- Hating 1/3 of your fellow humans is OK and if you don't, you're probably overlooking something important.
- In a true democratic society you are permitted to hate 1/2 plus one of your fellow humans.
- in a Republic with intricate rules that cause swings of power such as this one, you can easily hate 5/8 of your fellow humans.
- if you hate 3/4 or more of your fellow humans, see your priest, guru or doctor. Lower blood pressure and change tactics, try to single out the 1/8 you know you can influence.
- if you hate every single other human being including your own children and children's children, and push numbskull ideas that will leave them in energy poverty and human slavery, diseased in the ruins of today's industrial triumphs, you are an environMENTAList.
Rights granted by revered ancestors who are watching over us from countless points of light in the night sky that are their campfires. Way up there and they got the drop on us, so better not cross them.
'Negro' was a commonly accepted term in journalism and literature through the 80s among sane people of all races, activist causes. And is still used today by people who don't put up with bullshit. United Negro College Fund, anyone?
It looks like she just kept trying to pull harder and harder (but slow)... then he comes up and grabs it tight in his outer hand with the cord loose and swings his arm outward so it jerks tight (fast). I think she can learn to do that if she starts with the cord held tight in her hand but sagging loose and runs away (using her legs to brace and gain speed before it jerks) and boom
love that video where ppl were overlooking a 'protest' raising their fists in 'solidarity' and multiple bricks come through their window
Raised fist, the question
It means, instruction unclear
Brick is the answer
HAHA variant turf wars!!!
Okay, here's the original 2012 challenge trial paper with the dead ferrets innit, where those given a SARS1 vaccine candidate showed 'excellent' antibody response but died horribly when challenged (infected) with the actual disease.
Pepe is inflating his throat sac after distant ancestors crossed with those of chlamydosaurus kingii.
At 24 frames a second no simple camera is going to give you a great explosion sequence. After the fireball expands inside bright light happens early, and 'soon' after the metal container is being burst apart and first separation will be at the weakest points on the top where there are holes and accessories mounted. So expect to see, if you're lucky, at least one frame where bright light is being projected vertically skyward from the new opening. In the visual confusion of this high contrast area it becomes easy to see outlines of objects (eg, missile) that aren't really there.
You've provided a concise and kick-ass summary of the points presented! I take a skeptical view of some of these topics. I groan when I see Benford mentioned because I don't see how it (humans typing digits) applies, just in general, it wasn't mentioned by these folks.
I understand when people get an interview they'll try to give a whole laundry list of stuff and now isn't the time for them to admit that any might be marginal, or a reasonable explanation has been fronted they're not yet aware of. But going down the list (replying to them and not you personally of course)...
[99.99x% prediction] I would hope they have plotted all counties in MI, not just those 9. While I'm not qualified to evaluate polynomial-to-the-6th-degree, I would expect the host to ask to see the couple of counties that had the lowest values plotted the same way to see what that looks like, and especially counties with values around the median (middle by the rank, not average) to see whet the number is and how different those fits look to the eye. And the median value itself. What if it is 99.988?
"Well... the voter rolls are really clean, everybody voted and BTW there were some same-day registrations that just happened to match census demographics." Unlikely as this may sound, it's an uphill battle to rule it out.
[Wants 'IP and MAC addresses' of machines] as if that would prove Internet connectivity during the election. Nope. IP address will be a temporary private/firewall assigned network address and NOT a public one. MAC won't help either unless you also ask for a local firewall log AND such verbose logging is enabled. Asking just for two blah-blah numbers is specious.
"We see a Taiwan connection that's been routed through a cloud in Germany." This sounds like crap made up for non-IT-aware persons --- from what observation platform? Are we supposed to believe either the Taiwan (or German) computer let these strangers in to become aware of the the other? This is identical to the poof-speak being fronted by Ramsland+HAMMER/SCORECARD-people who (I think) are decieving Powell. If I'm wrong, it's because it has been explained very badly.
