2
HKMachine 2 points ago +2 / -0

The dumbasses made an electric suv and called it a mustang its no wonder they can't make it sell.

by Tesic
2
HKMachine 2 points ago +2 / -0

We'll see how but he'll need to release some databases to show 'whose' also been affected by it

1
HKMachine 1 point ago +1 / -0

No see, someone broke into his house when he was standing on a chair trying to fix his rope hanging from the ceiling. Something startled him and he shot, causing the rope to lunge around his neck and he fall off the chair from the recoil. Typical stuff, really.

1
HKMachine 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the info. Maybe my confusion is simply how could you not confirm you're entering your biometric data into a system if you're plugging in your fingerprint to be collected and checked and then sue for them collecting your biometric data.

1
HKMachine 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the only way to tell if it is their fingerprint is take a new record of her finger print and run it through the same system, right?

6
HKMachine 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Lets create an environment that actively hates patriotism and our heritage."

"Huh why is no one standing up to defend America?"

6
HKMachine 6 points ago +6 / -0

The biggest problem is they're likely not actually storing the fingerprint. They're storing a hash value seeded by the fingerprint itself. But it won't be worth it to actually explain that to a jury. They'll just most likely settle because what are the odds a hash can be explained to a jury.

3
HKMachine 3 points ago +3 / -0

And just like that, electricity rates will skyrocket.

1
HKMachine 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any blocking twitch ads at this point?

2
HKMachine 2 points ago +2 / -0

So naturally you have to pay $65 for a free speech permit? Or for a woman to vote right?

9
HKMachine 9 points ago +11 / -2

No clue about any other jobs or roles but theres a reason Twitter is on the top wants for anyone with programming experience. These are awesome perks but also keep in mind: Their salaries are not great for the place they live. Google pays its top software engineers 300k/yr and thats what it takes to actually get a decent home there, I'd assume Twitter is the same.

These perks are all fluff because ultimately its more cost efficient to have all these perks than pay salaries that it would take to live in the SF area.

3
HKMachine 3 points ago +3 / -0

How does one inflate their net worth by billions to enrich themselves and how do I sign up without paying the related taxes?

2
HKMachine 2 points ago +2 / -0

By their own logic they should have absolutely no problem with people owning fully automatic rifles because the government has access to even better equipment, right?

1
HKMachine 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fact is this is exactly the freedom of speech everyone deserves. But naturally only some thoughts are allowed because of intolerance.

1
HKMachine 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know nothing about why they ended it but having taken it, it was such a boring prompt that I personally couldn't relate to and I scored terribly on it. Its all subjective at that point.

1
HKMachine 1 point ago +1 / -0

That may be earned or unearned. So it's literally anything.

2
HKMachine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are they basing this off of Russian tariffs? Are they trying to say importing less but hiking 3x the gas prices is independence?

10
HKMachine 10 points ago +10 / -0

The Forefathers are antivax?

2
HKMachine 2 points ago +2 / -0

He has good judgment.

15
HKMachine 15 points ago +15 / -0

Imagine a world where you can be chased down, arent allowed to fire upon someone grabbing your gun because its on a lanyard and they dont have full possession of it.

A minute later you are being chased down, hit on the head and knocked down. You're struck in the head with a kick and arent allowed to defend yourself by firing on him.

And a second later Someone hits you broadside on the head with a weapon and you aren't allowed to fire upon him.

A second later, someone runs up to you, you aim the weapon at them, they put their hands up, they back down and you lower your weapon. 1. You arent allowed to raise your weapon to them. They're allowed to charge you when you lower your weapon, point their gun at you and you're not allowed to fire upon them until they shoot you first.

This is basically the prosecutions argument.

4
HKMachine 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why the hell was he grilling him about property that weren't relevant? He didnt take action. How is it not justified to stop someone from destruction with a threat?

view more: Next ›