32
Haz85 32 points ago +35 / -3

Forget the "4D chess", Flynn who I would trust second to Trump out of anyone was so confident Trump would win, this was only a short time ago

1
Haz85 1 point ago +1 / -0

I replied the second I saw the tweet notification from Solomon, so when I created the thread nothing had come out, hence the fucking question

2
Haz85 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not seeing a "foot long" binder worth of documents anywhere...

1
Haz85 1 point ago +1 / -0

Catch 22 though, admit there's no plan you look weak and you demoralize a lot of people

1
Haz85 1 point ago +1 / -0

Flynn and Powell too

36
Haz85 36 points ago +36 / -0

The theory is that these elites blackmail themselves in order to join the power circle. When they all have blackmail on themselves, they're virtually untouchable

8
Haz85 8 points ago +8 / -0

Remember the Wikileaks Podesta emails, "Didn't think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard" and the "movie script", with a map that pointed to where Scalia died

1
Haz85 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm hoping for the best like everyone else, but what's going to happen with all the die hard Q people who believe 10000% this is going to occur, if nothing happens?

18
Haz85 18 points ago +19 / -1

TANZANIA LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

1
Haz85 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really dissapointing that it looks like nothing of significance is going to happen in the last 2 days.

Strung along with "The plan" "We caught them, lets see what happens"

4
Haz85 4 points ago +4 / -0

For someone to keep saying "We've caught them all, lets see what happens" and "Stay tuned" for months/years and who can always back it up, we've got 2 days left to see if he can still keep his promise

2
Haz85 2 points ago +2 / -0

If this is all going to end with no justice, it will be a fucking travesty

5
Haz85 5 points ago +5 / -0

This isn’t Gab, it’s his Clouthub and verified

by SKnows
1
Haz85 1 point ago +1 / -0

So it begins.. erecting their fences..?

2
Haz85 2 points ago +2 / -0

TLDR: Ratcliffe disagrees with the majority IC view that China did not try to influence the election

"I am adding my voice in support of the stated minority view - based on all available sources of intelligence, with definitions consistently applied, and reached independent of political considerations or undue pressure - that The Peoples Republic of China sought to influence the 2020 US federal elections, and raising the need for the IC to address the underlying issues with China reporting outlined above"

2
Haz85 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm no dummy, but it lines up perfectly when I compare

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›