1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been there. It hurts and hurts bad. I do have a couple of things to pass on to you though that may help a little.

  1. God needed your fur baby to come home to be with a child that recently passed that needed your fur baby to help them in Heaven.

  2. The grief will pass. Not soon, but it will pass to the point where eventually you stop feeling the loss and start remembering the happy times you had with your fur baby. And your memories will bring a smile to your face rather than tears to your eyes.

That's all I got. I hope it helps.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope, I'm talking (and thinking) like an adult. A lefty is one who thinks and talks childishly about things they didn't take time to learn about and understand.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

The argument is NOT whether COGCOM exists, the argument is whether COGCOM has been activated or changed. Please do try to keep up.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope, OP served with distinction in the United States Army Military Police Corp and was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for serving in combat for my country. I served with distinction with the Fayetteville Police Department placing my life in danger for my community and retired in good standing with full retirement. My credibility is unsullied and my word is considered impeccable and unimpeachable in every military and civilian court in not only this nation but several other nations I've testified in as well. 

Your problem is that my credentials are impeccable and all the above together gives undeniable credibility and incredible gravity to the words that I write that neither you nor others can credibly attack or criticize. 

So now tell us, what sacrifices and accomplishments have YOU made that places YOU in a position to challenge me? Anything? Anything at all?

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ahhh, but it is not YOU who determines the relevance for the masses. It is they, the readers, themselves who decide for themselves what is relevant to them or not.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +2 / -1

You sir are not one of those about who I write. You are correctly identifying that which is unusual. It is those who see a military flight program for the first time and believe that the world is coming to an end because they see all the planes and helicopters in the air for the first time believing it to be a military response that it is not.

0
JWSchrecker 0 points ago +1 / -1

Never had "quotas" placed upon me. They're illegal in my state of NC and every other state I'm aware of. Your argument fails. Bye Felicia.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does an outdated 2007 document have to do with 2021 issues? It appears that your only point is to spew ad hominins. Got no time for your silliness.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's abnormal for sure. I was referring more to all the drama over military aircraft, military convoys, and other "business as usual" government actions. A U2 went up the other day for what was clearly a training flight (several close loops) and I had to laugh at all the nonsense ginned up over it on some threads. Just a caution to research finds a little more deeply before raging about something.

-6
JWSchrecker -6 points ago +2 / -8

Yeah, that's how debates and free speech works. You write something, I write something, and the others get to decide for themselves what they believe. Kind of cool how that works, huh.

-8
JWSchrecker -8 points ago +1 / -9

Hey, you're free to believe what you want,...I can't force you to be right.

-5
JWSchrecker -5 points ago +1 / -6

Hey, you're free to believe what you want,...I can't force you to be right.

-6
JWSchrecker -6 points ago +1 / -7

Hey, you're free to believe what you want,...I can't force you to be right.

-9
deleted -9 points ago +6 / -15
-1
JWSchrecker -1 points ago +1 / -2

How can images or videos that were posted to be viewed by all in the first place be "leaked". Looks like a big nothing burger to me. Not what I'd call a big deal.

0
JWSchrecker 0 points ago +1 / -1

Strange, I access Gab just fine. No lagging at all. Maybe you have a weak ISP provider or a slow internet connection locally. I'm on Spectrum using ExpressVPN in NC.

https://www.speedtest.net/result/d/9b5c9bac-31f8-482e-b806-e8cc3145756a

3
JWSchrecker 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm also happy with Dissenter. Have used it for a year with no problems.

0
JWSchrecker 0 points ago +1 / -1

Funny, I'm STILL getting Parler on the internet 0122 hrs - 01/11/2021. Looks like FAKE NEWS to me.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide

Note the word "and" after the word "President". This means that the Vice President AND blah, blah, blah "or" blah, blah, blah, BOTH have to agree and act. VP Pence has already made clear that he will not invoke the 25th Amendment. Without the VP's participation, any invocation of the 25th Amendment fails,...period.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or it really was a decoy plane and really wasn't Trump, flown back to DC just to throw you off the trail of Trump's REAL plane.

2
JWSchrecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Q: If the IA has been/will be invoked, does that remove the invocation of the 25th Amendment as an option from Pence and the Cabinet?

A: The real answer depends on who controls the most power within the military initially and with the voters ultimately. That's right, it boils down to WHO has the most power. President Donald J. Trump or the Democrats.

And the Democrats are DESPERATE to take any powers that President Donald J. Trump has at his command away from him by impeachment, 25th Amendment, hook or crook. THEY ARE SCARED OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP.

The Pentagon has already clearly stated that they WILL NOT support a 25th Amendment coup. This places the military FIRMLY under President Donald J. Trump's control...for now, and most likely permanently.

If you study the military's oaths of office for the enlisted and the officers you'll find that the enlisted are SWORN to follow the Commander in Chief's orders while the officers DO NOT swear the same and can ignore the Commander in Chief... to a point.

ENLISTED: I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

OFFICER: I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God

A major or a captain and their lieutenants standing in front of a company typically consisting of 80-250 ARMED oath keeping soldiers are generally loathe to disobey any legitimate orders of a Commander in Chief. There have been a number of officers though who have crossed the line and died from "accidental" friendly fire. The relationship between officers and their men is a TWO-way affair that is rarely influenced by politics, despite politicians', other than the Commander in Chief's, beliefs that they have any measure of control. Our military DOES NOT answer to a board of directors. There is ONLY ONE civilian in control of the military, and that's President Donald J. Trump right now,...TODAY! Still your President.

"We the People" have already demonstrated our resolve and determination with a showing of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS in Washington, DC. And despite what MSM reports I can assure you that the Senate and House legislators are SCARED. They have been shown that they can expect no reasonable measure of isolation or protection from their constituents whether they are in an airport, a restaurant, or legislative chamber. They WILL answer to ALL the people. Not just a select few.

Do not think for one minute that our soldiers will throw in with CHEATERS and serve an impostor president regardless of what Democrats order. Such occurrences are simply not commensurate to military ideology and doctrine imbued into our soldiers during their training and throughout their careers.

And finally, the VOTERS are the ultimate driving force as they are the ones who influence their sons and daughters who serve in the military and are also the ones who will not tolerate a president in office who got there by cheating. It just simply can not, and will not, stand.

The most basic standard, "Probable Cause" (a fair probability that a crime has been, or will be committed), has been clearly met and the elements of several election fraud crimes have been clearly inarguably delineated without error in several states. And as such, it's time for several warrants/orders for arrest/indictments to be sought, judicially approved, and served. In fact, far past time.

Can you honestly believe that our country, a country built as a Constitutional Republic, and on the rule of law, will lay back and allow this miscarriage of justice to continue?

If you really think that this will be allowed to stand by "We the People", especially after the release of all the PROOF of cheating then you simply have not been paying attention. There will be increasing turmoil and strife because, to borrow a slogan, No Trump, NO PEACE!

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.....<snort> sure you are. But on the off chance that you "may" have served, like I said, piss off deck swabbie. I'm sure that there's a head somewhere needing swabbing. You don't impress me. I've hooked and booked quite a few jarheads as an MP and they weren't any tougher than your average Air Force mess cook. Move on,...the adults are talking.

1
JWSchrecker 1 point ago +2 / -1

As a retired law enforcement officer, I can assure you that NOTHING you write on your car means diddly squat to any law enforcement officer. The only thing we "see" is traffic violations, expired license plates or warrant/amber alert wanted vehicles. Other than that you're pretty much insignificant to us. Just another blur among MANY! We're basically lazy and don't like doing all that much paperwork an unnecessary traffic stop generates. Just the truth.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›