JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0


It appears that you've forgotten to count in the "Unaffiliated", otherwise known as Independents. Current analysis shows that 83% of the "unaffiliated" in N.C. vote Republican. Therefore;

Mecklenburg County: 232,210 (83% of Unaffiliated Voters) + 162,182 (Republican Voters) = 394,392 Republican votes vs. 332,693 Democrat votes.

Wake County: 262,805 (83% of Unaffiliated Voters) + 179,850 (Republican Voters) = 442,655 Republican votes vs. 287,697 Democrat votes.

Now don't forget to add to this the number of DEMOCRATS who are going to cross the aisle and vote for a REPUBLICAN because gas, economy, wars and simply sick of Biden/Harris.

JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

These kids graduate not being able to count change back for a $20 on a $5.93 purchase, do their taxes, understand their paycheck stub, construct a resume, pay a bill or manage a checking/credit card account. But they will damn sure know how to be a communist social justice puke on a social media account. smdh...

JWSchrecker 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hey! Look at this. BobTaxes is using the ole Liberal Left Wing(nut) Arguing Checklist.

  1. Skim until Offended
  2. Disqualify that Opinion/Facts [States opposing case with little/no supporting evidence]
  3. Attack, Attack, Attack [Ad Hominem/Name Calling]
  4. Change the Narrative [Criticises "tone" without addressing substance, You hurt my feelings/other topic]
  5. Disregard Inconvenient Facts
  6. Use only anecdotal emotional/compromise arguments
  7. Make S#!t Up [Example: Climate Change, Denies Election Fraud, Claims We're not Post-Racial]
  8. Resort to Moral Equivalency
  9. Concern Trolling
  10. When all else fails, "ISM!"...Racism, Sexism, Sexualism

He's resorting to #3.

Let's see if any further comment of his is original critical thinking or simply something right off the ole Liberal Left Wing(nut) Arguing Checklist.

JWSchrecker 0 points ago +1 / -1

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment says a state can’t “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Unborn children are indeed "persons" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments. There is no constitutional text explicitly holding unborn children not to be, "persons," Specifically, it is argued that the Constitution does not confer upon the federal government a specifically enumerated power to grant or deny "personhood" under the Fourteenth Amendment. Rather, the power to recognize or deny unborn children as the holders of rights and duties has been historically exercised by the states. Other Supreme Court cases implicitly recognize this function of state sovereignty. The states did exercise this power and held unborn children to be persons under the property, tort, and criminal law of the several states. As an effect of the unanimity of the states in holding unborn children to be persons under criminal, tort, and property law, the text of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment compels federal protection of unborn persons.

Clearly, people do have a Constitutional right to life, and they don’t have to be 18 to enjoy it. And this applies even to an unborn baby in the womb.

Now your turn, show me where is say that abortion is a "right" in the U.S. Constitution. I see no mention of the word "abortion" anywhere in the Bill of Rights, or the U.S. Constitution. Do you?

JWSchrecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand your argument. SCOTUS is NOT forcing women to have unprotected sex and get pregnant and have babies. All the SCOTUS will be doing is preventing women from killing innocent babies when they could have very easily used birth control measures to prevent pregnancy in the first place. Is your argument that you wish to avoid responsibility for the results of your inattentive lackadaisical actions of laziness? Well, too bad. You WILL be held responsible and you will bow to and heed the proscriptions against murdering babies whether you like it or not. And if you don't like it you are free to move to a country that allows such perversions. We don't want you around us if you're like that anyway.

JWSchrecker 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was an emergency hearing. The decision is past due.

Yes, they pranked us, AND PUNKED US!

Things like this are why civil wars happen.

JWSchrecker 5 points ago +5 / -0

We've been pranked by SCOTUS. They did NOT release the decision on mandates.

The wait continues...

JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Badfinz_FL is correct.

This exercise (Robin Sage) happens every year.

There is no connection to the DOJ regarding the training exercise.

But this should teach you that true and honest Pedes do their research before jumping to conclusions and posting tripe like this just for attention.

JWSchrecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

??? You do realize that it would be the SITTING President (Donald J. Trump) and his VP who'd be the ONLY ones in a position to correct further DEMOCRAT election fraud regarding President Donald J. Trump's replacement?

Even the "1 more term" is very important.

JWSchrecker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks to me like a message was sent to this family.

And it appears to me that the parents aren't as shocked by this as one would expect. I'm betting that they know who, and why.

