If someone publicly calls you a racist, how detailed of an accusation would they need to make in order for you to win a defamation suit?
This shit needs to stop. Hit them in the pocket if you can.
Wait until he finds out that blacks owned slaves in the US, and quite possibly the first slave owner/slavery pioneer in America was a black man, Anthony Johnson.
Hmm, I wonder why the leftist leadership would like people to be financially dependent on the government instead? /s
"misquoted" is a weird spelling of "fabricated"
I didn't know biden was administering cuomo vaccines.
Dems: gUn R bAd. wAL R bAaAad Also Dems: surrounds washington with walls and guns.
Clearly they don't have a problem with walls or guns. They have a problem with you.
Mostly starving
The cat goes Mao.
I liked Candace Owen's comment on this. It was along the lines of: "Black lives only matter to white liberal politicians every 4 years before an election."
CNN level fake news.
That's not what Cruz said. Cruz is being misquoted and taken out of context. This section of the interview starts at about 1:13:20 of Crowder's youtube video.
Worth noting that in the same interview he was talking about voter fraud being a serious problem. In the past, Cruz also pushed for investigation into voter fraud issues related to the Trump campaign, offered to argue before the supreme court on Trump's behalf, and pushed for the supreme court to get involved. He's also been pro voter ID.
Just throwing this out there for those that maybe don't take the advice seriously, think it's okay because they have nothing to hide, or that it's okay because you're an honest person.
ANY info you give, even seemingly harmless info, could implicate you in a crime. There are potentially infinite possibilities for what you say to be used against you.
"I had lunch at X." -> The crime happened near X around the time you would have been in the area.
"Lizard people just escaped from the garage disposal." -> Seemingly harmless and crazy... but they have reason to believe the suspect believes in lizard people, and some evidence was found in a garbage disposal.
Biden prefers tater tots.
MAKE PRESS SECRETARIES GREAT AGAIN!
On his show today, he explained his stance. A little context beforehand: He did mention that he thinks what WSB is doing is hilarious, and has no sympathy for the hedge fund guys that took a risk and lost. He's also not happy with the response to ban WSB, etc. So in that sense, I don't think Torba's statement is a good reflection of Shapiro.
My interpretation of the tweet after listening to the show: The gist of what he was saying was that a market's functional purpose is to determine the true value of things, and that the market isn't "merely a casino." He doesn't condone what WSB is doing because he believes it undermines the purpose of a market. Alternatively, he's saying that many of those enthusiastic about it are enthusiastic because because the hedge funds are losing in a casino game they normally win.
I disagree somewhat with Shapiro's take. I'm enthusiastic because I think it's funny, and it has exposed more of the swamp.
How many experience points do you get for defeating it?
From what I've been able to find, he wasn't even charged. https://www.opb.org/news/article/sam-adams-seeks-comeback-against-chloe-eudaly/
I tried going all linux several years ago but couldn't. My 2 issues are the compability of videogames and hardware.
I'm curious to know what it's like today. Any of you pedes game exclusively on linux? And for non-gaming, anyone use a hybrid device similar to a surface pro? How is it?