4
HappyPedeInCA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds like a peaceful protest is happening in here!

2
HappyPedeInCA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Two more upvotes to 1776!

28
HappyPedeInCA 28 points ago +28 / -0

Yep I’ll never forget her doing that — it was the final slap in the face to her supporters and the final proof to me that she didn’t care about the people, only the power

3
HappyPedeInCA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I think he misunderstood. You are both saying the same thing.

0
HappyPedeInCA 0 points ago +2 / -2

Sorry to say but maybe he caught it because you weren’t wearing one.

2
HappyPedeInCA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think we just need to enforce paper ballots and absentee ballots, voter IDs. And ban unsolicited mail in ballots.

And ban counting the early vote. I don’t know what to think about the vote counting machines and software.

8
HappyPedeInCA 8 points ago +8 / -0

I’m in California too! Tips would be appreciated.

14
HappyPedeInCA 14 points ago +14 / -0

One thing that seemed really weird to me was they didn’t seem to freak out that he was recording them, but they said they would need to request permission from their bosses if he could keep the recording, and they asked if he would prefer to keep the recorder on in the room while he went on a smoke break. I worried they would have deleted it if he had left it with them. Also the interviewer asked if it was his phone used for recording, I bet because he was concerned it was being backed up to the cloud. So it seems like they were trying to limit his control over the recording.

30
HappyPedeInCA 30 points ago +33 / -3

I also listened to the whole thing. I was surprised that the interrogators seemed less bad than I expected, despite how disgusting they were. They basically got him to specify that he didn’t actually hear the word backdating, but that his logical conclusion (assumption) from all the different things he saw was that there was backdating. They didn’t get him to retract anything from what I could tell. They actually added some extra suspicious things to the affidavit that I would imagine would help. For example, they were specifically told to separate out the late ballots instead of sending them in the normal mail stream where he said they would be postmarked with the correct day, putting them at risk of a changed post mark date.

But still it was very creepy to listen to. Especially the first half. I wonder if they are used to interviewing people who are liars and were too heavy handed with this guy who is a good person telling the truth.

13
HappyPedeInCA 13 points ago +13 / -0

I disagree. We usually assume Trump knows the answer before he says things. So he is being persuasive and accurate. What makes this place great compared to the lying media is people try to be accurate. So if the person doesn’t know for sure it’s true, then it’s good they specify this. Let’s not try to persuade people without the facts. That’s what the left does.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›