JWSchrecker 4 points ago +5 / -1

I'm sure that he'll drop them right away just because YOU demanded it.

Oh, BTW, just who are you again?

JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Useless? Apparently you've forgotten about how Pence had a very important decision to make and he failed President Donald J. Trump and all Americans by not doing the constitutionally correct and proper thing and decertifying the corrupt presidential election. Useless? I think not.

And that's why liberals fear DeSantis in the VP position. Had DeSantis been the VP instead of Pence our country would be in far better shape right now.

JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't help but wonder if those saying DeSantis should stay in Florida are only doing so because they fear the tremendous amount of good DeSantis would would do for the nation as well as Florida as a VP. Could it be that they are actually liberals desperate to avoid a Trump/DeSantis White House because that would doom liberals forever?

JWSchrecker 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm curious, I don't understand what you mean by "bait". Baiting who, for what reason?

Yes, I'm serious and this is a serious question.

JWSchrecker 11 points ago +11 / -0

Watch him make these comments:


I'm proud to say I voted for him!

Live your life the way you want,... just don't try to indoctrinate our children. Such decisions do not belong to them until they're adults with a firm parental education given them.

JWSchrecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why yes, very interesting indeed, since it now reads:

Do You Want Trump To Run Again In 2024?

Yes, absolutely. 43%

No, I want someone else. 39%

I don't know. 16%

Total: 12,469

AND I suspect that President Donald J. Trumps lead is going to grow even larger as the poll continues.

JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

This poor little snowflake Liberal has TDS coursing through their body and President Donald J. Trump living rent free in his brain 24/7/365! So funny to watch them try of post their failing propaganda on Patriots.win.

JWSchrecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong.” ~Abraham Lincoln

JWSchrecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some articles to consider:



Here....have a look in the mirror;

I merely hold the mirror. If you are disgusted by what you see in that mirror then I ask you what would make more sense; Slamming your fist into the mirror in a futile effort to make the image go away, or working to change the image into something pleasant to look upon?

The ONLY thing that sets us Blacks as a race apart from the other FOUR races that share this nation with them is a decidedly disproportionate penchant for crime (by a factor of 6 to 1), perversion and slothful aberrant work ethic as evidenced by the hard cold unmanipulated FACTS. Factual data is used with everything; sports, stocks, money, weather etc. Why are they not used with this issue?

Why ARE there more BLACK serial killers? Why ARE there more BLACK pedophiles? Why ARE there more BLACK violent criminals? Why ARE there more BLACKS on welfare? Why ARE there more BLACKS spreading AIDS/HIV?

Just what is wrong with the BLACK race in North Carolina and when is the BLACK community going to do something about it?

★ Blacks comprise ONLY 22% of North Carolina's population yet;

------------------------N.C. PEDOPHILIA--------- North Carolina Pedophiles by Race North Carolina Sexual Offender Registry Data: 12/31/2012; Pedophiles ONLY

_____Total on___NC Pop# of Pedophiles __Sex Off____By Per 100,000 NC Pop Race_____Registry___Race________by Race

Black____6673___2,145,456__289 per 100,000 @ 22% of NC Pop Indian____295____146,281___194 per 100,000 @ 1.5% of NC Pop White__13668___7,031,245___188 per 100,000 @ 72.1% of NC Pop Asian_____86_____224,298____38 per 100,000 @ 2.3% of NC Pop

Likelihood offender will be;

Black___289 per 100,000 = 40.76% Indian__194 per 100,000 = 27.36% White___188 per 100,000 = 26.52% Asian/PI__38 per 100,000 = 5.36%

-----------------U.S. AIDS/HIV INFECTIONS--------- "Blacks/African Americans continue to be the most disproportionately prolific spreaders of HIV, compared with other races and ethnicities.

Blacks represent approximately 12% of the U.S. population, but accounted for an estimated 44% of new HIV infections in 2010. They also accounted for 44% of people living with HIV infection in 2009.

Unless the course of the epidemic changes, at some point in their lifetime, an estimated 1 in 16 black men and 1 in 32 black women will be diagnosed with HIV infection."

CDC. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2012;17(No. 3, part A). http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics_2010_HIV_Surveillance_Report_vol_17_no_3.pdf Adobe PDF file. Published June 2012.

