1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Will be interesting to see how to they tax Satoshi on his gains, considering nobody knows who he is, or whether he still lives, or (if alive) whether he still controls the keys.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Millions of pissed off patriots with no voice because we've been shut out from having our own platforms, and silenced on those platforms allowed by The Party. Great.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sorry to say it doesn't. This is just the next level of censorship - the one they haven't reached yet. Could happen at any moment.

2
Inertargongas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey look, someone's talking about me! I donated to Bernie in the primaries and voted Trump in the general election.

edit: 2016 primary, before all the talk of a wealth tax made me think twice

21
Inertargongas 21 points ago +21 / -0

Even if Parler moves to new servers, guess who controls the Public DNS servers everyone relies on to be able to connect to the new server? If Parler.com doesn't resolve to an IP address, nobody can visit. Truly, three companies control all electronic communications in the modern age. We should have broken them up long ago.

0
Inertargongas 0 points ago +3 / -3

The rope being sufficient to guide them is symbolic of how easily manipulated they all were into this trap. Face it, deep state is genius, they won public perception over completely, having fired a single shot.

-14
Inertargongas -14 points ago +1 / -15

Pelosi, wherever you are, I surrender. The past couple days were brilliantly executed. You win.

25
Inertargongas 25 points ago +31 / -6

Crazy theories? We're consuming this media from a tech giant, Twitter, that just yesterday demonstrated in front of the entire world its willingness to fully censor the President of the United States. They can feed us whatever content they want, in his name. Some of you clearly haven't seen what can be done with animation now. Where is Trump? Who is the last person to see him alive and in person?

27
Inertargongas 27 points ago +27 / -0

Holy fuck, you're right, his head actually separates from his torso

19
Inertargongas 19 points ago +94 / -75 (edited)

It's a fucking deep fake. Big tech gagged him and bought time to put together the most convincing fake videos ever seen. Notice how he's not giving these extremely important messages in front of the press, or literally ANY OTHER PERSON. It's just him by himself, with no one to corroborate that this is an event that actually happened. Same as the video from yesterday.

The age of trusting what we see on video has officially come to an end. Disinformation has reached level 10, we literally cannot trust our senses when there's a machine between us and reality.

4
Inertargongas 4 points ago +4 / -0

I intend to preface all their titles with the word "Acting" from now on.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

We just need to get out the vote! Enough red counties with 650% voter turnout and we'll stand a great chance of winning.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

women get rich by selling nudes on onlyfans

Sorry but I'm gonna have to disagree on this point. The median onlyfans girl takes home $145 a month after the site's commissions. Overwhelming majority of women aren't making shit off it, they're just further ruining their lives by chasing after what they perceive to be easy money.

2
Inertargongas 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd rather see this data with respect to Obama. Clinton is a low bar, I'm from a blue state and know plenty of woke idiots, and even I have never met anyone that genuinely supported her.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

A dozen out of how many? She says how many they're investigating, but not how many they've checked so far. If they investigate 15 and 12 are fraud, this is news. If they investigated 1000 and 12 are fraud, well...

3
Inertargongas 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you give them that opportunity, they're more likely to come back on their own, also.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, we have no reason to believe the same cheating wouldn't be repeated. What we need is a whole new system. Personally I think we could use a national ID with an attached anonymized identifier that only you know. Cryptographic signing of your vote, with a fully transparent database where you can later look up your vote and verify that it actually counted. Hell, let people vote whenever they're ready, and change it if they want, up to a deadline where the winner is announced. Strong cryptographic signatures, properly implemented, are presently impossible to beat. We could end identity theft in this country at the same time, too, if we wanted to.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to burst anybody's bubble, but "applications for such ballots and envelopes on which the executed declarations appear" is not the same as "ballots and envelopes". This essentially just says "ballots, files, applications, information and lists" need to be stored for 2 years.

2
Inertargongas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please don't. Cali is a manufacturing plant for disaffected Republican voters who routinely leave and help secure other states. Doesn't matter how blue Cali itself gets, their electoral votes can only be lost once, and that ship is long gone.

Remember that it's possible to win the election with as little as 23% of the popular vote, just gotta keep repositioning red votes from places like Cali, where they don't matter at all, to areas where we actually make a difference.

3
Inertargongas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even if the explanation is true, want to bet the "reminder to click upload" only went out to blue counties?

view more: Next ›