I am starting to think that for some of us who will be forced to vote by mail (yes, it happens in blue states) that visually recording our ballots, and confirming online if there is a verification option of the recorded vote, and regularly checking on that may be necessary.

I think some blue states may go red by a thin margin, and many signature may be thrown out or votes recorded for the wrong candidate if they think they can get away with it.

So recorded evidence of the ballot, the correctly recorded vote, and a possible change would be a slam dunk. The signature disqualification will be their likely route as they are willing to throw out tens of thousands of ballots. After the deadline, there is no recourse I suppose other than filing a complaint. That is if you can check if you ballot was even received in the first place...

Let's be honest, this is going to be a shit-show...so we must do what we can...

...we have been exponentially winning a cultural revolutionary war to take back our nation from the ground up with more people opening their eyes and joining every day...

We just keep winning, and I'm still not tired of winning

In various medical fields, there is a generalization called the 1% rule. Most of our organs have either some level of redundancy such as the kidneys, or such a level of efficiency that they are able to function at a level of more than what is immediately required.

The idea is some where after the age of of 30 or so, the general wear and tear on our bodies begin to exceed the ability to replenish itself without losing some function. This can be observed through various lab values through aging of people who have no real diseases, but their eGFR for their kidneys, increasing AST and ALT as their liver slowly declines. ABG, VBG, or arterial & venous blood gases may also start to show an increase in PaCO2. There are also other changes through imaging such as x-rays, CTs, MRIs, cardiograms, etc. which chow changes in the physical ability of breathing, vascular compromise, arteriosclerosis, atherosclerosis, and EKGs which show many elderly develop atrial fibrillation in time.

The main takeaway is that by age 50-60, the ability to compensate, recover, tolerate therapy, which is why many drugs have lower dosing recommendations called renal dosing based on eGFR, and then rehabilitate afterwards. You cannot dose a person like a 30 year old if it will make them blind, deaf, destroy their liver and or kidneys, and cause general toxicity and secondary circulatory collapse, sepsis, and death...once you start throwing legitimate medical conditions on top of this, many things can become unmanageable.

People don't want to admit that out advancements have helped those who would have died to live long, good and full lives and it has become the perceived standard and turned into entitlement, but that underscores the science, cost, volume of work, complexity of effort, and careful balance of factors that makes modern medicine possible.

We all will die someday. I am just tired of the democrats who seem to know nothing beyond lying, manipulating, misrepresenting data, demand or compelling actions from others, and blaming everyone else for their failures and corruption.