1:38:00 Asked witness for birth name, including spelling. "She gave a lot of information, I want to know who she is." (Is it just me, or did I hear a lot of hate in how she said that? And couldn't she have gotten that info from public records?)
1:40:00 "Why are we listening to your story today, if it has been judged as unreliable in court." (The lawyers point out that the senators claim is impossible, as she was never put in court - she only testified. The senator is getting his legal terms VERY confused.)
1:44:00 Dominion worker begins testimony. No more doxxing for awhile, just a bunch of great testimony.
1:48:00 "It was over 500. It should never be over 50, ballots come in batches of 50." "I don't want to hear about any problems. We are not here to run their election."
1:50:00 "They should be under oath" - senator. "I wrote an Affadavit." - witness. FYI, an Affadivit is a testimony written under oath.
1:51:00 Witness spells out what an Affadavit is. It was written under oath. She could go to jail if things go wrong. She has two degrees, and is a mother of two children. "I don't know any woman that would write an Affadavit just to write it."
1:52:20 "I have all their names, last names."
1:57:40 Some Doxxing brief this second witness begins!
2:01:30 "I've asked Dominion to come before this committee, but they have refused."
2:05:30 Senator claims that "Judge Kenny" says the claims are not credible, on account of a lack of witnesses. Witness replies that no, she actually has more witnesses behind her. The "noncredible" witnesses weren't even in the room, ie a straw man argument of the weakest kinds.
2:08:20 "My life has been completely destroyed... nobody wants to come forward. They are being threatened. Their lives are being ruined. I can't even get a job anymore." Applause ensues.
2:11:10 "I know what I saw. And I signed something saying that if I'm wrong, I go to prison. Did you?"
Okay, this post is too long, so I'm posting it as is. I never thought I would listen to a few hours of dry proceedings, but stuff is SPICY.
Conviction can be faked, actually, but keeping a lie straight is nearly impossible - especially when it takes over an hour to explain it gets explained months apart.
The testimony is chock full of specific times, dates, and witnesses. If this weren't true, it would NOT be hard to find coworkers willing to refute these claims under oath.
The opening post is 6 hours old, 6938 upvotes, stickied, and without a single downvote so far. The youtube recently passed 4.2 MILLION views, has 170k comments, and 326k likes.
I'm rather curious as to how many americans will see this video before the week is out.
If I'm understanding everything the first witness said so far, all it would take to disprove her statement would be a handful of her 80 coworkers coming forward.
Funny how now a single one of her coworkers (or supervisors!) has been willing to come forward under oath.
There are quite a few comments just posting the number of views and a timestamp. BTW, views are above 3.5m now. Likes are at 309k, dislikes at 12k. Last I checked with napkin math, it was another ~50k additional views every 5 minutes.
Truly historic.
She's on youtube, under "whatsherface". She gets banned regularly from all platforms, so don't be surprised if you can't find her right away.
It's kind of refreshing to hear from somehow who isn't a Trump fanboy, but still has enough common sense to understand what the swamp is doing.
There does not exist a form of training, nor any form of testing, that can predict how a person will cope with real combat. There are things that give statistical advantages, yes, but nobody "knows themselves" that well.
We just think we do. It's up there with our inability to see our own biases.
I'm fine with the masks, actually. Low cost, you can choose what kind of mask you want (from single layer cloth to face shields), and it shows courtesy to others. (There is some room for controversy, but most of that is fixed washing the mask daily - I do it in the shower.)
It's the "nonessential" nonsense that makes me mad. My favorite example is the WallMart Eyecenter deciding that "being able to see while driving" is NONESSENTIAL*. My only pair of glasses broke just as the lockdowns began. (I was only able to drive safely because my coworkers at Les Schwab did some magic with wire and electrical tape.)
Drove 5 minutes to Eyemart Express, got a new pair of glasses manufactured on-site the same day.
*Yes, Wallmart Eyecenters were still technically open - but at reduced hours (that weren't posted), appointment only, AND special emergency cases only, expect a week for shipping, can't order glasses without a current prescription, can't get a prescription without the eye doctor who is out of town this week, etc.
It's not like the Bible has a book called "Exodus" that is all about living on the run. Instead, it's full of stories like "David and Goliath", with heroes that never backed down from a fight - and certainly never hid in churches while fleeing an oppressive dictator.
2:39:50 Here's the drama you all asked for.
CA Johnson takes the floor. "As a woman from the city as Detroit, as a woman who... <blah blah blah>... my question for you, Mr Chair*... these people are sharing information... <but> no-one is under oath**... <making> allegations of wrong doing against the city of Detroit... and I wonder, did you see ANY cameras at the TCF Center?"
"No." - witness
"So, ... They are taking so much time, but I see no Detroiters there, no Detroiters there... but I have many emails, and there is no-one in this room, who you have to represent Detroiters... the <witnesses> are taking so much time... it's been two hours..."
<Bickering between CA Johnson and Mr Chair>
"Do you have a point of order?" - Mr Chair
"Yes. It is to put these <witnesses> under oath."** - CA Johnson.
2:44:05 "Every witness we've brought up here has sworn an affadavit as to all these facts."**
*Senators are supposed to question the witnesses only, and save questions for other persons for afterwards. They are supposed to keep all questions brief in the interests of time, they have time for further meetings in the future.
**Affadavits are under oath. Everything the witnesses said was already written in their affadavits.