5
Hades440 5 points ago +5 / -0

Remember when the media thought they could play Johnson off as a British Trump?

7
Hades440 7 points ago +8 / -1

It does say it's non negotiable if it's requested. Where's the lie? So they didn't request it from you, ok. The words from their own lips say when they do request it from someone, it's absolutely concrete, you must provide it or they won't provide you with their service.

5
Hades440 5 points ago +5 / -0

10 x 0 is still 0.

Anything with any security at all is infinitely more secure than our elections.

2
Hades440 2 points ago +2 / -0

A baby can not have a father but have a strong male role model, or father figure, and it works out the same. Where are the statistics on children with no strong male role model?

2
Hades440 2 points ago +2 / -0

And since when does Minneapolis care about people breaking the law?

4
Hades440 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ironically, they aren't even bipartisan when Republicans do vote for them, what with them all being in the same uniparty and all.

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

i MaKe AlL tHe CoMpAnY's PrOfItS bUt My BoSs MaKeS mOrE mOnEy ThAn Me!

3
Hades440 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks like I better start flapping my arms, there won't be any airlines left that we aren't boycotting.

3
Hades440 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, but who decides who is legally authorized to work? There's only two options here; either this never passes because Democrats need their slave caste or it passes and then they weaponize the E-verify system, removing "domestic terrorists" or "members of hate groups" or basically anyone they don't like because bad people need to be persuaded to think correctly.

I realize we can't do nothing, but when you're up against people who always turn your attempts at progress into a weapon against you, how can something this obviously open to corruption even be proposed unless it's airtight?

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

Man, Delta's really gonna feel that one as they just pass it off to customers as higher prices.

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, are we for or against taking things from people who think wrong? It seems to depend on whether we like them or not.

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

A Republican isn't defined by the politicians, it's defined by the people. Even if all the "Republican" politicians are uniparty globalists, there's way more of us than there are of them so we still define what the party is and they're still traitors.

4
Hades440 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know the whole point of the Mark isn't to stop it from happening. God said it will happen, it's going to happen. The whole point is to not get it despite all that you lose for not having it.

6
Hades440 6 points ago +6 / -0

I fly all over the country for work. I expect I'll be out of a job before the end of the year because I won't be allowed to fly without a vaccine passport.

3
Hades440 3 points ago +3 / -0

Beyond biased, you say? You mean like if, for instance, the very company that committed the massive fraud were offering their opinion of the people exposing the fraud? Weird.

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bring that information to pol, and they'll have your covid camps pin pointed in like an hour.

However one would manage that would require the same level of access to the internet as going to google maps. My point was if they can do one, they can do the other.

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now watch as still no one cares.

When will we move past this idea that there's some threshold of evidence that will bring this whole thing crashing down? Hell, they could come forward tomorrow and lay out all the ways they cheated and swear to it under oath that they 100% stole the election and it wouldn't matter. Our entire government top to bottom, front to back is compromised and they're perfectly content with the way the election turned out.

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe I read Bill Gates was funding some related research, but I couldn't even begin to track it down again so take that with a grain of salt.

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

What they were researching was the mechanisms that cause the viruses to first leap from animals to humans

How can you be sure? It's just as likely that they were trying to make it jump to humans. These people have done nothing to earn the benefit of the doubt.

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to mention if you mutate human viruses, who knows who might already have an immunity. But humans would have 0 immunity to an animal virus.

3
Hades440 3 points ago +3 / -0

My theory is the vaccine protects you not from Kung Flu, but from what comes next. They inoculate all the submissive people who will obey and then release the real virus that will instantly wipe out anyone who hasn't already had the vaccine, no warning, no chance to change your mind.

2
Hades440 2 points ago +2 / -0

"The vaccine is just here to help people, why are you so paranoid and untrusting? You know what might help you to break down some of those concerns? I'll just start taking away every one of your rights and liberties and every piece of your life until you comply. If that doesn't make you less apprehensive about the vaccine, nothing will."

4
Hades440 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you have access to the internet to have someone analyze your data, why not just go to google maps and instantly know exactly where you are?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›