Something something something separation of powers. Something something something checks and balances.
If the former Vice President has power over the Executive and Judicial branches, and former congresswoman Harris has power over the Executive and Legislative branches, there is no oversight to prevent abuse of power.
They should go clean slate on the entire voter roll every year and then you have to reregister every year. Too many dead people voting, people registered in two or more places concurrently, people registered who no longer have the right to vote where they are registered, registrations using someone else's personal information, etc...
If they're worried that non-whites are too poor and stupid (their words) to register every year, have it included with your tax forms since everyone who should be voting has to do those every year anyway.
So they choose to not require masks, their business gets shut down, they have no money and no job and lose their house and their family starves.
If avoiding that makes someone a coward in your eyes, you're a moron. When you have a family, you don't have a choice, you do what keeps them safe and provided for. A piece of cloth on their face won't kill them.
It would be a vicious loop. No one would work unless they offered more money, to pay more money prices would go up, higher prices means UBI would need to go up to maintain the undefined "living wage", and a higher UBI means no one would work unless they offered more money.
Depending on where they live, they may not have a choice. A person requiring masks because they want to can get fucked but if it's require masks or lose your business and your entire livelihood, I can't fault someone for choosing masks.
I know someone who permanently lost their when the lockdown started. We were all understanding at first, no one was hiring then, what could he do. But then jobs started opening up again, and he said no, because he really wanted to stay in the industry he was in before (which involved live entertainment and was likely never coming back). Then his previous job actually contacted him asking if he would come back. Surely, we all thought, this had been what he was waiting for and he'd finally be a man and have a job. But nope, he turned them down because he was making more on unemployment.
Right after that it looked like the unemployment money was going away and he panicked and begged them to let him come back after all, which they accepted... and then the government renewed the unemployment gravy train and he said nope to the job after all. So that bridge is thoroughly burned. I guess he's just a bum for life now.
But that's the idea. See, anyone will live off free money if it's an option. But they need people so dependent on it that their very life depends on it always being there; they need people who would be unable to ever survive without it.
I'm eagerly waiting for some industrious Leftist to start spreading the idea of Non-vaccine passports; a way to proudly display that you refuse to be vaccinated. That sounds like some low-energy bullshit they would try.
Are those percents of the same thing? Like, they're saying that with only 1 percent up for grabs, Biden took more than 3? Or are they different percents? I never understand half the terminology they use when discussing elections but I feel that's in some way purposeful on their end.
The media may be the only thing in the world that can lie to people every time they speak, and yet no matter how many times they're caught in a lie, the next words out of their mouths people go right back to assuming they're true.
Well, media and government but at this point how much of a difference is that?
It's a win-win. If they get away with it, they get to rub our faces in it. If they don't, they just present it as "wink wink, we all know the truth, but uh... mhmm we're being told by the big racist system to tell you that actually nothing wrong happened and everyone involved is innocent."
Both play to stoke fires.
Can you not read? It takes all of two seconds to submit the report that shows he died of a drug overdose and the "knee on the neck" story goes out the window along with any legal requirement to entertain such stupidity. Done, move on.
It doesn't matter if he could or couldn't have died that way, it doesn't matter if doing that was right or wrong because HE DIDN'T FUCKING DIE FROM A KNEE ON HIS FUCKING NECK. It's all a fucking clown show to distract from the truth. He overdosed. Open and shut.
Should have brought em. All this talk about "Muh Second Amendment!" but the first opportunity it was literally written to be used for in our lifetimes and everyone is too afraid of the optics and the consequences of legally possessing a firearm while you're marching on the Capitol to prevent a coup. If no one will use the right to bear arms, we don't really have a right to bear arms.
So if they had gone in and said he died from being shot 200 times, the defense would have to argue that? No, they go in, they say "he killed him by shooting him 200 times (or kneeling on his neck)", and the defense says "that isn't even how he died, here'sproof he died of a massive drug overdose". Case closed. You don't chase down whatever strawman they set up for you, you focus on the facts.
Except this is entirely irrelevant to the case. It would be more prudent to present a recipe for grilled cheese sandwiches for all either of these things has to do with the case. Can they prove he had drugs in his system? Yes. Can they prove it was way way more than a lethal amount? Yes. So why focus on how he kneeled on a dead man when it has absolutely fuck all to do with how he ended up dead?
So, are they disputing the fentanyl in his system, or the amount, or what constitutes a lethal dose?
Because if everyone agrees on those facts, there is no case. But all I'm seeing is everyone focusing on the kneeling as if that matters at all.
Would a person with any other mental disability constantly make their disability something my life and the whole world needs to drastically change to accommodate?