Fellow Texas teacher here. I teach music so I occasionally get to talk about the history of some of the pieces including the abject suppression of Christianity in communist Russia. Talking about the evils of socialism and communism when discussing those pieces is one of my joys. I also enjoy gently red pilling my students when they ask me about politics after school and lunch is also pretty fun. I enjoy using rhe socratic method, especially on economic and gun topics.
What the actual fuck? Do you have any idea how dangerous that is?
If you're right handed flip the pistol over so it's easier to grab if you need it. Very dangerous and slow to have it sitting on its right side. Needs to sit on the left for fastest deployment.
Had a little time prior to church this morning so I decided to make a trip to my local range.
This is my built-from-the-bottom-up AR15 in 5.56mm. I'll do some more posts on it later, as its my Texas Edition rifle.
But sitting alone at the range reminded me of the following, as I sat in the beauty of Nature on a beautiful Sunday:
Romans 1:20-21: For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities - his eternal power and divine nature - have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that humans are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened
No, not something to do with contact lenses. I made a mental note last night that Biden to looked significantly younger in the debate then I've seen recently. I believe that is a result of a live process that digitally De-ages an individual, similar to how Snapchat filter would work. Because the computer could not process the image it was getting from the eyes you see this.
Here's one from the Boston Globe
Here's one about the 2018 midterms:
https://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-do-the-supreme-court-twist/
And some good material from Cory Booker:
Some of our work is already done:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/18/democrats-supreme-court-vacancy-2016-vacancy-merrick-garland/
Here's one about Schumer:
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/chuck-schumer-supreme-court-antonin-scalia-219392
Including McConnell saying in 2007 "all nominees should get a bite regardless of timing." (Paraphrased)
Here's my main thing. If the roles were reversed, and a Democrat president and a Democrat Senate 50 days out of an election got the opportunity to replace a conservative member of scotus, they would jump on that immediately. They're going to try to play the moral High Ground here, but they have no ground to stand on.
Vox:
https://www.vox.com/2016/2/16/11026724/obama-press-conference-supreme-court
"And there are a lot of Republican senators who are going to be under a lot of pressure from various special interests and various constituencies and many of their voters to not let any nominee go through. No matter who I nominate. But that's not how the system is supposed to work. That's not how our democracy is supposed to work."
Bet Libtards would be up in arms if he'd killed the dog.