17
HughGRection 17 points ago +17 / -0

Why would the executive branch need congressional approval for the reorg of a department?

4
HughGRection 4 points ago +4 / -0

What does he expect, exactly? Everyone wearing masks in public for the rest of time? Shut down economies at the drop of a hat? There's the treat that I could get SARS, and real bad MFing virus. Did that change the world? Why fuck no.

6
HughGRection 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fantastic pepe

1
HughGRection 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want him to admit what he's really doing when he keeps talking about it. He keeps talking about it because then it can't get buried, and he knows there are powers that be who want any treatment buried unless perhaps major money can be made of it. He can't say that, because they will play he for an insane conspiracy theorist.

4
HughGRection 4 points ago +6 / -2

Well, there's no fixing the divide at this point.

4
HughGRection 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was actually a great convo between those two.

1
HughGRection 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thinking they are when you are dealing with a virus that has an abnormally high rate of asymptomatic cases. Obviously when you are dealing with a disease like that, the mortality rate will be skewed and you need to understand what's actually going on. And I do question the method for figuring the total death number, but that's a different topic.

1
HughGRection 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you want to think about this virus in accurate terms, I think you absolutely have to account for the number of unreported cases, especially given this virus's propensity to be asymptomatic all together for young people. Mention both versions of the number. But given the nature of this virus, and the current social climate, I feel it's disingenuous to do what the people I responded to did.

1
HughGRection 1 point ago +4 / -3

Are you same person that was posting earlier and got banned or did you just get the same script? The mortality rate is not 2.72 percent because the number of actual cases is multiple times larger than the known case count. You know, the whole 80 percent of cases are mild or even asymptomatic thing? That's why. It's not a hoax, but you're not making the right inferences.

10
HughGRection 10 points ago +10 / -0

Except it's not. Known cases are known because someone had a severe enough case to get tested. The reality is almost certainly that the mortality rate is less than one percent because most cases are mild or even asymptomatic. I'll touch that topic all day long.

11
HughGRection 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think that's the real problem. I don't know. I have no idea what to believe.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›