by Evspra
1
GretchenMAGA1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kwame Kilpatrick and Lil Wayne. Most racist President ever.

9
GretchenMAGA1 9 points ago +10 / -1

Chanel, you have a run in your hosiery! You have to carry spares if you are going to be on TV! We have standards!

1
GretchenMAGA1 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was highly effective. I must immediately rethink my entire worldview and choices for the 2020 election.

12
GretchenMAGA1 12 points ago +12 / -0

Melania should have dominated every fashion publication and program, print, web, TV, or whatever, for the last 4 1/2 years.

All the SJWs whining about "body shaming" secretly envy her. That BS is code for I am a fat piece of shit and lack the self respect and discipline to look feminine and attractive. They give up, pack on the pounds, stop shaving their legs and armpits, dye their hair weird colors...and join Antifa or BLM where being part of a "cause" fills the void.

I could go on. You get the point. MAGA women are role models for my daughter.

3
GretchenMAGA1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Watch the Leftists critique every aspect of her outfit. I liked the way the camera followed her to the podium. Poise and grace in 4" heels! Every bitter, shitty Leftist will call that gender oppression, I'm sure, but I think it's awesome. What do you think, Iriza 100mm?

17
GretchenMAGA1 17 points ago +17 / -0

OMG, what a gorgeous suit! Matching Loubs! I like the military look--we are at war after all!

3
GretchenMAGA1 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree, don't leave. There are many of us who don't "fit the profile" but we still want to MAGA. What's on your mind? What was it about the post that bothered you?

3
GretchenMAGA1 3 points ago +3 / -0

"We really have to fundamentally reconfigure the way we go about our lives," Duchin said.

Seems to be a common theme, which for the Left means the Green New Deal, Marxism-Socialism-Communism, globalism, and all the fun that follows...

5
GretchenMAGA1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Isn't he wearing the same colors Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler et al wore while kneeling in the Capitol Building? Hmmm....

3
GretchenMAGA1 3 points ago +4 / -1

As I get older, I can appreciate SOME--not all--of the sentiments of Sheriff Will Teasle.

6
GretchenMAGA1 6 points ago +7 / -1

Great movie. What's interesting is how my reaction to it has evolved over 30 years. I was totally enamored and sympathetic to Rambo back then. Now my reaction is more nuanced. The character Rambo could have deescalated the situation multiple times. He chose not to. I get that PTSD is a real thing, but so is self-preservation. COL Trautman's character is also really fake.

Still a great movie, though. One of my faves!

1
GretchenMAGA1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough. I completely agree that a semi-auto firearm, pistol or rifle, should not have any restrictions, it's at the fringe of the definition of "firearm" or "citizen" that it gets sticky. Should every citizen have the right to a 40mm grenade launcher? The risk to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for other citizens might be at risk. A 7.62mm minigun? I don't have a problem with a Barrett 50 cal, because you have to consciously aim and select your target, but an M2 full auto? High probability of denying other citizens who are not threatening you of their right to life.

I'm being intentionally provocative here. I own ARs and support the right for almost anyone to have one. I would extend incarcerated to those paroled for violent offenses. To me, if you have the right to vote, you have the right to bear arms. If you gave up that right by being a loser, or never had it, 2A doesn't apply.

1
GretchenMAGA1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where I was going is that if you are a criminal--the bad kind, like a violent felon, your rights should be suspended for a time. And the 2A only applies to citizens, so while I appreciate the desire and need for illegal aliens to defend themselves, they don't deserve the protection of the 2A.

I agree that most types of "arms," meaning firearms, should not be made illegal in any way, because that would infringe. There does need to be a sanity check for arms that are not firearms, though. I could say that my canister of VX nerve gas is my preferred "arm" or that an electrified fence around my property capable of killing anyone instantly is my "arm." There is room for rationale debate on this.

I think we agree. I think.

3
GretchenMAGA1 3 points ago +3 / -0

2A for all law-abiding citizens who obtain firearms via legal means. I look forward to the day when we don't have to put an adjective or hyphen in front of the word American when describing our citizens.

3
GretchenMAGA1 3 points ago +3 / -0

WTF? How did that get into our country?

4
GretchenMAGA1 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Implied Association Tests are not reproducible, meaning when the same person takes the same test at different times, they get very different results. I don't know if they can be "gamed" though I imagine they could be, as the test measures response delay, supposedly to show that someone is consciously trying to compensate for their unconscious bias. So, I think you could falsify your result by intentionally slowing down or speeding up your responses.

2
GretchenMAGA1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thousands of myths, year in and year out

1
GretchenMAGA1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you. I think it's starting to dawn on them, as the riots become more lawless, that they moved too hard and too fast on this. But we will remember forever...and as soon as the economy recovers fully, I'm outta here!

22
GretchenMAGA1 22 points ago +22 / -0

Every Democrat tomorrow: President Trump needs to be charged with Attempted Murder.

view more: Next ›