Trigger discipline, please?
Source please?
I stand corrected, he just said it in his speech at TPUSA; linky here: https://thedonald.win/p/11R4uehgG9/live-turning-point-usa-trump-jr-/c/ Go Matt!
I don't see how my opinion regarding Kemp at WH is related to anything, since I've been doing roughly the same thing.
Fair enough, but that's not what you said originally.
However, I agree. There are staff members and there is a list. How people are put on that list, and who ultimately approves it, I don't know. That is exactly why I am reserving my judgment. And you know what? When things shake out, I might well agree with your suggestion.
Every Republican was invited.
I wasn't.
Do you think one can crash White House party uninvited?
So is mine.
Was Kemp at the White House? Yep. Does Trump have tools at his disposal to prevent it? Yep. Did he? Nope.
Conclusion, assuming second premise holds (and I believe it does, but I am open to being convinced otherwise): Kemp's presence, with all his backstabbing, must have been somehow useful to Trump. Maybe in this battle. Maybe down the road. I have no idea, but one day I would like to read a book about it.
just speculation
Everything in this argument is "just speculation", ain't it?
Tell you what. You are entitled to your opinion. I am entitled to mine. Easy for me, since I am reserving my judgment until I get a clear picture.
His daughter's boyfriend is reputed to have been offed. Do you think that could have influenced his actions in some possibly imperceptible way?
In any case, I trust Kemp as far as I can throw him, and I cannot throw well. However, if the orange man believed that Kemp's presence at the party would be undesirable, I am sure he would have found plenty of options to block him.
I do not have any insider information. I am not a master of a deal, either.
...but I am not rushing to conclusions about those who do and who are. Especially in a situation when making a conclusion ASAP would bring no discernible benefits. We'll see.
Or he was invited to make a deal. I am going to reserve my judgment until I see how events unfold.
Hypothetically:
Pence opens the alternative electoral votes first, reads them out as votes for Trump and dares Congress to object to them. Now what? ;)
What IS the legal process for making it "officially contested"? I don't know; given the lack of precedent, I suspect, nobody does.
Since everyone has to play by ear here, the more noise we make, the more "officially contested" it becomes.
What is "officially"? We are in uncharted territory; precedent is old and limited.
It is as "officially contested" as we make it to be.
Black powder revolvers are not legally firearms. Just saying.
shows the cop addressing the actor in front of a building before he punched him in the face Tuesday.
Who punched whom? Journalism these days...
I will never believe that.
...he does not have any.
If the election was done fairly, why such resistance to audit?
Keeping fingers crossed!
That's what alternate electors are for.
Dunno about certified. Certifiable, sure.
Yeah, didn't make myself clear enough. Thanks!
It does not. Runoffs are happening in GA, EO or not. However, I am confident that if that EO goes down before the runoffs, federal assistance will be provided to assure free and fair elections.
Source?