What proof is it that she sent MDHHS in there? I can see that MDHHS was there and the problem but I do not see evidence they were ordered to go there.

I didnt do a good job of explaining my thoughts.

Split Twitter into 2 companies: Twitter and Karen. New Twitter would be an unmoderated backend. The only things that would be taken down would be blatantly illegal things like CP. Karen would be the current human moderator system.

Users wouldn't be forced to use Karen as their moderating service. They could subscribe to a different company as the moderator, or several companies as the moderators.

Could the monitoring be open sourced? Like each person would subscribe to a blacklist (or multiple) that would censor tweets according to that lists curators?

Tuskeegee: Infect negros with syphilis to study what would happen. Oh, don't tell them either.

Spez: it is truly more fucked up then this. Deserves a proper read.

I don't know what PA uses, but it doesn't matter. It's an all or nothing deal. Can't cancel valid votes that were tainted with invalid.

Others are right, legislators likely pick electors. Revote for all other positions later.

I made an assumption about demographics, but my point still stands. People that join the military maintain the political beliefs that they had prior. The reason the military seems more conservative is because more conservative people join.

The marines that I knew from Detroit were mostly democrats.

Both. We are fighting voter turnout and not just fraud. If only Philadelphia revotes, turnout would be abnormally high.

Not surprising. The Military personnel are likely black, with traditional democratic voting tendencies.

At most they will order the election invalid. Whole state revotes.

Amen.

Marine veteran here, former coworker shared his m2 with a competing firm from only 50m or so. I'm not familiar with a more appropriate term than pink mist.

Meme this! Two scoops!

Urgent Meme request: need a scene from office space where they accidentally rounded from the wrong decimal place and are freaking out.

I should have said: The fraud in the cities does not affect house districts other than the host district. Fraud in other districts may require a larger amount than what can be concealed

I thought they censored him for what he was about to say.

Shitpost? Source? So hard to tell these days in clown world.

Would it still be anonymous?

Fraud that is tabulated. Seems legit to me.

Fraud is limited to just a few cities that already have democratic representatives.

It's not sufficient proof. It is merely a big fucking red flag that something may be wrong.

They have records of who voted in previous elections, and Michigan changed it so you are auto registered to vote at the SOS. They have plenty of data to see who is unlikely to vote.

Why wouldn't they have them prefilled out ahead of time?

My money is on less possible victims to challenge the outcome.

<firstname> <lastname> Obit

I'm passed that. They need to prove there isn't fraud.

We have the best shitpost, don't we folks?