Tested by 2 people.
No, we'll have lots of new genuine users who are being driven away from other platforms, who won't be able to join.
Spread the footage every way you can. Shine light on everything that boils your blood, and show it everyone.
Calm your tits man. Everything you just called us to do is terrible. We want to do everything we can to stop that. Law & Order not blood in the streets. Be better than them. Don't stoop to their level.
Checking in from ND. Nobody here cares, and nobody here will.
I wonder if the order was Negative - Negative - Positive - Positive.... I'm assuming not, but that could make sense of it.
We've been warned to watch for staged videos, and posts trying to incite the right to violence. We will remain cool of head, cool of heart, wise in our heads, and deadly with our words.
Stay focused on the fraud boys, that's the target that matters. Not this idiot larper with a megaphone.
Can we look at historical data for 3rd party candidates in MN? See where they average? You might be right, it could also be that Biden v. Trump ratios change due to Mail In Ballots vs. In-Person Ballots. Or that they change due to which counties are reporting.
3rd party may just be evenly split across counties or in-person vs mail in. Could also be total fraud. You may be right. I don't have the expertise to know. Just some questions that could be looked at.
I just want to reiterate what others are saying about the significant digits in column E. That really going to matter when making calculations like this.
That isn't that uncommon. I'm in ND, and it got called as soon as polls close. They do that on typically non-swing states. Not really ethical, but standard practice.
I checked quite a few wayback machine saves of RCP's site, and couldn't find any point where they had called PA. Please stop spreading this unless you can also post proof.
Can you provide a source? If we just copy and paste whatever claims we see, we're no better than the fake news, and risk becoming an echo chamber of fake news ourselves. I'd love to dig into this more.
No. It can support the need to look into certain counties or states for fraud, but just benford's law is not evidence of who was committing the fraud. For example. If you apply benford's law to traditionally blue states, it shows a low level of fraud on the republican side. This could mean either Republicans are trying to add votes in in blue states fraudulently, OR that Republican votes are being fraudulently repressed. Benford's law can't say which.
Hope that was clear?
"The opportunity to secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself." -Sun Tzu
I aim to know my enemy. I only use it for redpilling.