------------------U.S. SERIAL KILLERS--------- Serial Killers in the United States Data Date Span: 1850 - 2013 Based on FBI Criteria for Serial Killers "Rise of the Black Serial Killer" ~Justin Cottrell

Black ----914 @ between 15.70% (1850) and 13.10%(2013) of US Pop. White ---832 @ between 83.69% (1850) and 78.10% (2013) of US Pop. Hispanic --64 @ between 00.60% (1850) and 16.70% (2013) of US Pop. Asian -----10 @ between 00.01% (1850) and 05.00% (2013) of US Pop.

Chances a serial killer will be Black......41.65% Chances a serial killer will be White......6.36% Chances a serial killer will be Hispanic...2.53% Chances a serial killer will be Asian.......1.32%

In Rise of the Black Serial Killers: Documenting a Startling Trend, Justin Cottrell expels the myth that serial killers in America are predominately white. https://www.amazon.com/Rise-Black-Serial-Killer-Documenting/dp/1475012802

------------------------U.S. WELFARE--------- For the United States (Data date June 1st, 2015);

US Pop Total_______311,591,917 On Welfare___(4.1%) 12,463,677

Black:____39.80% of total on welfare__12.15% on welfare by race. White:___38.80% of total on welfare___1.99% on welfare by race. Asian:____2.40% of total on welfare___1.92% on welfare by race. Other:____3.30% of total on welfare___5.28% on welfare by race. Hispanic:_15.70% of total on welfare___3.76% on welfare by ethnicity.

Source U.S. Census Bureau 2015

When you consider that there are ONLY about 42 million Blacks in this nation and 246 million Whites (THAT'S TWO HUNDRED MILLION MORE than Blacks) in this nation yet Blacks hold the lead in receipt of taxpayer funded welfare handouts in BOTH "total number of" and "total number by race" it's VERY telling.

-----------------N.C. VIOLENT CRIMES----------- FACT: Our crime population in North Carolina is comprised of;.

FIVE Blacks out of every 1,000 Blacks in North Carolina TWO Indians out of every 1,000 Indians in North Carolina ONE White out of every 1,000 Whites in North Carolina TWO/TENTHS of an Asian out of every 1,000 Asians in North Carolina

A North Carolina criminal is 60.98% more likely to be Black A North Carolina criminal is 24.39% more likely to be Indian A North Carolina criminal is 12.20% more likely to be White A North Carolina criminal is 2.44% more likely to be Asian

NC Dept. of Corrections 01/31/2013. NC POP Total___9,752,073. Prison Race_Prison Ct_NC Pop %NC Pop Ct# Per 1,000. WHITE___9,088_____72.1_____7,031,245_____1.29 BLACK__11,769_____22_______2,145,456_____5.49 INDIAN___410______1.5_______146,281______2.80 ASIAN/OR__46______2.3_______224,298______0.21

-----------------CUMBERLAND COUNTY CRIMES 2013----------- N.C. Department of Corrections CUMBERLAND COUNTY 01/01/2013 - 12/31/2013 Data Date: 03/24/2014 County Pop: 324,049 Entered Prison for:

County Pop %__54%_37%__2%_3%___2%__2% Crime Category__B___W___I___A/O_OTH_UNK KIDNAP_______100%_0%__0%__0%__0%__0% 1ST DEG MDR___93%_7%__0%__0%__0%__0% OTH TRAF VIO__92%__8%__0%__0%__0%__0% DRUGS________79%_11%__3%__0%__8%__0% ASSAULT______76%__16%__6%_0%__2%__0% FORGERY______75%_25%__0%__0%__0%__0% OTH PUB OF___74%__23%__2%_0%__2%__0% ROBBERY______73%_21%__3%__0%__4%__0% BURGLARY_____67%_29%__0%__0%__5%__0% OTH PROP_____67%_33%__0%__0%__0%__0% 2ND DEG MDR__65%_29%__0%__0%__6%_0% B&E__________65%_25%__2%__1%__7%__0% MANSLTR_____63%__38%__0%_0%__0%__0% AUTO THEFT___60%_20%__0%__0%__0%__0% DWI_________59%__30%__3%__0%__8%__0% FRAUD_______59%__41%__0%__0%__0%__0% HAB FELON____58%_29%__13%_0%__0%__0% OTH SEX OFF___50%_44%__0%__0%__6%__0% DRUGS TRAF___50%_40%__0%__0%__10%_0% LARCENY______49%_38%__9%__1%__1%__1% SEX ASSAU____43%__48%__5%__0%__5%__0% OTH OFF PER___33%_50%__17%__0%_0%_0% BURNINGS_____17%_50%__33%__0%__0%_0% Grand Total ____65%_26%__4%__0%__4%__0%

