-14
Inertargongas -14 points ago +1 / -15

Pelosi, wherever you are, I surrender. The past couple days were brilliantly executed. You win.

25
Inertargongas 25 points ago +31 / -6

Crazy theories? We're consuming this media from a tech giant, Twitter, that just yesterday demonstrated in front of the entire world its willingness to fully censor the President of the United States. They can feed us whatever content they want, in his name. Some of you clearly haven't seen what can be done with animation now. Where is Trump? Who is the last person to see him alive and in person?

27
Inertargongas 27 points ago +27 / -0

Holy fuck, you're right, his head actually separates from his torso

19
Inertargongas 19 points ago +94 / -75

It's a fucking deep fake. Big tech gagged him and bought time to put together the most convincing fake videos ever seen. Notice how he's not giving these extremely important messages in front of the press, or literally ANY OTHER PERSON. It's just him by himself, with no one to corroborate that this is an event that actually happened. Same as the video from yesterday.

The age of trusting what we see on video has officially come to an end. Disinformation has reached level 10, we literally cannot trust our senses when there's a machine between us and reality.

4
Inertargongas 4 points ago +4 / -0

I intend to preface all their titles with the word "Acting" from now on.

19
Inertargongas 19 points ago +19 / -0

Security theater on an even grander scale than the TSA.

2
Inertargongas 2 points ago +3 / -1

Their plan to pack the Supreme Court sounds like a good one. Why not pack the Congress? Add a good 20,000 representatives, one from every town in America. If we can't drain the swamp, why not dilute it. The states should call for a Constitutional Convention, timed for Jan 6. Let the patriots decide what the next chapter of American history looks like.

2
Inertargongas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing against you personally, but that's not how adding 4 works

18
Inertargongas 18 points ago +24 / -6

All it takes is one dude somewhere on the planet with an appropriately designed quantum computer, and no bitcoin is safe. And he's not going to announce himself. This may be already happening, and we'd have no way to know. It would look like just another bitcoin theft with an unknowable attack vector. I would think twice before putting my life savings in crypto.

194
Inertargongas 194 points ago +196 / -2

Actually they already spent the money they took from us. This $600 is coming out of thin air just like the rest of the stimulus. Turning the dollar into toilet paper is what solved our toilet paper crisis earlier this year.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

We just need to get out the vote! Enough red counties with 650% voter turnout and we'll stand a great chance of winning.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

women get rich by selling nudes on onlyfans

Sorry but I'm gonna have to disagree on this point. The median onlyfans girl takes home $145 a month after the site's commissions. Overwhelming majority of women aren't making shit off it, they're just further ruining their lives by chasing after what they perceive to be easy money.

2
Inertargongas 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd rather see this data with respect to Obama. Clinton is a low bar, I'm from a blue state and know plenty of woke idiots, and even I have never met anyone that genuinely supported her.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

A dozen out of how many? She says how many they're investigating, but not how many they've checked so far. If they investigate 15 and 12 are fraud, this is news. If they investigated 1000 and 12 are fraud, well...

3
Inertargongas 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you give them that opportunity, they're more likely to come back on their own, also.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, we have no reason to believe the same cheating wouldn't be repeated. What we need is a whole new system. Personally I think we could use a national ID with an attached anonymized identifier that only you know. Cryptographic signing of your vote, with a fully transparent database where you can later look up your vote and verify that it actually counted. Hell, let people vote whenever they're ready, and change it if they want, up to a deadline where the winner is announced. Strong cryptographic signatures, properly implemented, are presently impossible to beat. We could end identity theft in this country at the same time, too, if we wanted to.

1
Inertargongas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to burst anybody's bubble, but "applications for such ballots and envelopes on which the executed declarations appear" is not the same as "ballots and envelopes". This essentially just says "ballots, files, applications, information and lists" need to be stored for 2 years.

2
Inertargongas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please don't. Cali is a manufacturing plant for disaffected Republican voters who routinely leave and help secure other states. Doesn't matter how blue Cali itself gets, their electoral votes can only be lost once, and that ship is long gone.

Remember that it's possible to win the election with as little as 23% of the popular vote, just gotta keep repositioning red votes from places like Cali, where they don't matter at all, to areas where we actually make a difference.

3
Inertargongas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even if the explanation is true, want to bet the "reminder to click upload" only went out to blue counties?

7
Inertargongas 7 points ago +7 / -0

A Cali refugee is 3x more likely to be republican than a democrat. For as long as the electoral college exists, Republican exodus from Cali is a good thing. Those voters contribute to victories elsewhere, and it doesn't matter if Cali goes 100% blue - leaning even heavier blue doesn't get them any more electoral college voters. Let it become a distillate of pure leftists, until it destroys itself.

view more: ‹ Prev