5
JWSchrecker 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm wondering about that 2% of men in this who will date trans-women that think they're "straight"?

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for this. I really enjoyed listening to it. To some, this is a fine distinction, but was Alan Watts really a liberal? He strikes me more like a libertarian than a liberal. And this warning to all that "virtue" can be dangerous seems more like a conservative viewpoint rather than a liberal one. Just some thoughts.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you listen to about 7:30 of this you quickly realize that this woman's goal is to ease you into accepting the cancel-culture and be accepting of liberal workplace policies. OP apparently didn't listen to more than a few seconds (OR) OP is an infilTRAITOR attempting to subjugate the rest of us.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clear your browser cache, especially cookies. That's the problem for issues like the one you describe 99.99999% of the time.

4
JWSchrecker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Having been given 30-day posting bans several times I can tell you that they HATE it when you don't open the banned account for that 30 days. They can't stand that you won't be subjected to their advertisements for such a long period of time. And they will try every trick in the book to get you to log in quickly again either through emails or texts that make it appear that you need to see a certain post or other. Can't imagine why they expect us to morosely look at posts that we can't respond to. I suspect that this is all automated anyway. Just ignore it.

0
JWSchrecker 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're missing "the" point. He wasn't asking for anything stupid. He was asking for help. But you do you, and I'll do me. Bye Felicia.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's time to do away with the fear. President Donald J. Trump showed us that. Don't forget that there was FAR MORE Trump signage than there was for Biden. The ones who feared then were the DemLibLeftists. So much so that they had to CHEAT to "win". There are no operational security issues with standing your ground and speaking your mind through conservative signage. And anyone advising you to hide now is exposing themselves as being a minion of the opposition. They want to silence you and keep you in fear. Do not heed them. Speak out and do so loudly. It's time to take the fight to them!

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Many of Biden's EOs are direct violations of the 10th Amendment.

“A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” ~ decision in Marbury v. Madison

4
JWSchrecker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly why trying to primary them won't work. Why try to fight the battle on their battleground? Why give the Republicans power over you? Go the route of a third party where YOU set the rules and challenge them in the GENERAL elections. Don't think for a second that a third party based on President Trump's ideology wouldn't immediately rocket into strength enough to readily challenge Republicans and Democrats both. You know, the same way President Trump challenged and BEAT 13+ mostly elite Republican challengers.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thou doth protest too much, methinks...

A third-party driven by President Donald J. Trump's ideology with President Donald J. Trump's support can CERTAINLY win a general election and quite easily because it would immediately draw voters, money and support AWAY from the Republican party, and even some from the Democrat party, just as President Donald J. Trump drew voters away from the ELITE Republicans.

Seems to me that is what many elite Republicans are desperately afraid of.

Also seems to me like YOU may be one of those elite Republicans desperate to minimize and snub this great idea of a third-party to replace the Republicans.

No, we GUT the GOP by taking all their America and Americans First legislators, their contacts, money, and voters. We leave them and their charter, ideology, and platform behind and enact OUR own platform to be followed or OUR candidate loses our support IMMEDIATELY according to our own rules. We make it so that we DON'T have to worry about infiltrators from other parties. We learn from the Republican's (and Blue Dog Kennedy Democrat's) mistakes. And do you REALLY think a MAGA candidate can't win, even against an Incumbent Democrat?

IMHO I believe that President Trump has firmly changed that dynamic and his running on a "Patriot" party platform would have the effect of drawing 74+ MILLION to such a party making it exceedingly competitive. Primaries only choose the person to represent a particular party. It only affects a given party. It is the GENERAL election that counts. And ballot access for party candidates is not that onerous as evidenced by my state of NC last ballot which reflected the following choices for president.

TRUMP, DONALD J - REPUBLICAN PARTY

BIDEN, JOSEPH R - DEMOCRAT PARTY

BLANKENSHIP, DON - CONSTITUTION PARTY

HAWKINS, HOWIE - GREEN PARTY

JORGENSEN, JO - LIBERTARIAN PARTY

President Trump didn't get votes because he was a "Republican". President Trump got votes because he was Donald J. Trump. And now that he's shown all of us the way I think that a Patriot party would quickly become highly competitive AND serve to replace the Republican party as one of the top contending parties in as little as a year. President Trump has clearly proved that an American First, Anit-socialist/communist, oil/gas/energy independent, reduced regulation/red tape platform WORKS to improve the American economy for Americans. Such a Patriot party platform would also serve to ensure that there'd be no Mitch McConnellesque, John McCainesque backstabbing majority/minority/legislative leaders as they'd be confined to the planks of the Patriot party or immediately lose party support (contacts, media access, MONEY) under party rules and policies if they're correctly established. Rinos would be hard-pressed to infiltrate now as they've been completely exposed at this point. And measures could be taken within a Patriot party charter/rules/regulations to make sure that such infiltrations don't occur like they obviously have in the Republican party. I just think that the idea of a Patriot party's time has come.

