agreed, I seem to remember also reading something recently that they are simply using the format the Dems put forth with the Russia hoax where they put out Executive Summaries so they didn't have to release a document that is largely redacted. I'm hoping this is the case here and this is just the appetizer .... feast will ensue but you and I may never be privy to those details.
you might like this article .... supports your wet dream :) https://libertyunyielding.com/2020/12/04/in-trumps-campaign-to-save-the-republic-we-havent-seen-the-key-supporting-effort-yet/
For your dining pleasure this evening
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf
It appears I may have been hasty in my assesment ... upon further review.
Though Alito originally called for response arguments from the Commonwealth to be filed by 4 p.m. on Wednesday, Dec. 9th, the case docket was changed Sunday morning to move that deadline up to Tuesday, Dec. 8, by 9 a.m. The change is critical. Pennsylvania’s members of the electoral college are due to meet at noon on Dec. 14th in Harrisburg to cast their votes for president. As Law&Crime has previously reported, and as Kelly’s arguments point out, federal election law sets a so-called “safe harbor” deadline which requires controversies “concerning the appointment of all or any of the electors . . . by judicial or other methods or procedures” to be determined “at least six days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors.” Alito’s original Dec. 9th deadline failed to take that window into account. His new deadline does.
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee YEEEEEEEHAWWW
I love the smell of napalm in the morning.