7
Ham_Sandwich77 7 points ago +18 / -11

I don’t buy the accusation that she is false.

She lost me when she got behind that Germany server raid nonsense. That's when I realized she was a larper.

1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except Saint Nicholas was a real person. And he wasn't black.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Nicholas#/media/File:Jaroslav_%C4%8Cerm%C3%A1k_(1831_-1878)-_Sv._Mikul%C3%A1%C5%A1.jpg

2
Ham_Sandwich77 2 points ago +2 / -0

And on doing so based presumably based on academic performance, the school board is making a qualitative judgement about certain races. They're straight-up saying:

"You have to be this dumb or dumber to qualify as students of color. That means you, black and brown kids! Whites and asians, not so much. You're fine."

Which, by the way is true racism, of the calibre one would expect to find at a klan rally.

2
Ham_Sandwich77 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fact alone that a state will be subject to the presidency of the winner gives the state standing.

4
Ham_Sandwich77 4 points ago +13 / -9

Lets get real here. That's just a guy expressing sour grapes that his competitor has just re-entered the market.

31
Ham_Sandwich77 31 points ago +31 / -0

Anthony Fauchi? Isn't that the guy who's been wrong about literally everything so far? Oh and also the guy who funded bat virus research at the Wuhan bioweapons I mean "virology" lab just before a world-ending, bat-related virus orignated from Wuhan?

3
Ham_Sandwich77 3 points ago +4 / -1

Freezing in your home because the stupid wind turbines you put up to fight global warming filed?

There's some bitter irony here. 😂

1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +1 / -0

McConnell is great example of the swamp in action. You don't climb to a station that high unless the swamp has something on you they can control you with. This is what it looks like when two competing interests - both of which have the dirt on you - are both trying to leverage you in two different directions at once, and you can't just tell one of them to fuck off because you're beholden to both of them.

9
Ham_Sandwich77 9 points ago +10 / -1

Yeah it's disturbing how enthusiastically people are embracing this shit.

0
Ham_Sandwich77 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah the fact alone that votes can even be counted as decimal points or fractions is highly suspicious.

And while there could be an innocent technical explanation for why this is done, the fact alone that it's suspicious and makes a normal person say "WTF? Why are they doing that?" means it shouldn't be happening because elections must be seen to be fair. The perception alone of skullduggery is supposed to be prohibited. Everything is supposed to be transparently fair and above suspicion.

0
Ham_Sandwich77 0 points ago +1 / -1

It sounds like he's saying "Losing to Trump".

0
Ham_Sandwich77 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is nobody currently voting Democrat who wanted to vote Trump but were waiting for him to start a new party. People who wanted to vote for Trump voted for Trump.

-1
Ham_Sandwich77 -1 points ago +2 / -3

That sounds good but it's actually awful. Because that'll leave the new Trump party 30 points short of where they need to be to challenge the Democrats.

Anything less than a 100% conversion would do nothing but help the Democrats.

Splitting the right-wing vote is suicide.

11
Ham_Sandwich77 11 points ago +12 / -1

And just watch. The aide won't be fired, because we've entered an age of non-accountability.

Before, politicians (and by extension their staff) were ultimately held accountable at the ballot box, which is to say they lose their jobs if the public turned against them and voted them out of office.

Well that's no longer a concern now that election are rigged. They can do whatever they want now without fear of losing their jobs and it's already starting. Biden's people are already threatening to "destroy" the press for criticizing them. Because why not? You don't have to worry about public opinion anymore now that elections are a thing of the past.

Same goes for Swalwell. Just a few years ago a revelation like that would have for sure resulted in a resignation. Instead, not only does Swalwell not resign, the Democrats keep him on the intelligence committee. Why? Again, because they don't have to worry about public opinion anymore now that elections are a thing of the past and they have permanent one-party rule, just like their pals the CCP.

0
Ham_Sandwich77 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's a fortified approval rating.

3
Ham_Sandwich77 3 points ago +4 / -1

Officers are in charge of the military, and officers are as corruptible and unprincipled as any politician or business exec. The patriotism exists mainly in the enlisted ranks, and the officers hold the whip over them.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›