18
HosMoc 18 points ago +22 / -4

Idk why you think the age of your account means youre not a shill. Youre making excuses for a public servant NOT doing their job, then lying about it til the evidence was thrown in their face.

30
HosMoc 30 points ago +34 / -4

She could... go and point out that it's not working properly...

She also didnt need to lie about the fact that she didnt go, then quit once its proven.

It really sounds like youre shilling, pede

348
HosMoc 348 points ago +352 / -4

She didnt refuse. She never showed up to the verification. If they were tampered with, she wasnt there to see it.

1
HosMoc 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd say it invalidate's the bunch. you cant know which are good or bad, and every bad one you count cancels a good one. So youre either gambling on it affecting your election or calling the whole thing a loss. Considering the people losing would be the people who tossed envelopes, im sure thats just justice served.

6
HosMoc 6 points ago +6 / -0

Committing this crime may make them culpable or at least invalidate all the votes they dont have envelopes for

2
HosMoc 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trudeau wasn't re-elected. Stole it from the real winner with a coalition victory by having the other party bow down and kiss his ring to save them from the big-bad conservatives.

16
HosMoc 16 points ago +17 / -1

He didnt even sit on the fence on this one. He straight up dished out media narrative.

2
HosMoc 2 points ago +2 / -0

TL;DR

estimated population of 936 250 Under 18 population of 26.6% = 249043 (249042.5) Voting age population (assuming 100% citizenship rate) 936 250 - 249 043 = 687207 maximum legal voters. 811,836 ballots received 687207 - 811,836 = (-124629).

123,629 underaged people voted give or take demographic changes from the time of the census til the election and the accuracy of the census itself.

2
HosMoc 2 points ago +2 / -0

You missed it, I am pretty sure he was in here downvoting some of the earlier comments lol. Idk who else would have downvoted my comment about the song.

2
HosMoc 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess statistically at least one person will learn that Putin cheated by comparing it to Biden lmao

1
HosMoc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its the reported voter numbers for these respective candidates laid out in a graph based on what the leading digit in the number was.

People "think" they can make up random numbers, but you subconsciously have patterns and favorite numbers. This identifies fraud by taking the "random" numbers provided, sorting them by their first integer, and comparing the pattern of what a truely random dataset should look like.

No set is perfect, but these 2 cases form a straightup different line.

1
HosMoc 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a set of random numbers, you should see a curve (as demonstrated by the red line in both) and major deviation from that curve in robust data is a well known red flag for fraud.

8
HosMoc 8 points ago +8 / -0

His brother really did see. Like a pos though. I dont think he and adam should be in the same category

2
HosMoc 2 points ago +2 / -0

He seems to be of the opinion that they keep saying "president elect joe biden" so often in order to normalize the idea and demoralize critique of the election process so id say the former.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›