Pretty sure that this is actually not true, according to Title VII employment laws regarding disparate impact. Link below:
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Disparate+Impact
Copy and pasting emphasis which stands out to me:
Proof of discriminatory motive is not required, because in these types of cases Congress is concerned with the consequences of employment practices, not simply the motivation. If the employer proves that the requirement being challenged is job related, the plaintiff must then show that other selection devices without a similar discriminatory effect would also serve the employer's legitimate interest in efficient workmanship
If the plaintiff proves that the employer's practice had a disproportionate impact on a protected class, the burden shifts to the defendant to justify its use of the challenged practice. Griggs labeled this burden as business necessity, but suggested that exclusionary practices would be justified if they were manifestly related to job duties.
Business necessity is the only known defense against the accusation that a personnel practice denies protected classes equal opportunity for hire, promotion, training, earnings and any other term or condition of employment. Three conditions must exist before business necessity can be asserted: (1) The standard used as the basis for the employment practice must be apparently neutral; (2) the standard must be uniformly applied by the employer; and (3) the standard must have a disparate impact on a protected class.
The term business necessity is a fluid concept rather than a bright-line rule (a firm legal standard that courts are required to honor without regard to the particular circumstances of the case being heard). In some cases, courts conclude that business necessity is established by showing a reasonable relationship between the practice in question and the employer's business needs. However, the majority of courts hold that an employment practice having a discriminatory impact can be justified on business necessity grounds only if it is "essential" to the safety and efficiency of the employer's operations. These courts contend that the mere fact that the employment practice serves legitimate management functions will not justify discrimination.
The Supreme Court, in Wards Cove Packing v. Atonio, 490 U.S. 642, 109 S.Ct. 2115, 104 L.Ed.2d 733 (1989), revisited the concept of business necessity and realigned the burdens of proof and persuasion. The Wards Cove Packing Company employed low-paid cannery workers in its salmon canning facility in Alaska and higher-paid non-cannery workers at the company offices in Washington and Oregon. Non-white workers filled a high percentage of the cannery worker positions; primarily white workers held the non-cannery worker jobs. The court of appeals found this statistical disparity sufficient to establish a Prima Facie case of disparate impact.
The Supreme Court reversed and remanded because the statistical proof the plaintiffs offered was not adequate. As to the defendant's Burden of Proof, the Court stated that the employer "carries the burden of producing evidence of a business justification for his employment practice. The Burden of Persuasion, however, remains with the disparate-impact plaintiff." This meant that although the employer had to show a legitimate business reason for using a test or certain job requirements, the plaintiff had to prove that he or she was denied a desired employment opportunity based on race, color, religion, gender, or national origin.
I hate to hijack, but can someone fill me in on this bullshit about how apparently because Flynn was pardoned that he can no longer "plea the 5th" or some crap?
Sounds like sheer clown world lunacy that getting pardoned would strip you of constitutional protections in a future case, even if they were somewhat relevant.
You should feel backstabbed, especially if you've seen the original commercial.
We were literally pandered to. I'm not from Georgia, but I remember seeing this guy's commercial and thought he would be fantastic. What a surprise that he cucked just like the rest.
I really feel for you. It must suck being born such a gigantic faggot.
Not gonna lie, sometimes this shit stresses me out too. However, I don't post any doubtful thoughts here on account of the fact that we all need to be as high energy and positive as we can. I trust and pray that the people handling the situation at Trump's behest (in addition to Trump himself) are going to be able to get to the bottom of this stolen election.
There really isn't any other reasonable alternative.
Reddit has a problem with longtime accounts being bought and sold for astroturfing purposes. A handful of these accounts are very likely sock puppets that were purposefully aged months ago for this very moment.
If they have a high comment score, post score and age date -- yet espouse MSM talking points -- they are likely shills hoping people will ignore their surface arguments in favor of how long they have been around here.
It's a combination of people being tense and us being infiltrated. You better absolutely believe that the Democrats/CCP have sock puppets in here trying to demoralize Trump's base in addition to obfuscating any positive relevant news.