[SQL console on the machine] is a damned good point especially if it keeps logs. But that is a failed-certification issue and the 'mistake' doesn't strongly imply such was used.
[Jovan offered $10M] instead of a (much cheaper) death threat? Says he. I think of trivial things like this because my mind is unQlike. Isn't that what he might say if he wants to be compensated at least 10M for his efforts? This is the guy who beclowned himself by conflating Internet-connected Pollpads with Voting Machines.
[Uncooperative Republicans] are still playing both sides and will until the day they are done. It's IQ now. Someone whispered into their ears, "There's no way to win with those Trump supporters" and they believe it.
[deleted operating logs] is a firing offense. Just maybe--- someone will try to defend their job vigorously by 'revealing' Internet connectivity or chain of custody lapses. But so much time has passed, I could have had a clean machine made in China and installed by now.
[Wayne county 'plugboard' totals] ? Even possible to disprove human error?
But anything that casts fear,uncertainty,doubt on electronic voting machines is fine by me. They deserve more doubt than even IT people can give.
Same here. I will even risk wrath around here to say that failure to help push through bipartisan legislation to officially end the war on pot -- may be Trump's ONLY 'real fuckup' in a long series of positive achievements and policy wins.
Specifically -- to the Reganite boomers and those who came after who frequent this board and cannot perceive the difference between weed and crack -- I say, a sincere fuck you. To those who were hippies in the 60s and 70s and considered it their sacrament until they grew into political Karens... , a double-plus fuck you.
In the Clinton years when Biden was going after Afamericans, weed was the main trafficked substance that fueled the cartels. Decriminalized weed produced and consumed domestically would have been a 'gateway drug' AWAY from serious drug use, to a more comfortable norm.
Zero-tolerance people suck.
What we got instead was a twisted regime where pot remained illegal, yet devastating stimulants and endless pharmaceutical prescription abuse is rampant. Marijuana/hemp prohibition was begun in bigotry and real racism, to target itinerant Mexicans and 'negroes' for easier harassment and roundup.
The football analogy does a good job explaining the 'uselessness' of specific antibodies. What it does not explain well is
- exactly how specific ones 'out-compete' non-specific ones
- okay, you made them 'bigger' on the screen to try to explain. How well does the bigness analogy hold up in real life?
- if this is true to the extent he claims, where is the carnage, the sudden and extreme spike in death that would result from 'opportunistic infections' of various types, from pathogens present in every one of us but kept continually at bay, suddenly attacking the vaccinated population?
- perhaps it is not a zero-sum game (one team getting replaced with another)
The prosecutors are the enemy of the people.
- "Using encrypted communications to..." in allegation context (https back end services in web apps) where encryption cannot even be disabled.
- If the prosecution was compelled to omit the word 'encrypted' in all indictments because it (encryption) was not enabled as a deliberate act, we are left with "attempted to communicate with..."
- attempting to communicate with an organization that is not officially declared a terrorist organization is a non-starter. (Short answer: only in Canada)
- note the deliberate conflation between 'radio possession' and the equally bogus 'encryption'. In fact there was no intersect with the Baofeng radios which do not support any kind of encryption or scrambling.
- the 'radio' allegation does not include a specific count of provable unlawful transmission ... merely possession. This allegation is so fallacious and specious the prosecutor should be disbarred for making it.
Trying to ram-rod military sounding gibberish through the courts for citizens who are engaging in protected free speech, mere possession of radios, and NO MORE 'exotic' use of their smartphones than any others who surround them... is legally offensive in itself.
Because it imposes https, Reddit is also a hive of encrypted communications.
Half the posters on this site are paid shills for Big Sheet Music ... just pushing it as racist to increase its popularity and trend it. They're trying to break into the market of Youtube's amateur Sheet Music influencers.
- Repeat steps 1-4
- Repeat steps 1-5
- Repeat steps 1-6
Cash For Clunkers 2.0 All vehicles without buttfuck spyware off the road. And just wait until they squish cell SMS (secret government number) GPS bugs in with providing "911 response".
