3
Ivleeeg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well if I remember right, mitt kind of cheated in the primary after that it was mitt or a dem. Mitt lost the first round of votes in the primary.

2
Ivleeeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Herman is fine but he's not even in the same stratosphere as Rush or Hannity. He's an OK supporting act but he just doesn't have the presence to become another Limbaugh like figure.

5
Ivleeeg 5 points ago +5 / -0

He won't be replaced. Someone different is needed for this time and they will appear. God will ensure it.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can fit 10 us states too... (think northeast, NH RI, CT, etc.

France + Germany is bigger than Texas.

Europe is larger than the US geographically.

Not sure what the point of this exercise is though. Other than just a bit of geography fun.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +2 / -1

Well I would hope so. Germany is tiny compared to the US. I'm just saying this because obviously the area that is being discussed has this recurring problem.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not only that, they don't have an opposition party really. They are allowed to do as they please without a billion law suits, political maneuvers to stop their agenda, etc.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, they may write a whole new constitution but ratification would be needed.

5
Ivleeeg 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep. This was my original concern with "the plan" we thought would happen. We were still putting our faith in politicians. Some said it was state level, which didn't help much seeing state after state accept fraudulent results with mere whimpers.

2
Ivleeeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

When they whine about "muh majority voted to convict" or "the 2/3 rule is stupid" remind them that a criminal jury must be unanimous to convict, so this is an even lower standard than your average jogger is held to and they still couldn't convict.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

As fun as this sounds, it ends up being symbolic more than anything. Who decides if it's constitutional? Why, the deep state controlled legislatures and courts, of course.

4
Ivleeeg 4 points ago +4 / -0

The purpose of this is to prove that a) you need to still wear a mask and social distance and b) that everyone must get the vaccine so we can reach Herd immunity. They're not reporting this as any sort of vindication for us, there is always an agenda.

7
Ivleeeg 7 points ago +7 / -0

This was obvious to anyone with a brain. They'd have played the video on loop on the news of a trump supporter attacking the cop with a fire extinguisher. Every inch of the events of the 6th were covered by a live stream. It simply never happened.

2
Ivleeeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for the summary.

2
Ivleeeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

What did she say that they're so butt hurt about?

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I spelled it out pretty clearly in the first post. Organize locally, offline.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

While that's great in a text book, doing it here is just about as dumb as you can get.

2
Ivleeeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Manchin will sell us out. Why wouldn't he? If he were a man of principle he'd have switched sides to prevent the dems from doing anything crazy. But he knows it's all a game and he's just playing his part. Expect a lot of symbolic votes but when the rubber meets the road, realize he's going to fall in line.

view more: Next ›