I also think she's a Marxist,
He had me going in the first half. I'm open to controversial opinions if they are reasonable,
entirely based on the fact that only a Marxist white woman would adopt black children, and foreigners too.
but this shit was straight out of bat country.
I have no reason to think she is a "Fraud" like the media is trying to label her but she needs to put up her evidence pronto and not just in court. If its as as biblical as she claims then the public has a right to see it.
I really can't help but think you people are shills when you say this shit. You go through the process of espousing trust in Sidney Powell, then follow it up with an expression of doubt + mainstream media talking points. It's almost always in this same order every time I see it.
What's also crazy to me is your post score, comment score, and age date. You've clearly been here a while and made a lot of posts, so I don't understand where this doubt is coming from. Have you not been paying attention at all the past few weeks? The presence of voter fraud is apparent even without Sidney Powell's smoking guns being available to the public. Further, I am sure it will all become available to the public once the lawsuits have gone through the proper litigation.
Comments like yours make me wonder if, like Reddit, we have been infiltrated by leftists who are building accounts with long standing so that they can be sold to Democrat shill campaigns in order to demoralize. On that note, you might want to consider contacting your handler for a better script.
I think it's more hilarious he wasn't voted for Treasury. Shows what they think about his economic policies 🤣
I literally did a double-take.
Also LOL Bernie wasn't voted as Treasury Secretary. Where the hell did people get the idea to vote for him as Defense Secretary? Doesn't make any sense.
If you're having problems getting through to them, cancel through your bank/card carrier.
You faggots are honestly such losers.
This thread and title are fucking weird.
FIVE RALLIES TODAY?!?
HOLY MOLEY THE ENERGY!!!!
Some bullshit that the Dims have been trying to trick Republicans in different states.
In my family's state, they had someone in 2018 running for governor as a "Conservative Democrat."
I thought the exact same thing: "What the fuck is a Conservative Democrat??"
I'm concerned this may be the hail mary play. If Ben Sasse and Mitt Romney are possibly willing to vote No on ACB, then the Democrats only need a couple clinch votes to ensure she doesn't get nominated. If the Republican Senate can't secure a nomination for ACB just 2 weeks before the election, I could see it demoralizing a lot of the voter base into not showing up on November 3rd across multiple states, and that could swing the electoral college.
I watched over 20 hours each of both the Kavanaugh and ACB nomination hearings. Between the two, Democrats were by far more disruptive during the Kavanaugh hearings. Remember two years ago how many protesters had to be escorted out on the first day, during the first hour? I personally counted over 30 individual disruptions. Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and Blumenthal specifically spoke over Grassley -- out of turn -- and demanded a vote to disband the hearings. We didn't see any of that this year with ACB. All the Democrats really did was they made their litigant point on the Affordable Care Act and questioned her ability to be impartial regarding any cases that arose with regard to the ACA or Trump and the election. That could be because they're somewhat confident that she's not going to get nominated in the first place. I'm not 100% certain, but it's just a thought that I wanted to get out here.
This is my absolute favorite conspiracy.
Even if the Big Mike memes aren't true, you just have to wonder why they would pretend to be married and use someone else's kids.
In 1864,
I was timing the majority of the responses with a stop watch and the moderator was giving 10-15 extra seconds to Kamala while simultaneously subtracting 10-15 seconds from Pence.
Someone on the Discord timed the moderator cutting Pence off early on AFTER 49 SECONDS. LESS THAN A FUCKING MINUTE.
Susan Page is a fucking Democrat hack.
First question already based on a false pretense lmfao
Legality of laws issued by either the executive branch or the legislative branch do not matter if the judicial branch does not hold them accountable.
EG: Until someone files a lawsuit against the state of NY and it reaches the NY Supreme Court or the federal Supreme Court, Cuomo and the NY House can pass what ever fucking law they want to without reprisal.
I was about to ask if you had a link to the primary source and holy shit you delivered. Fucking bravo.
He edited that in after I made my post, dude.