Apparently A-OK Fine...

Talking about hurting women if they need the money and getting off on human misery

r/AbusePorn2 r/fuckmeat r/analgape r/roughanal r/PainBDSM r/pain r/painal r/slapping r/SexWithHookers r/prostitutes r/Misogynyfetish r/misogyny

Talking about turning women's insides into their outsides.

r/prolapse r/ProlapseGifs Let's talk about the ability to consent r/DrunkGirls Let's talk about eating literal shit r/Coprophiles r/ScatPorn2 r/scatfetish

Talking about huffing VHS head cleaner and jacking off r/popperpigs

Talking about when it is and isn't okay to say the n-word (protip: when you've got a boner it's okay) r/raceplay

Talking about recreational drugs and addiction and glorifying drug culture and creating communities around illegal substances. Also, sourcing illegal substances in the PM's. The lengths people will go to to keep up a drug habit and the crime involved that often destroys families, communities, and lives is also acceptable

r/Drugs r/DrugStashes r/heroin r/cocaine r/meth r/Stims r/opiates

Making poor choices while on those drugs? Also 100% fine.... r/opiates_gonewild r/cocainegonewild r/fuckingtweakers

Communities that are still about illegal drug use under the delusion that they're actually about medicine. Unqualified medical advice is apparently super duper cool!

r/steroids r/steroidsourcetalk3 r/steroidsxx r/steroidforum r/TransDIY

Self harm? We got you covered!

r/selfharm r/SelfHarmScars r/Cutters

Wrecking homes and ruining lives? Let's talk about that well known r/relationship_advice thread about a woman who was confronted about an affair and killed her whole fucking family and herself.

r/adultery r/Affairs r/Cheaters Let's talk about empowerment vs exploitation r/SexWorkers r/SexWorkersOnly r/SexWorkersCringe r/ClientCringe

Let's talk about why all these redditors really post naked pictures of themselves and how it's not just about karma.

r/SexclusiveSelling r/FetishSelling r/Sexsells r/redditamateurvids r/pantysellers r/pantydrawer r/Panties4Sale r/SellerCircleStage r/sexting r/SkypeShows

Oh and while we're talking about that, let's talk about the team at reddit that verifies the age of all those amateur porn models in the hundreds of "gone wild" subs. (Hint: there isn't one)

So as you can see, reddit is a diverse community of misogynists, porn addicts, cutters, whores, drug addicts, drug dealers, literal shit eaters, and just all round degenerates and hypocrites.

And you don't belong here because you're a bunch of meanies who support the wrong presidential candidate.

Everything goes in cycles. The Greeks and Romans got to this point of degeneracy, empires collapse, new empires are created. Don't forget that the Caliphates, Imperial China, Roman Empire, Mongols, etc. where once spanning all across our lands and would have seen to be impossible to destroy. Where are they now? Only old ruins remain.

More proof we are almost reaching Weimar levels of degeneracy and we all know what the backlash to this mess produces.

Now lets get this list of degenerate bullshit to the top, if those subs go away then so does most of the revenue.

Seriously fuck spez and the rest of the cucks. Take it to the front page and show their advertisers what censorship brings.

In history class, back in the day, you may have heard about how Rome “fell.” Your teacher probably clarified this by saying that Rome fell into decay, and then finally was overwhelmed by invaders centuries later, despite parts of it living on.

Children always ask the obvious question, which is, “How did they not notice they were falling?” The answer as always is that some did, but most did not care or had written off failure as a natural part of civilization, much as in our own right now.

People form little cliques that share delusions so that no one feels like an outsider; misery loves company, as you may recall from the words of your elders. These cliques can take over a society, and at that point, it notices nothing outside of the story they tell about it.

Normally it goes like this: a civilization becomes prosperous because of good — perhaps too good — leadership. It beats back threats both natural and human, organizes itself to be efficient, and now can support more people.

At this point, society becomes a form of insulation or insurance against the consequences of our actions. If you forget to set aside food for winter, you can take out a loan, or get a job, and earn money to take care of yourself. You can survive without thinking.

Consequently, the group of people who could not exist without civilization explode in number. In nature, they would have found their numbers limited; with the advantages of civilization, those least likely to sustain civilization benefit the most in terms of reproduction.

These are welcomed most by those in the middle. Shopkeepers, dressmakers, entertainers, doctors, lawyers, and others who sell goods and services to the general public find themselves delighted by the thought of more customers.

In time, government gets in on the situation and starts making welfare payments to those who are poor so that they, too, can purchase lots of stuff. Others figure out that the more they hire in the big businesses, the more that money gets spread around.

If you look at such a society, you will see lots of happy faces, which should warn you because most people are unaware of anything beyond a few details, and when they are happy, it means that they are getting unrealistic reward at the expense of something else.