It's hell all the way down.
- from here "in the days and weeks leading up to January 6th, Parler referred violent content from its platform to the FBI for investigation over 50 times, and Parler even alerted law enforcement to specific threats of violence being planned at the Capitol."
- In the announcement, they give no actual examples of those referrals, what they considered to be 'violent content'
- ERGO, Parler is the enemy. Either deliberately, or through stupidity. No diff.
You did a good job extracting the essence. When you are accused of libel/defamation the first thing out of the gate is your defense must prove to a judge or jury that
- your motive was not personal profit but rather, pursuit of the truth
- you honestly believed the libelous/defamatory statements to be true at the time you made them
- only then and only if no settlement is offered, do actual facts come under scrutiny because (even if nothing else) the judge has to decide who to stick with the court costs.
This is about personal motive, not the (eventually) discovered truth. Even people who were later proved wrong have had lawsuits dismissed.
I actually feel sorry for the writer. Maybe not trying to push white out front but realizing that all these (fucking) 'race' words suck. Black? Brown? Colored? Negro? (the choice until ~1980 and seldom objected) African American? ADOS? Hotep? Person of Overexplained Yadda Yadda?
They interrupt the flow of language because even for the 'permitted' ones one can recall some asshole context from years ago and you have to repeat to yourself, "Okay, that one's good for now."
I made up my own word, Afamerican so I can offend anyone who prefers anything else.
Hearing of books stopping bullets makes me think of termites.
- Cover: hole
- pp. 1-291: hole
- pp. 292-410: The Queen's Chamber, with eggs
- pp. 411-end: hole
Lassie did nothing wrong
P.S., Lassie was a Laddie
'Turf war' is spot on, and to be fair Trump/McConnell is one also. But it would be difficult to explain to anyone outside this forum exactly why the turf war is happening. Generalizations just don't cut it, the reasons hinge on intricate details surrounding January 6th.
After years -- decades! -- enduring people generalize uselessly about politics I was PROUD AND AMAZED at the high proportion of Trump's 80+ million voters who were completely aware of the Constitutional civics of State legislatures, differences between House and Senate characteristic and behavior (when so many Americans years past couldn't even tell them apart) and the intricacies of Trumps electoral challenge, and the gravity of Pence's action.
And the extremely high stakes for the country as the too-predictable result of GA runoff was setting in.
When the other half of the country was only force-fed touchy-feely crap that wouldn't even make a second rate comic book. Literally mind trash.
It's not influencers per se... influencers have 'quality' too and much is lacking. The younger they are the less you dare fault them if they cannot frame issues and present details precisely. College grads have trouble mastering that on the fly.
Up to date MAGA Conservatives do not just have 'positions' on things. They are also equipped now with specific 'judgements' of specific people. Whether it's McConnell or Pence, it went something like this,
- a moment is reached, and something crucial is expected to happen
- it does not happen and the reason why is a 'mystery'
- judgement delivered, resolve strengthened, sense of urgency increases
- there is nothing touchy-feely about this. It is evidence/action based
- because we were all aware of the details/consequences...
- ... we can all move forward in concert.
Don't forget the sanctimoniously smug eyeholes cringe campaign after Charlottesville, because Trump!
A Funyums onion snack has been sighted.
Priceless Jefferson quote, especially from a devout man who was trying to erect a firewall between government and religion in his time, to protect both from corruption. I think it was great that Reagan finally got the Christians out to vote as a bloc (after decades of disinterest) but now, ~2 whole generations past to see things swinging the other way with Christian faith being fronted here and other places as if it were some litmus test for admittance to the 'Right', it's gone too far. These people are figuratively shooting themselves in the foot.
I am a secular humanist and have always been, have been invited to attend church by many, which I have declined politely and always considered such to be high praise. As a conservative I share the foxhole with you, for my desire not to be judged for my lack of Faith (in any particular venue) by my own government meets any desire the Faithful might have to prevent the same government from judging them for theirs.