1
Haraklus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, it's stuff like:

  • Leftists permanent government officials getting installed while leftists are in office, and not getting removed/fired/replaced when Republicans are in office

  • Red counties in blue states and vice versa are a toss up on who gets to appoint who and where

  • Temporarily losses due to low enthusiasm for bad candidates, etc.

2
Haraklus 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a classic case of conservatives rolling over and losing voluntarily and should not be given the benefit of the doubt.

3
Haraklus 3 points ago +3 / -0

How are you getting this info? I'm having a difficult time getting live information on election day turnout.

2
Haraklus 2 points ago +2 / -0

How can we know we are 100k votes ahead, anyway?

1
Haraklus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude how do you figure? Colorado was pretty consistently red until 2008, and it has shifted more red since then.

1
Haraklus 1 point ago +1 / -0

One advantage of CO is that it's only VERY marginally blue. I live and work remotely in a deep red state, and I'm thinking of moving between Denver & CO Springs before the next major election to shift it red a bit.

2
Haraklus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrats always win the early / mail-in voting, and Republicans almost always beat them in in-person voting. It just depends on the how much each wins by.

Another thing to keep in mind is that this is voter registrations, we don't actually count early ballots. Trump has captured a lot of old-school, non-SJW democrats.

2
Haraklus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had zero hope for a Red Colorado until I looked at their voting history. Democrats have actually been on the decline there since 2008. They got:

~54% in 2008 ~52% in 2012, and ~48% in 2016.

Republicans bounced up and down but definitely haven't had such a strong down trend. In 2016, GJ took 5% of the vote. GJ + Trump combined would have beat Hillary.

If we assume that Trump gets the incumbent advantage, that there's less of a split for JJ, and that the Obama-era Democratic enthusiasm continues to fade, CO may actually be in play.

2
Haraklus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sticky this. We can make every vote count.

1
Haraklus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree -- as long as the other side isn't cheating. If they are, I'm going to cheat harder and better.

2
Haraklus 2 points ago +2 / -0

When we win this election, there is going to be a reckoning. The censorship and lies they're doubling down on are going to cost them.

Trump will have a renewed mandate, and start his second term with a loyal chain of command, whereas in 2016 he had to build one from the ground up.

1
Haraklus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I've experienced the abortion thing, too. It's definitely a hard line for a lot of people.

1
Haraklus 1 point ago +2 / -1

Jo Jorgensen is a Democrat, which means she's going to siphon votes off of Democrats. GJ was a weird fringe Republican, so he siphoned votes off of Republicans.

There's simply no way JJ pulls in votes from the right, though; the SJW bullshit is something that even moderate lefties don't like.

4
Haraklus 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can't believe DRUMPF had the audacity to steal 2016 from Jeb. This will be a GREY WAVE

please clap

1
Haraklus 1 point ago +1 / -0

WHEN ARE WE GETTING MORE VOTES WHAT ARE NH PEDES DOING RIGHT NOW

5
Haraklus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I thought about that, but registered Independent. That said, the thought of trolling their campaign staff is interesting. Maybe next election cycle I'll sign up for the blue campaign and then stump for trump (jr) with their resources.

5
Haraklus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I honestly think that they want Trump to win, but can't say so out loud or admit it to themselves, so they're demoralizing themselves to avoid being subject to the Blue Flush.

4
Haraklus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Plus, they think Biden is winning due to the polls.

I think the whole poll farce + coronavirus farce is going to be piss poor Democrat real turnout. BUT WE STILL NEED THE VOTES TO BEAT THE FRAUD

7
Haraklus 7 points ago +8 / -1

Norway and Sweden are not really socialist. They are welfare state capitalist countries. Almost all property is privately owned rather than state owned, and they have tremendous economic freedom -- they just have high taxes and generous benefits.

1
Haraklus 1 point ago +1 / -0

They also shut down all small business and confiscated that wealth, too, and commandeered most industries, only allowing actual private owner to remain marginally in control if they ceded all serious decision-making to the state. They were socialists, just not socialists as dumb as the Bolsheviks.

2
Haraklus 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are genuinely so lucky to have Trump that from my perspective it looks like divine Providence.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›