that steps to him. When you go to a boxing match, most people don't think "man, I wish I was the one in the ring". You just sit back, kick your feet up, grab your popcorn and enjoy the beat down. MAGA
They wanted him gone because he wasn't a "player" in their game. Reagan fucked them up when he got in, pushing back Agenda 21 to Agenda 2030, Obama doesn't want anything getting in the way this time.
They wanted him gone because he wasn't a "player" in their game. Reagan fucked them up when he got in, pushing back Agenda 21 to Agenda 2030, Obama doesn't want anything getting in the way this time.
Capital i not lower case L, and that's korean.
For simplicities sake https://archive.vn/IbZkR
I do believe that's King Arthur Rider (don't ask) from the Fate series. So yeah.
Here's hoping Trump's gonna shut down DC and the arrests are gonna roooooll.
Regardless on whether those are american troops or not, It is ever relevant that Maduro has that $15M bounty on his head.
What's the sound 21,558 dead hands clapping make, Italy? Can you tell me what that sounds like?
If it's one thing I trust trump with it's our economy, and by extension, our finances. I trust he'll maneuver his way into doing something to get a chunk of change to help offset this at least. Here's looking at you CHYNA
At this point to me the question is
"Are you willing to be ruled by global elites in secret who've proven themselves disgustedly evil, or are you willing to give all the power to one man and risk it all?"
And frankly, that's hardly a tough question. I'd prefer it if we never had to do either obviously, but if it's only a two question quiz...
Lord help us all.