N.C. Dept of Corrections Data Date: 03/25/2014 CUMBERLAND_1st/2nd_Deg_Murder/Manslaughter

Year___W%__B%__I%__A%__O/U% 2013__23%__74%__0%__0%__3% 2012__27%__63%__3%__0%__7% 2011___9%__88%__3%__0%__0% 2010__18%__74%__5%__0%__3% 2009__17%__77%__3%__0%__3% 2008__12%__82%__0%__0%__6% 2007__33%__63%__0%__0%__4% 2006__23%__77%__0%__0%__0% 2005__37%__59%__2%__0%__2% 2004__42%__56%__3%__0%__0% 2003__21%__67%__7%__2%__2% 2002__32%__57%__8%__0%__4% 2001__34%__52%__6%__0%__8% 2000__24%__62%__5%__3%__5% TTL___26%__66%__4%__0%__3%

------------------------N.C. WELFARE---------- July 2012 (Verified with N.C.D.S.S. on July 11, 2012) Total N.C. Pop. 9,656,401

__N.C. Pop.___N.C. Pop.____N.C. Count_____N.C. % __Racial %____Count_____On Assistance___On Asst BLK:_22.00%__2,124,408____687,989_______32.38% WHT:_72.10%_6,962,265____897,159_______12.89% OTH:_5.90%___569,727_____47,934_________8.41%

FACT: One (1) out of every three (3), 32 out of every hundred, (687,989 total) blacks in N.C. is on welfare. FACT: One (1) out of every ten (10), 12 out of every hundred, (897,159 total) whites in N.C. is on welfare. FACT: One (1) out of every twelve (12), 8 out of every hundred, (47,934 total) other in N.C. (I, A, PI etc) is on welfare.

JWSchrecker 0 points ago +1 / -1

I discovered that I'm 0.2% Angolan/Congolese

I'm now a proud Black man. Just because I’m a light skinned Black male doesn’t give people (mostly dark skinned Blacks and LIBERAL White Apologists) the right to be racist and oppress me by denying my blackness over nothing more than the color of my skin. Why do you act racist like that?

You don't get to make the decision regarding my race. It was your Democrat legislators who legislated the hypo-descendency rule into the laws that make me a BLACK MAN.

I do have to note the sheer surprise I’ve experienced at the suddenly found freedoms and perks that I’ve experienced now that people have proof that I’m Black. I never realized how freeing that having Black privilege is. And being at the head of all lists and selection processes is certainly a plus. Initially they push back until I show them my DNA results and the hypo-descendency rule, but after seeing those they shrug their shoulders and comment that all they needed was the capability to put a check mark in the “Black” box and we all move on; them happy to have an intelligent Black man on their team and me happy to be making the money I deserve because I was ENTITLED to it as a Black man. I'm so delighted that I encourage OTHERS to have their DNA tested so that they TOO can enjoy the BLACK PRIVILEGE.

Furthermore, it is scientifically recognized that the average human body has approximately 120,000 drops of blood in it. Mathematically 1 drop of blood equates to 0.0008333 percent. This means that under the one drop rule only 0.0008333 percent of genetic material present by blood DNA content is required to be racially classified as "Black". I have 120 times more than the minimum required to be considered "Black". Now where's my reparation check?

I find it interesting that dark skinned Blacks and liberal White apologists are so very racist towards us light skinned Blacks.

And do you really think that the readers are going to take YOUR opinion over that of a bona-fide college professor?

"To be considered black in the United States not even half of one's ancestry must be African black. But will one-fourth do, or one-eighth, or less? The nation's answer to the question 'Who is black?" has long been that a black is any person with any known African black ancestry. This definition reflects the long experience with slavery and later with Jim Crow segregation. In the South it became known as the "one-drop rule,'' meaning that a single drop of "black blood" makes a person a black. It is also known as the "one black ancestor rule," some courts have called it the "traceable amount rule," and anthropologists call it the "hypo-descent rule," meaning that racially mixed persons are assigned the status of the subordinate group. This definition emerged from the American South to become the nation's definition, generally accepted by whites and blacks. The one-drop rule has long been taken for granted throughout the United States by whites and blacks alike, and the federal courts have taken "judicial notice" of it as being a matter of common knowledge. This American cultural definition of blacks is taken for granted as readily by judges, affirmative action officers, and black protesters as it is by Ku Klux Klansmen". ~ F. James Davis: Professor of Sociology, Illinois State University

view more: Next ›