0
Ham_Sandwich77 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm pretty sure Mussolini, the inventor of fascism, knew what fascism was.

135
Ham_Sandwich77 135 points ago +137 / -2

LOL how hard could it possibly be to disprove the claim that someone was booed at a highly televised event that was also attended by tens of thousands of people?

9
Ham_Sandwich77 9 points ago +10 / -1

So what, no white person is allowed to win anything in February from now on? White people have to let black people win instead? And white people having to donate wins to black people is supposed to help black people somehow?

Jesus Christ.

2
Ham_Sandwich77 2 points ago +3 / -1

These are a great way to hone your marksmanship in your back yard or your basement on the cheap.

28
Ham_Sandwich77 28 points ago +29 / -1

Less than two weeks to find out if scotus has some integrity left or if all is lost.

It's not even a question of integrity at this point, it's a question of face-saving. How are they going to look if/when the dam breaks on proof of decisive election fraud, and they refused to hear the case?

Look at everything that's happening - Biden trying to push through as much executive action as possible while he still can (almost as if he knows his days are numbered). Time Magazine gloating about the election rigging. Democrats scrambling to try and impeach Trump which would prevent him from ever returning to office. All indications are that everyone involved knows the election was rigged, and they won't be able to hide it for long. This looks like SCOTUS is trying to get out ahead of that and not be on the wrong side of the issue when dust settles.

-2
Ham_Sandwich77 -2 points ago +1 / -3

This is not the way to go. You split the conservative vote and the Democrats will never lose another election again.

You have to primary the RINOS. It's the only way.

4
Ham_Sandwich77 4 points ago +5 / -1

Too many of these idiots think Hunter was dragged over the coals just because he's Biden's son, like the media were just attacking Biden's relatives for fun.

The Hunter story is a ABOUT Joe Biden and his international corruption. Hunter is relevant because he was literally Joe's bag man. And it's only through hunter Biden that these crimes were exposed (because he abandoned a laptop full of evidence).

0
Ham_Sandwich77 0 points ago +1 / -1

LOL WTF does that even mean? πŸ˜‚

0
Ham_Sandwich77 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's 200,000 job losses in January 2021 alone.

0
Ham_Sandwich77 0 points ago +1 / -1

Fox is the mouthpiece of the GoP establishment (i.e. the swamp), in the same way CNN is the mouthpiece of the Democrat establishment.

-1
Ham_Sandwich77 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Yeah that's true. /pol/ are unironic about their antisemtism. And they're the ones who created the kek flag. So to hell with everyone here who's saying "It's just s meme bro". Those people are a liability.

-1
Ham_Sandwich77 -1 points ago +2 / -3

They label us "nazis" because we do shit like wave nazi flags.

What did you think was going to happen when you started waving nazi flags? That you wouldn't be labeled a nazi?

You can't wave a nazi flag, and then complain when someone calls you a nazi.

25
Ham_Sandwich77 25 points ago +25 / -0

I hate to have to point this out, but the people who need to see this are never going to watch it. They're just gonna laugh as soon as they see the cheesy opening graphics followed by the "My Pillow" commercial guy and then they're going to switch it off.

This needs to be packaged in a concise, easy to digest format that you can shove in people's faces and which they can't help but understand at a glance. Because the only people who are going to watch a two hour amateur video from the My Pillow guy are the people who are already converted.

That's actually what we've been missing all along. All that evidence exists, but it's never been summarized in a centralized, concise, compelling format. Even "hereistheevidence.com" is basically just a list of news article and blog post URLs, which are easily dismissed.

-1
Ham_Sandwich77 -1 points ago +3 / -4

It's not about "upsetting the dems", it's about willfully embracing nazi symbology, and then getting mad when someone calls you a nazi.

-4
Ham_Sandwich77 -4 points ago +4 / -8

Are you kidding? It's not the left we're trying to influence, it's the normies.

This whole fucking thing is a battle between us and the leftists for the normies' votes. How do people still not understand this?

And when the argument the left is using to win those normie's votes is to call us nazis, you do not win that battle by fucking waving a nazi flag so the left can say "See? They're even waving nazi flags!". At that point I have to wonder who's team the nazi flag wavers are really on.

Like seriously "Embrace the troll"? Why? So you can get a childish giggle out of it, at the expense of votes? That's how you plan to win? By pissing public support away in exchange for a cheap "kek"? Are you people even in this win or are you just in it for a cheap laugh?

-8
Ham_Sandwich77 -8 points ago +4 / -12

I've always taken the opposing viewpoint that it's always been terrible, self-defeating PR to use a modified 3rd reich ensign as the flag for our movement. It's just way too good of a weapon to be handing the enemy. We should depriving the left of plausible evidence they can use to convince the normies we're "nazis", not handing it to them on a silver platter.

Do you really think the normies (those are the normies you're supposed to be trying to persuade to join your cause BTW) are going to understand your convoluted "We're just being ironic and trying to trigger the cucks" reasoning when the media shows them your modified nazi flag and says "See? They're nazis!"

Like there's bad optics, there's terrible optics, and then there's using a modified nazi ensign as your flag.

1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +1 / -0

No results are available.

Did they remove it?

-2
Ham_Sandwich77 -2 points ago +1 / -3

So let me get this straight - you think AOC lied and said she was in her office (far away from the danger) because she mistakenly thought her audience would assume her office was in the capitol bulding, and would presumably never find out that it's not in the capital building?

Do you hear yourself?

Just admit it. You didn't realize her office wasn't in the capitol building at the start of this conversation.

-1
Ham_Sandwich77 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Dude come on. It was a riot. How can you possibly be denying that?

https://youtu.be/aEGthdTzedk
https://youtu.be/lrmajCbjhMg?t=44
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPQuJrLTB-M

I mean support the rioters if you want, but don't deny it was a riot. That's just being willfully dishonest. You're not going to win any arguments by just lying and denying reality. This is the kind of crazy that makes the entire pro-Trump side look bad, and lets the other side recruit support. Next you'll be telling me Qanon is real.

1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +1 / -0

None of that makes any sense.

She said she was in her office because she was in her office.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›