But isn't there a risk that, barring repairs in the election process (say, the senate and judiciary is not in a position to block the federal gov from obstructing reform in the state houses), many Trumpians will be black pilled, and withdraw from the process alltogether? And a lot of that agenda seems to be things that can't be easily reversed: some of these threats, such as adding more states to the union, packing the court, creating amendments to the constitution (something that floridians ought to be afraid of, seeing as how we had a 15$/hour minimum wage written into ours last election)...couldn't such changes block the movement going forwards? Or do we have some kind of defence against such drastic changes I'm not aware of?
Ah, my bad. I copied and pasted the document from wordpad, and evidently the format was lost in translation.
I got a... little carried away. What started as me wanting to ask a question turned into me venting alotta... alot that I had on my chest.
The long and short of it is my concern that surrendering the senate in Georgia to punish the Rhino's for selling out Trump and to allow the Dem's to tear themselves apart will prevent the state houses from fixing the systems that allowed the fraud to occur in the first place, and allow the radical left certain powers to push policies that, even with a resulting red wave afterwards, cannot be repaired (packing the court, adding states to the union, amendments to the constitution) for a long time.
It seemed to me it would be better to pick the lesser of two evils, that have it in their best interest to acknowledge the fraud and use our (limited) power over them to press an investigation, rather than the democrats, who have it in their best interest to ignore us and excise us from the political scene, and allowing the systems and enforcing the systems that created this fraud in the first place.
I was wondering if I was missing some obvious reason I'm wrong.