1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

What a fag. I hate this guy and his stupid face.

2
GreyKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never understood this stuff. I do have a smart TVs, but I don have connected, it is a screen for my computer. No Alexa or anything else...

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t listen to Muslims. Full stop.

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I frequently cite Wilson as the second or third thing in a series of people or events that set the corruption of America after the civil war, but by far the greatest for the federal reserve and other acts, leading up to FDR, then Kissinger getting into politics, and Clinton reading nailing the coffin afterwards....man, hindsight is a bitch...

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wasn't aware there was a degree in "authroitarian faggotry"...

2
GreyKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

MGOTW types are usually divorcees who were nearly destroyed by the family court system or public attacks from the women and her friends or family. Another symptom of the underlying issues of culture and society, not the cause. Having seen women take their wedding rings off at work for years, and the number of people who cheat, I simply don't trust anyone at face value. That aside, I'm a single dad making $2k a week with the time and money to raise my son.

I don't think it should be the default, but you can't force women into anything. I can't find the story, but they would rather share one rich man bodybuilder between 4-5 women than a normal life. He buys them a house, car and gives them an allowance spends one week there while they get 3-4 weeks to do whatever they want. Insane.

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many syringes have a button in the middle of the plunger to retract the needle, most people withdraw the needle before they retract it, but some do like the video.

https://youtu.be/QpCxPTpnD6c

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Violence it is then.

3
GreyKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Their statement is it isn't about changing them, but adding some.

"limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, impose fiscal restraints, and place term limits on federal officials.”

"Article V includes numerous safeguards that protect the U.S. Constitution and ensure that only widely approved amendments are adopted. The strongest safeguard? Any amendment proposed by the Convention goes through the exact same ratification process as amendments proposed by Congress. It must be approved by 38 states. That means if only 13 states vote no, the answer is no. It doesn’t get much safer than that! "

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Either seems complicated. Most governments at any level don't represent us, and only a hand full of states are fighting back on some level. I do think states asserting their rights and a paring of the federal government are in order some way to rectify the situation that has been worsening since Bush senior. Demands as public demonstrations probably won't get us anything as we are shown as terrorist which seems part of their end goal anyways.

5
GreyKnight 5 points ago +5 / -0

I live so far away from everything, these fags live in cities and states thousands of miles away in some cases, some may be 500-ish. Everything seems so far away. It is clear they use this to their advantage to get away with it. I think a lot of people need naps, I mostly limit it to government officials, but there are a few outside government that come to mind as well. We all know they need to disarm us to advance their plans. It may be avoided if states fight back and disempower the federal government or simply do not comply. A federal tax strike with help from the states would be powerful. Should confiscation move forward. I intend to resist, of course they only need numbers greater than what they anticipate in encountering, when it begins, we need to spread the word and give as good as we get, and not surrender, or at least that is what I will try to do. I feel like people are only holding out for a last show of good faith from the remnants of our failing institutions, but once their mask has fallen and they order their hits, there is no other recourse or recovery from what they intend to do to all of us... I'm sure it would be some fucking odd time operation though... Any attempt to arrest me afterward will be met the same way, but I suspect my county is more based, but I hope to eventually move to a real state as I am in Cali for now...still a good county though, I wanted to fight to get this state back, but I just don't think it will happen in my lifetime now...

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cue the marketing of official lightsaber dildos and trans-padowan schools teaching sexual arts...

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

They were also in charge of kidnapping wretched Gretchen which got the case thrown out by the judge...

27
GreyKnight 27 points ago +27 / -0

Left: "Voter ID is racist, non-whites are too stupid therefore to get IDs"

Also left: "We can't stop crime, you can't defend yourselves, if your car doesn't auto-lock or you get don't lock it after getting back in from making a delivery, then it is your fault for allowing the crime to happen"

7
GreyKnight 7 points ago +7 / -0

The federal government, more specifically the majority of people within the federal government is working against the nation and people. Just like South Africa and other examples before it. Some states are resisting. The large scale and further smaller divisions of state and local governments has made it so there is not uniformity. Needless to say, while there are not that many people compared to the nation as a whole but I can't understate how many need to be cleared out of the federal government, and the masses of their legions and public outcry will defend them should anything be attempted. Either way, people are going to die in the coming years. Do not disarm under any circumstances. This is going to get serious over te next four years, I hold little hope, but all is not lost yet, or rather delays may come but it won't stop without a complete halt on immigration.

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wealth private donors. I would be fine with that, I guess they used the government to more easily distribute it, but that means it is costing tax payers in the overhead of that distribution, and I am not ok with taxes in any way being redistributed or used to redistribute monetary donations based on race.

3
GreyKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

They are both two separate problems that have some overlap... This can be logically explained by treating each as a separate variable.

  1. In the absence of democrats power, Republicans rarely repealed past unconstitutional edicts such as all of the anti-gun legislation, seemingly only a part or two of Obama-care come to mind.

  2. In the absence of republican resistance, such as NY or CA where Republicans can only vote basically as a ritual to show discontent and continue receiving a hefty paycheck, democrats never stop legislating destruction upon citizens

Yes, democrats and their terrible policies are a problem with or without republicans.

Yes, republicans when able to undo, stop, or challenge democrats yet do not are a problem.

The takeaway being that the government is flawed for relying to heavily on flawed people, and the federal government as a whole has become the enemy of the people and states.

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

What they are really saying is white men are collectively carrying nearly the entire tax burden...

2
GreyKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

-$800k home -"islamophobes hacking phone" -"muh mental health" lie (everything is MH because the believe it and then act it out when in reality they use it to justify what they want to themselves I have delth with real schizophrenics, psychosis and drug induced psychosis and it is nothing like what the LARPing public does) -"The bullies caused it" (aka victim blaming) -Not political (everything the guy communicates is mainstream political rhetoric) -References 7 mass shootings, but the only one where the shooter was white by location -"muh Gun control" right on cue, after ignoring everything they themselves just listed

3
GreyKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

...Didn't blame Abel, either...

1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

You need an ID and background check for every purchase of a firearm, and now ammo in some places. You can't even legally carry a gun without an ID. I already have insurance because people can try to kill me and then sue me for their injuries. Magazine sizes are already limited where I live.

None of this has had any effect where mass shootings happen where all of these ideas are already in place such as California, New York, and Illinois when 99% of the crime with guns is committed by violent criminals, illegal aliens, and most are usually gang members.

Ignorance of how guns are already regulated is not an excuse for more regulation...

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›