Imagine a business where a young social justice warrior edits the employee database so that everyone gets a doubled paycheck every two weeks. Assuming no one tells, each thinking that only he is getting the surprise bonus, there will be lots of happy faces, right until the business goes bankrupt and everyone gets fired.

When a society gains wealth and loses the caretakers of that wealth that keep it from being broadly distributed, fools have too much money, and their spending power causes those who should know better to rely on them as customers.

The society has essentially become a circular Ponzi scheme, where it pays out money in order to get more, having effectively borrowed from tomorrow in order to have more for today.

Such societies always embrace status equality, or that idea that instead of having a hierarchy, everyone is equal except for those in centralized control who dole out the free money and run the police state that keeps people from misbehaving too much.

During societies in this state of decline, the illusion of being “good people” comes about. Those who support the idea of equality find themselves gaining social popularity, therefore more customers, therefore winning at the consumer economy.

People of this nature are explicitly anti-realistic, meaning that they reject the cause-effect logic in which we look at what actions we took, how those turned out in reality, and judge those actions by the results achieved in reality.

Instead, they want us to judge by social intent, or how our actions were designed to make others feel. Actions no longer aim at results, but at symbolic goodness that brings in more customers.

Knowing to some degree that the free money raid cannot last forever, these “good people” (German: gutmenschen) engage in a fiction that their actions have no consequence beyond the immediate.

This bourgeois mentality announces itself any time you hear people say things like, “Just work hard, go to church, and pay your taxes, and everything will be alright.” They ignore the need to keep society functional or invest in the future.

All that matters is consumption, right now. In the bourgeois view, anything but your own desires in your own lifetime does not matter, mainly because this is what you tell customers. They ignore the long-term in favor of celebrating the individualistic and short term.

Eventually this bourgeois attitude leads to something like Communism. Individualism creates a rowdy and selfish populace, and those demand free welfare and entitlements, but because of the high degree of abuse, government must oversee this to avoid exploitation.

As a result, government grows more powerful until the point that the bourgeois mind rejects free markets entirely, and wants simply to have government keep order so that business can continue, as it always seems to especially under these theoretically cash-free states.

Soon things have grown bad, but only a few percent of the population can figure it out. Simpler minds understand a strong state and free stuff; they do not understand more nuanced views, and so when people talk about alternatives, they laugh and walk away.

This means that the only people who understand what is wrong — that Rome is falling — will be shouted down, beaten up, and killed by those who are incapable of understanding that any option exists.

All human populations demonstrate the bell curve, or a difference in abilities with most people clustered in the middle, but the middle is not complex enough to understand what is wrong or what might be better. The Dunning-Kruger Effect ensures that.

Instead, the society falls into a group pathology of denying that anything is going wrong in order to avoid being clobbered by their fellow citizens, and affirming that everything is going well as a means of becoming popular and selling stuff to others.

This affirmation that all is going well forces them to embrace the idea that “decay=good,” since all is in decay, so they endorse all forms of breakdown. Perversity, corruption, criminality, stupidity, time-wasting, incompetence, and genocide must all become “good.”

In the end, socializing wins out over the type of clear thought that comes from lone exceptional individuals. The herd triumphs in having finally achieved its great Utopian victory, since no one can tell them they are wrong, just before the end.

When the barbarians arrive at the gates, it is too late, and has been too late for a long time. The strong minds have all left or died out. The fearful herd, cowering in darkness, calls out for its guardians to protect it.

However, those saw the society for what it was, ignored its face value and looked into its essence, and got paid to do exactly what they promised, none of which included “saving a dying regime from itself.”

As a result, they are long gone, and the few left who understand what must be done are not sufficient in number, not to mention barely motivated to save the group of craven, selfish, parasitic, and quivering free riders that have taken over.

Thus the barbarians sweep in and easily conquer the fallen empire, which died by its own hand.

Revelation 3:9

I will make those who are of the Synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars—I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.

In the 1920s a group at the Frankfurt School developed Critical Theory to convert the West to Communism.

Basically, the Frankfurt School plan was to undermine the Christian legacy. They called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life to de-stabilize society and destroy what they saw as the 'oppressive' order.

They hoped their policies would spread like a virus--'continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means' as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their 'quiet' cultural revolution - but giving us no idea about their plans for the future - the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.

2. Continual change to create confusion

3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children

4. The undermining of schools' and teachers' authority

5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.

6. The promotion of excessive drinking

7. Emptying of churches

8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime

9. Creating dependency on the state or state benefits

10. Control and dumbing down of media

11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism' - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.

• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls

• abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces

• declare women to be an 'oppressed class' and men oppressors

Following Adolf Hitler's rise to power in 1933, the Institute left Germany for Geneva, before moving to New York City in 1935, where it became affiliated with Columbia University.

http://archive.is/qn0gW

https://archive.is/HhfQB

https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/15545-gramscis-grand-plan

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JJyRf3HrK9QS/

NSFW Documentary: Berlin - Sin City of the 1920's. https://youtu.be/b-QlCXThsgE

It’s obvious that the central tenet of the Democrat Party platform is now hatred and contempt for Normal Americans. Taking their cue from the elites in Europe and Canada who are stripping dissenters of their free speech rights and religious freedoms, the leftist elite is moving to solidify its hold on power here with the eager assistance of tech companies and the moral support of the Fredocons who yearn to return to pseudo-relevance as the ruling class’s slobberingly loyal opposition.

In California, the leftist government is practically firing on Fort Sumter. And nationally, these aspiring fascists are especially eager to disarm Normal Americans – doing so would be an object lesson in who’s the boss, as well as solving that frustrating problem of the Normals having the ability to resist.

Probably because I’ve spent time where they actually had a civil war, many people ask me – people whose names you know – whether I think this turmoil will all end in a Second Civil War. They are seriously concerned, and not without cause – the left’s hatred for Normal Americans and its dedication to totally stripping the people who are the backbone of this country of their ability to participate in their own governance is threatening to rip the country apart.

Do I think there will be a civil war? No, but there could be. This is the Age of Black Swans, and anything is possible – we could easily see the country split into red and blue. Civil war is unlikely, but never underestimate Democrat stupidity and hatred. The Schlichter family learned that lesson a century and half ago, the last time the Democrats decided to try to impose their hatred of basic human rights on the rest of the country, when an army of Democrats burned our family hometown.

Oh, they paid for it. And they would pay again. Democrats are 0-1 in insurrections, and if they went for another round, they would be 0-2. It’s a matter of terrain, numbers, and morale.

Democrats, who think history began when Obama was elected, don’t understand the dangerous game they are playing when they talk about how they want to impose their brown shirt vision upon red America. The keyboard commandos of the left seek to hand wave away the massive strategic challenge of imposing control by force upon a well-armed, decentralized citizenry occupying the vast majority of the territory, so they babble about drones and tanks as counterinsurgency trump cards.

But there are no trump cards in war. There are men, with rifles, standing on patches of dirt, killing the people trying to push them off. That’s the ugly reality of war. And multiply the usual brutality of war by ten when it’s a civil war.

There are two Civil War II scenarios, and the left is poorly positioned to prevail in either one. The first scenario is that the Democrats take power and violate the Constitution in order to use the apparatus of the federal government to suppress and oppress Normal Americans. In that scenario, red Americans are the insurgents. In the second scenario, which we can even now see the stirrings of in California’s campaign to nullify federal immigration law, it is the blue states that are the insurgents.

The Democrats lose both wars. Big time.

Let’s talk terrain and numbers. Remember the famous red v. blue voting map? There is a lot of red, and in the interior the few blue splotches are all cities like Las Vegas or Denver. That is a lot of territory for a counter-insurgent force to control, and this is critical. The red is where the food is grown, the oil pumped, and through which everything is transported. And that red space is filled with millions of American citizens with small arms, a fairly large percentage of whom have military training. Remember what two untrained idiots did in Boston with a couple of pistols? They shut a city down. Now multiply that by several million, with better weapons and training. Let’s look at the counter-insurgent forces in the Democrat oppression scenario should they attempt to misuse our law enforcement and military in an unconstitutional manner to take the rights of American citizens.

There are a lot of civilian law enforcement officers, but the vast majority of the agencies are local – sheriffs, small town police departments. They will not be reliable allies in supporting unlawful oppression of their friends and neighbors. The major cities’ police departments are run by Democrat appointees, so the commands would be loyal. But the rank-and-file? A small percentage would be ideologically loyal. More would be loyal because that’s their paycheck – they could be swayed or intimidated to support the rebels. Others would be actively sympathetic to the insurgents. This is true of federal law enforcement agencies as well.

And the military? Well, wouldn’t the military just crush any resistance? Not so fast. The military would have the combat power to win any major engagement, but insurgents don’t get into major engagements with forces that have more combat power. They instead leverage their decentralized ability to strike at the counter-insurgents’ weak points to eliminate the government’s firepower advantage. In other words, hit and run, and no stand-up fights.

For example, how do a bunch of hunters in Wisconsin defeated a company of M1A2 Abrams tanks? They ambushed the fuel and ammo trucks. Oh, and they wait until the gunner pops the hatch to take a leak and put a .30-06 round in his back from 300 meters. Then they disappear. What do the tanks do then? Go level the nearest town? Great. Now they just moved the needle in favor of the insurgents among the population. Pretty soon, they can’t be outside of their armored vehicles in public. Their forces are spending 90% of their efforts not on actual counter-insurgency operations but on force protection. Sure, they own their forward operating bases, and they own a few hundred meters around them wherever they happen to be standing at the moment, but the rest of the territory is bright red.

