3
Icetor 3 points ago +3 / -0

AFAIK the tech billionaires haven't actually been put under oath when they've testified. how convenient for them since they've been lying their asses off.

1
Icetor 1 point ago +1 / -0

We'll suspend counting for 4 hours and all of the votes we find will be 85% for the republican candidates until we have enough to win. 700% voter turnout out is the key.

111
Icetor 111 points ago +111 / -0

Corn cob was one bad dude back when Joe lived in the racial jungles.

1
Icetor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wouldn't it be Xio? Xio Bai Deng

1
Icetor 1 point ago +1 / -0

In my opinion, election meddling should be tantamount to treason. The only reason the peaceful transfer of power functions is the idea that elections are fair. If elections have no meaning, might as well scrap the country and start over. OF. BY. AND FOR. THE PEOPLE.

9
Icetor 9 points ago +10 / -1

It's not conservative vs leftist. It's independent vs corporate. It's ethical, legitimate vs "i can read a script, what are facts?"

1
Icetor 1 point ago +1 / -0

No matter how the wind (sniff) blows, the mountain can not bow to it.

5
Icetor 5 points ago +5 / -0

If this was the most secure election in history, who the fuck won all those other cycles? JFC there's enough "irregularities" that if this was the private sector, every person involved in MI, WI, PA, AZ, NV, GA, and potentially VA would be updating their CVs and praying that nobody called their previous employer for a recommendation.

32
Icetor 32 points ago +32 / -0

She shouldn't have to be partisan to side against Philadelphia. Any SCOTUS justice should 100% have a problem with how badly PA screwed with proper electoral procedures. It should be a 9-0 decision for at LEAST a full audit, if not a dismissal of every single vote tabulated after Alito's court order was issued. Why are dem partisans so awful at upholding basic standards of integrity??

1
Icetor 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is it not a federal crime to destroy any documentation relating to votes prior to certification? And doubly if there's any significant legal action taking place to contest the vote?

2
Icetor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't be an ideologue, leave that to Legacy Media viewers who have no capacity to see anything not pointed out to them by a pundit. Obviously if the system works in a just manner Trump will win. That said, if he ends up cheated out of the election, the idea that he should pretend it was a fair process is the height of delusion at this point.

There's a reason everyone declared Biden "president-elect". It's to pressure the legal system with threats of violent riots, billions of dollars of property damage, and lists of wrongthinkers the instant leftists get control of anything. Hopefully enough people in the process will be incorruptible to get legitimate votes. I'm not going to base my future plans on the hope that the "Justice" system is just.

35
Icetor 35 points ago +35 / -0

Anderosn (XD): In order to prosecute fraud cases you have to start by having overwhelming proof that fraud occurred, therefore Trump shouldn't be allowed to have access to the records that contain the proof of fraud, because they don't already have that proof.

^Dem reasoning at its finest.

10
Icetor 10 points ago +10 / -0

Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

18
Icetor 18 points ago +18 / -0

To be honest, I'd give the democrats a choice.

  1. All votes that were counted after the ridiculous suspension are invalidated and the results up til then decides all races. or
  2. States that suspended the count have another election now that the pandemic is over, and there are like 3 days of in person, verified do-over, and the threshold for shenanigans is ZERO. Shape up or ship out.
1
Icetor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Behold, the low information voter. Look upon her and realize that in the past she's claimed that conservatives don't know what the issues are.

1
Icetor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Confirmations have consequences, Joe.

1
Icetor 1 point ago +1 / -0

For what it's worth, I contacted both my state representative and state senator with pleas to support transparency.

2
Icetor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any amount of votes that were submitted without oversight, either due to refusing to let poll watchers in, or waiting for them to leave then tabulating more, need to be invalidated. If you had nothing to hide, you had no reason to hide it.

view more: Next ›