Keep in mind that every single Trump voter (and yes, some Democrat voters) who switch from the Republican party to a Patriot party takes money out of Republican coffers and puts it into the Patriot party coffers. That is an irrefutable FACT!

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, they're still as scared as Congress. They are deeply afraid of what's to come before them and being caught between "We the People" and their Masters. It doesn't look good for them either.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

IMHO I believe that President Trump has firmly changed that dynamic and his running on a "Patriot" party platform would have the effect of drawing 74+ MILLION to such a party making it exceedingly competitive. Primaries only choose the person to represent a particular party. It only affects a given party. It is the GENERAL election that counts. And ballot access for party candidates is not that onerous as evidenced by my state of NC last ballot which reflected the following choices for president.

TRUMP, DONALD J - REPUBLICAN PARTY

BIDEN, JOSEPH R - DEMOCRAT PARTY

BLANKENSHIP, DON - CONSTITUTION PARTY

HAWKINS, HOWIE - GREEN PARTY

JORGENSEN, JO - LIBERTARIAN PARTY

President Trump didn't get votes because he was a "Republican". President Trump got votes because he was Donald J. Trump. And now that he's shown all of us the way I think that a Patriot party would quickly become highly competitive AND serve to replace the Republican party as one of the top contending parties in as little as a year. President Trump has clearly proved that an American First, Anit-socialist/communist, oil/gas/energy independent, reduced regulation/red tape platform WORKS to improve the American economy for Americans. Such a Patriot party platform would also serve to ensure that there'd be no Mitch McConnellesque, John McCainesque backstabbing majority/minority/legislative leaders as they'd be confined to the planks of the Patriot party or immediately lose party support (contacts, media access, MONEY) under party rules and policies if they're correctly established. Rinos would be hard-pressed to infiltrate now as they've been completely exposed at this point. And measures could be taken within a Patriot party charter/rules/regulations to make sure that such infiltrations don't occur like they obviously have in the Republican party. I just think that the idea of a Patriot party's time has come.

Keep in mind that every single Trump voter (and yes, some Democrat voters) who switch from the Republican party to a Patriot party takes money out of Republican coffers and puts it into the Patriot party coffers. That is an irrefutable FACT!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

In case anyone hasn't figured it out yet, Mrs_Fonebone is SCARED of the post I made. That's why (s)he's so desperate to minimize it and get you to dismiss it.

Why do I write (s)he? Because (s)he writes like a man. A lot of masculine properties in HIS writing. Yeah, I took a lot of writing analysis in my law enforcement career.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

You seem to have the mistaken belief that Americans will stand for election cheating. I suggest you strap in there buttercup snowflake RINO. You're about to figuratively go for one hell of a ride. The election fraud will NOT stand.

0
JWSchrecker 0 points ago +1 / -1

And what exactly was the grade-school level insult that caused you to become so "offended"?

As an aside; It's now very common to hear liberals say "I feel threatened", "I'm offended by that.", "I'm insulted!" As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more...than a whine. "I feel threatened", "I'm insulted by that.","I find that offensive." It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase."I feel threatened", "I am offended by that." Well, so what? We don't care if you're offended, feel threatened, or insulted. Just because you 'feel' threatened, offended or insulted doesn't mean you're right. It just means that you have character afflictions called Hypersensitive Personality Disorder (Avoidant Personality Disorder) and Narcissistic Liberal Disorder. Seek treatment.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

html, body { margin: auto; max-width: 1050px; font-family: Arial,helvetica neue,Helvetica,sans-serif; background-color: #fff;

}

.new-member { color: #fb0303; font-size: 12px; }

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, we GUT the GOP by taking all their America and Americans First legislators, their contacts, money, and voters. We leave them and their charter, ideology, and platform behind and enact OUR own platform to be followed or OUR candidate loses our support IMMEDIATELY according to our own rules. We make it so that we DON'T have to worry about infiltrators from other parties. We learn from the Republican's (and Blue Dog Kennedy Democrat's) mistakes. And do you REALLY think a MAGA candidate can't win, even against an Incumbent Democrat? One did against Clinton,...AND against Biden.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not if MAGA CONTROLS the HOR and the SENATE. Or did you forget that could happen? You know, like those who thought Trump wouldn't become a President.

0
JWSchrecker 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why the space that the Republicans had once sat will be renamed the MAGA section (or whatever party name used). I think that you've forgotten that for every MAGA candidate elected a Republican/Democrat candidate LOSES their seat. No need for additional seating. Do you even think?

3
JWSchrecker 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see we have our first ^^^"doomer"^^^. Get thee behind me Satan, We got work to do and you're not invited RINO/Never-Trumper. The Republican party is the NEXT party doomed to fall by wayside. You know, like Libertarians did.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't exist to impress you. As far as challenging me, you come further than most but you're not there yet (if any of what you wrote is true) swabbie. Keep trying.

view more: Next ›