2
Harcerz 2 points ago +3 / -1

53% of Hungarians voted for Fidesz but they've set up the election rules so that it gave them 68% of the votes in the Parliament. (just above constitutional majority)

In the previous years Orban made sure that all the TV stations and newspapers are owned by Fidesz-aligned oligarchs so all the media is doing is shit on his opposition all the time.

Other than that the vote was legit.

1
Harcerz 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only somewhat significant strategic objective achieved by the Russians is the land bridge to Crimea (thru Mariupol). As you can see in the map Ukrainians are already engaged in partisan warfare in this area. Counteroffensive towards Melitopol could take away the only thing Russians gained there. They don't even need to reach the road by the sea, just get in ~30-35km range for artillery control. Russians have already lost more men than in 9 years of Afghanistan war and one day they will have to stop lying about it, hopefully Ukrainian defenders will cure them from imperialism for some time.

2
Harcerz 2 points ago +2 / -0

USA gained a lot of territory in Afghanistan but now it's all in Taliban control. Great territorial gains against Vietnamese nationalists until one day they pushed the invaders out. British had some great successes fighting against American nationalists too. In the end nationalists win becouse they place their country above all else. Countries get into serious trouble when there is not enough men willing to die defending the border from the illegal invaders.

1
Harcerz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ukraine in NATO was never an option really - occupied territories after 2014 made it impossible. Training and cooperation yes but not membership. NATO can only accept new members if they actually improve security situation of the alliance, not bring new liabilities. That's why Sweden and Finland will fit right in.

1
Harcerz 1 point ago +1 / -0

He started just after few days in office in 1999 with Chechnya. Been restoring Russian Empire ever since, that's why he's popular.

0
Harcerz 0 points ago +9 / -9

USSR collapsed in part due to failed war in Afghanistan. Now that they walked into another Afghanistan in Ukraine (lost 15,000-20,000 men already) US top brass sees it as a golden opportunity to finally break globalist "Unified Eurasia from Lisbon to Vladivostok" project and ensure Russia and China can't form equal and thus stable partnership.

GEOTUS wasn't blocking Nordstram 2 German-Russian gas pipeline becouse someone was blackmailing him but becouse unified Eurasia dependant on Russia for energy is good for China and very bad for US.

1
Harcerz 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's mostly 1, they lack support for 4 but will still try.

Turns out every institution not dominated by Dems is based on "white supremacy" and needs to be reformed...

2
Harcerz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah Governor Youngkin's campaign was being helped by POC liberal "Mama Bear" Asra Nomani who AFAIR was a prochoice Democrat but when her brown son got back from CRT classes saying that he can't succeed becouse of his skin color, she was pissed.

Youngkin's victory was a giant humiliation for Dems.

1
Harcerz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do people think that the majority of women want unrestricted abortion?

No country in the world is actually "prochoice". Whatever the woman decides to do with the fetus, man will be put in prison if he doesn't pay alimony. So women have nothing to lose with prochoice option - but some 1 in 4 women had abortions and many more stressed over it before the test turned out negative. They lose nothing with prochoice but have their options limited with prolife.

Now if the deal was "legal abortions for women but when a man pays for it you can't sue him for alimony" - then most women would prefer prolife. "I'll get an illegal abortion if I really need one, but my man MUST be forced to support the child when I decide I'm ready to have a baby".

Feminists will support rape victim paying restitution to the rapist as long as it's male->female $ transfer... They don't want egalitarianism.

2
Harcerz 2 points ago +2 / -0

In every Western country there are people who hate the government. Sometimes they even go on marches. "Fuck Joe Biden". "Fuck Trump". "Fuck [Boris] Johnson". "Fuck Trudeau and his father Fidel".

Have you ever seen "Fuck the Communist Party of China" march? "Fuck Putin" march? Maybe they have so much freedom that everyone is happy and they cannot complain...

3
Harcerz 3 points ago +3 / -0

The tweet is misleading. Full quote:

This request would provide $8.8 billion to the Department of State for economic support and assistance to the people of Ukraine and other affected countries, including direct budgetary support, as well as support for food security, democracy, anticorruption, cybersecurity, counter-disinformation, human rights, atrocity documentation, energy, and emergency infrastructure needs.

Further on the refugee crisis:

Over 5.6 million refugees have since left Ukraine, while an estimated 7.7 million people had been displaced within the country by 21 April. 90% of Ukrainian refugees are women and children. The invasion caused Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II and its aftermath, is the first of its kind in Europe since the Yugoslav Wars in the 1990s, and is one of the largest refugee crises of the 21st century, with the highest refugee flight rate globally.

Now you could say "We should give them exactly $0 for food." - this is a proper argument. "We should give them some money, but this is too much!" is also a good argument. Someone could also argue that when milions of white Christian women and children are in danger America should do nothing - to not perpetuate white supremacy. What if this whole "white people sticking together" becomes a thing? What if it threatens the plan to make whites minority in America? Leftists are already freaking out that help offered white Christian women and children is rrrracist. My argument is: since there are milions of actual refugees the money will mostly help with food and essential infrastructure, not info strategy. Yes some of it will be wasted becouse that's what government does, waste money.

There's also a reason why money is being spent here and not in for example Africa - long term goal is to weaken Russia so it can't be a stable partner for China and ideally turn Russia against China. Every time politicians talk about "human rights" they are really after geostrategic goals and money.

2
Harcerz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lviv may be safer than Chicago. There may be few hundred dead every day in Donbass though.

1
Harcerz 1 point ago +1 / -0

As Russia gets bogged down in their Ukraininan Afghanistan, Japanese see a potential chance to get Kuril Islands back.

by Blurkin
2
Harcerz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. Plus it doesn't have a noticeable effect on the number of abortions. No woman decides to spend 20 years of her life looking after a kid becouse she was too lazy to travel 100 miles further for her abortion. As long as she is willing to give someone few hundred bucks for it, people will do it.

0
Harcerz 0 points ago +1 / -1

YES! Finally someone is making sense! You know what "we" need to do? Let's for example kidnap governor Gretchen Whitmer. That'll make them afraid!

Who's with me, fellow caterpillars?!

2
Harcerz 2 points ago +2 / -0

You forgot the second impeachment. After we are all dead, children will learn in history books "there was only one president so unpopular that he was impeached twice..."

But hey someone took a dump in Nancy's office so I guess it's a win...

2
Harcerz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hopium porn?! The fact is Sidney Powell just landed in Germany where secret Dominion servers were secured by the special forces.

They have all the evidence needed to overturn the election.

Just need two more weeks to decrypt the servers.

PS Remember to donate!

1
Harcerz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Communist China is the real threat

Yeah that's the point. Putin's plan was "Unified Eurasia from Lisbon to Vladivostok". Russia provides security and energy, Europeans provide advanced goods, services and technology. Then they trade with China without threat of sanctions or tariffs from the USA.

https://lisbon-vladivostok.pro/goals/

With every tank that Russia is losing in Ukraine the probability that China will just take over Russian Far East militarily increases. And if commies fail to counter Russia's nukes, would it be so bad?

20
Harcerz 20 points ago +20 / -0

The Alphabet Clown Car is being brought down by the Ts.

5
Harcerz 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rejection hurts. Especially from a billionaire. She wants to... tax him... so hard!

view more: Next ›