1
Hairyfreddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fake!!!! Stop upvoting and posting this garbage!

4
Hairyfreddy 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is fake!! Stop sharing and upvoting this garbage!

-3
Hairyfreddy -3 points ago +4 / -7

Your argument that this is an IQ thing doesn’t hold up. If it did then the violence/crime stats, unemployment stats and labor participation rates would most likely be consistent throughout history. They are not. They’ve gotten progressively worse as we’ve adopted liberal social policies. Read Dr. Thomas Sowell.

4
Hairyfreddy 4 points ago +4 / -0

No one seems to be questioning the autopsies, and most have latched on to the findings of the second because it aligns with what they saw.

The first determined death by cardiac arrest due to pre-existing conditions, drugs use and the conditions of the restraint, while the second autopsy, done by a different group, determined asphyxiation due to lack of oxygen and blood flow to the brain.

These are two completely different ways of dying, and obviously they can’t both be right.

How can cause of death hold up in court when it seems like this isn’t a settled science?

28
Hairyfreddy 28 points ago +28 / -0

The other day I asked a friend, “out of curiosity, what evidence do we have that the George Floyd incident was racially motivated”? You would have thought I murdered his child based on his reaction. And guess what. He didn’t provide any evidence. Just REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

1
Hairyfreddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, same guy. According to Wikipedia he “observed the autopsy” of Epstein, was the Chairman of the House Select Committee on Assassinations Forensic Pathology Panel that investigated the JFK assassination, and recently “performed an autopsy” of George Floyd.

He also did work on Michael Brown’s case, Eric Garner’s case, and a few others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Baden

Also, seems to have a bit of controversy as well, specifically forming opinions before looking at the evidence. https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/general-news/20070815/lawyers-spar-over-badens-testimony

Few more firings and controversies at the bottom of this article. https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/michael-brown-shooting/who-dr-michael-baden-coroner-examined-michael-brown-n183516

2
Hairyfreddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Couldn’t find a clip from this morning, but this is him from last night on Hannity. https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-dr-michael-baden-findings-020511020.html

5
Hairyfreddy 5 points ago +5 / -0

That’s fake news. The expulsion of Russians from the U.S. is different than the political sanctions Obama put on the Russians. Flynn did not discuss the sanctions.

6
Hairyfreddy 6 points ago +6 / -0

From Dan Bongino, “FAKE NEWS. The conversation was about expulsions, not sanctions. Those were separate issues. A real journalist would be asking right now how Flynn could’ve “lied” about sanctions if “sanctions” aren’t in the 302 or the transcripts? WAKE UP media hacks. Do some homework already!”

72
Hairyfreddy 72 points ago +72 / -0

These Joe Scarborough tweets are brilliant. The language Trump uses mimics how fake news media writes it’s headlines. He’s doing to them exactly what they do to him.

4
Hairyfreddy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Same name here.

3
Hairyfreddy 3 points ago +3 / -0

He’s not wrong! I was surprised he said this given how Kellyanne has torn into others that bring up her marriage.

1
Hairyfreddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

VyprVPN has been my go to, but it costs. Looks like they’re running a promo @ $2.50/month.