I'm not sure if you're an admin for this site or not, but I do agree with the other commenter. I've seen the articles associated with this Twitter handle before, and at best for their articles, they've received complaints from sources where they've straight up copied their article.
At worst, they make unfounded claims, cite nothing, or publish something from years ago and claim that it's present day. I would appreciate it others would vet this Twitter account a bit more and make a decision if it will be promoted content in the future or not.
Walgreens is now doing training so that it is filled and approved by the techs without a pharmacist's approval, that was my point. This would be certain scripts, and certainly not all (the common ones, I would imagine antibiotics and the like). It's insane cost cutting.
And any pharmacist who is not old and stupid knows this. The younger pharmacists have to go through so much more rigor and competition. I know several that immediately stocked up on HCQ when they found out about how useful it was.
Really appreciate people like you for pointing stuff like this out! In this case, after searching, it's for once not too old haha: https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1687944982236160000
A few days late, but hey, it's something: https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1687944982236160000
The implication of this article is that it is regarding the recent winner from Florida, but it is not. This is a July, 2022 article about a man who won in Illinois. Every commenter in here is a moron, and so are the mods for stickying this. Can't even get the right year.
That's not a source. Where is the actual source? The tweet doesn't link to anything.