As my recent novel illustrates, American guerillas with small arms are a deadly threat to the forces of a dictatorship.

But the military is so big it would overwhelm any rebels, right? Well, how big do you think the military is? And, more importantly, how many actual boots on the ground can it deploy? Let’s put it in terms of brigade combat teams, which total about 4,500 troops each. There are about 60 brigades in the Army, active and reserve, here and abroad, and let’s give the Marines another 10 brigades, for about 70 brigades. Sounds impressive. But that’s deceptive.

Let’s put aside a big consideration – the existence of red states that would provide for an insurgent government structure and possibly attract the loyalty of some National Guard and even federal brigades. For example, if President Hillary Clinton put down her chardonnay long enough to sign a ban on privately owned guns, it’s not unreasonable to expect the governor of Texas to reject federal authority – after all, California just taught us that this is totally cool. But in this case, look for several brigades located there to hoist the Lone Star flag.

So, now the blue states are facing unconventional and conventional forces. Let’s ignore that problem and focus on a different challenge. Even a normal unit has about 10% non-deployable members. Now, if these troops were assigned to combat operations against other Americans, you would have significant additional losses through desertion. Many of the senior leaders would participate – the Obama generation – and there is a certain type of junior officer only too happy to curry favor by sucking up in defiance of their oath (which is to the Constitution, not to some leftist president).

You can identify them because they usually have “strategist” in their Twitter bios. But a lot of key, capable officer and NCO leaders, and enlisted troops, would vanish. That is proper. It is a violation of their oath to unconstitutionally oppress fellow Americans; their duty would be to refuse such unlawful orders.

So, you have significantly understrength units going in. Now, how many of the troops in a brigade are actually even front line combat troops? About a third – the rest are support. So a brigade is really about 1500 riflemen tops before you count losses. Cut those in half for sleep, training, and refitting at any one time (which is very generous) and your brigade is really 750 troops on your best day with everyone showing up. Realistically, it’s 300.

That holds one mid-sized town. And there are hundreds of mid-sized towns. Plus there are millions of Normal Americans who would fight back. Nothing would move without their permission – a few guys shooting up big rigs along the interstate would shut down the entire trucking industry. Bottom line: there simply are not enough military forces to clear and hold red America.

What about drones and bombers? Both are useful. But the minute a bombing strike kills some red civilians the families of counter-insurgent drone operators and pilots will be knocking at the base gates to be let inside. Now you’ll need many of those brigades to protect the civilians you now need to protect from retribution. Civil wars are harsh. That’s why you avoid them.

How about the blue insurgency scenario? That goes even worse for the Democrats. You have the federal government apparatus in the hands of red America, and the insurgents are the opposite of decentralized and armed. They are conveniently centered in gun-unfriendly blue cities. In other words, the blue civilian population is much less of a threat.

A red counter-insurgency avoids the problem of a decentralized insurgency and insecure logistical lines. In the case of California, whose secessionist antics are approaching the point where President Trump could legitimately employ his power to crush insurrections, the tactical problem is relatively simple.

For example, San Francisco is a hotbed of treason, but the populace is largely unarmed and is trapped in a confined area. You put a brigade on securing the Golden Gate and Bay Bridges, then put a brigade on the San Francisco Peninsula to cut off the I-280 and US-101 corridors. Next you go to the Crystal Springs Dam and cut off the water. Then you watch and wait as the tech hipsters run out of artisanal sushi rice and kombucha.

After about a week, they surrender. After all, you can’t eat and drink smugness. LA is just bigger in scope – more corridors to cut off, but in the end the population concentrations in large liberal urban areas that are their strength also make them extremely vulnerable to logistical pressure.

Then there’s another factor, an intangible but a crucial one. It’s commitment. The Democrat threat to peace is based on its policies designed to deprive Normal Americans of their right to speak freely, to worship freely, and to defend themselves and their rights with firearms. Make no mistake – millions of Normal Americans are willing to risk death to defend those rights. In fact, many swore to do so when they entered our military and law enforcement. But who is the leftist big talker willing to die to impose the fascist dream of censorship, religious oppression, and disarmament on Normal American citizens? Is the screeching SJW at Yale going to suit up in Kevlar? Is the Vox columnist going to grab a M4? Is the Hollywood poser going to switch her gyno-beanie for a helmet?

No. Hell, we just heard our liberal opponents explaining why a cop shouldn’t be expected to go fight a scumbag murdering kids because it’s scary. America might split apart, but it’s highly unlikely Team Kale n’ Vinyl would fight should their big talk finally push Normal America too far.

Thank you guys for a new home in the coming shitstorm!