Imagine you're out shoveling your driveway, and you think 'eh, I might as well do the neighbors' too, it's cold or w/e, save 'em some time, I'm already out there.'
And as a result, the thanks you get is a news article likening and comparing you to Nazi's and trying desperately to make sense of how you can do something nice.
I wasn't aware that the press swore to destroy anything
As a Canadian I legit feel frustration that I'm not American and thus I can't just go out with you guys and kick their ass.
If I was American I'd have quit my job by now specifically to fight Antifa people.
Sounds like LARP but I'd be famous for better or worse, in prison or some shit.
I need to see a therapist probably, I'm not even American and the shit makes my blood boil.
Well it'd be better if she just ratted on the next one up the chain, if she rolled over she might kill 'em
Man. It's really frustrating.
I have a liberal friend who I try to discuss this shit with, he counters my points with articles from the BBC and other similar media outlets that he boasts as the most unbiased (BBC in particular).
Whenever i want to link him to any article talking about this shit, he'll go to "allsides" which is some media bias thing that rates places for their bias, and inevitably point out how anyplace I link him any information from is rated as hard right bias.
It kinda fucking sucks man, because I want to appeal to him as a reasonable person but he just can't take anything seriously that comes from anything more right than Breitbart. In his mind it's just as laughable as a site like Vox or The New York Times.
Which i can't even necessarily argue against in good faith, ever since Reagan removed the anti-bias media laws, it's hard to trust anything at all
In Toronto atm, there's a rule where, if you're a family you can't have guests over at all, even if you live in a house split into two apartments, like family in the basement, family upstairs, you're technically not allowed to visit eachother within the same household.
Also, if you're single and don't live with anyone, you're only allowed to associate yourself with 1 family, whether it's your own, or some other family. Otherwise, nada.
This isn't true for me, they both populate no problem
Ah well, is that not the end of the road then?
Unless I'm mistaken, I was under the impression that Act 77 being invalid was the argument of the case. I'll have to re-read it
Because almost all mail-in ballots are written in as unconstitutional in Pennsylvania, with few exceptions (disability etc)
They tried to put through an amendment to the constitution to change that, but they didn't follow the proper procedure, so the amendment isn't even in place.
The meme/joke is 420 is a cliché gamertag.
You're being all retarded for nothing
Man. My one lib friend seems to think the concept of Trumps team getting anything before the SCOTUS is as much of a pipe dream as overturning the election (in their eyes)
To be fair, I'm actually Canadian so I've just been constantly trying to learn how things work in greater and greater depth since Nov 3rd.
Why is it that my friend believes it could never get to SCOTUS, and why is he wrong?
I'm sure thanks to your post here, she does now
So, wouldn't a full audit of any of these places completely expose the whole thing and end this whole matter? (In regards to proving fraud)
As in, if it's just the data that's manipulated and reported, wouldn't a full hand recount manually of the paper ballots expose it?
Alright fair enough, so we are all on the same page lol
Hmm, wondering if this sort of connection is something a judge is going to take very seriously. I do hope they're able to shed light on hard, irrefutable fuckery, a direct hit so to speak
Wait, there's proof of that? Can you link?
Wait, playing devils advocate because maybe I'm out of the loop. But the statement they say is a fact check is about 'Dominion' but then the whole article is about Smartmatic, which... I thought were two separate companies?
Is there like, rock solid evidence they're the same company I haven't seen?
Edit: oh lol, they even mention that
oh okay, so she meant to say state legislature, got it, of which that state is Republican. Now, would that be a 'faithless elector' or w/e situation, is it likely they would certify for Trump?
A couple days go when they were deadlocked, Jenna said "This evening, the county board of canvassers in Wayne County, MI refused to certify the election results. If the state board follows suit, the Republican state legislator will select the electors."
Who/what does she mean by the republican state legislator will select the electors?
How does that work?
Just popped in, is Mark Thomsen good guy or bad guy?
Edit: Fuck this guy eh lol
Hmm, isn't the Federal Election Commission some finance wing? Not trying to be a doomer or anything, but when I read the headline it sounded like the person who runs the board that runs the elections or something a bit more grand and appropriate to celebrate
Hahaha yeah man, it's the most unappealing, fucking retarded name for an election-related anything. The simulation is wild
What Trump really should do imo.
Fund and create his own cryptocurrency, maybe tied into his media network in some form or fashion.
All Trump supporters would buy in hard, little to no one on the left would show anything but disdain for it, but Trumps hype would cause everyone on the right to become rich.
Imagine being able to say to a leftist "My president made me rich, what does yours do for you?"