I'd say it invalidate's the bunch. you cant know which are good or bad, and every bad one you count cancels a good one. So youre either gambling on it affecting your election or calling the whole thing a loss. Considering the people losing would be the people who tossed envelopes, im sure thats just justice served.
TL;DR
estimated population of 936 250 Under 18 population of 26.6% = 249043 (249042.5) Voting age population (assuming 100% citizenship rate) 936 250 - 249 043 = 687207 maximum legal voters. 811,836 ballots received 687207 - 811,836 = (-124629).
123,629 underaged people voted give or take demographic changes from the time of the census til the election and the accuracy of the census itself.
Its the reported voter numbers for these respective candidates laid out in a graph based on what the leading digit in the number was.
People "think" they can make up random numbers, but you subconsciously have patterns and favorite numbers. This identifies fraud by taking the "random" numbers provided, sorting them by their first integer, and comparing the pattern of what a truely random dataset should look like.
No set is perfect, but these 2 cases form a straightup different line.
She's likely just incompetent