4
JackLemon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Perhaps an underrated part of this meme is the panel showing the battle is against a globalist and their useful idiot a commie. Those are the actual enemies we face.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. Buy a clue. The proven beyond-all-doubt traitorous Republican wing of the uni-party betrayed Trump and us. The evidence for that is overwhelming. They deliberately sabotaged Trump so many times during his Presidency and afterwards especially in their certification of an obviously stolen election.

BTW, the term RINO is redundant. One only needs to use Republican to describe a psuedo-conservative, globalist puppet. Now get lost ChiCom Mick stooge.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

The media including Republicans are already protecting Milley and justifying his actions. Miley will quit and then be paid off with a book deal or else sell some homemade crappy art for millions.

https://patriots.win/p/13zMismsKd/they-are-trying-to-give-gen-mill/c/

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nothing will happen. What the Hildebeast did with Uranium one should have put her a way, it didn't nor did the Clinton Foundation scandals nor her destruction of evidence under subpoena. Their is a corrupt, multi-tier justice system that protects the elite and punishes outsiders like Trump and us.

Don't look for the traitorous Republicans to help. They are every bit the enemy their DemonRat colleagues are.

4
JackLemon 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was awesome. He is likely a rugby player or Aussie rules.

2
JackLemon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Paul and Cruz? Not a chance. Cruz called the people at the January 6th protest traitors and his stance against globalism is insincere. He is a globalist. Paul is a traitorous little twerp who certified the greatest election fraud ever seen in the history of the western world and is now talking about amnesty. Kennedy is suspect. He wasn't outspoken about of the steal and just said if Milley did what he said he should be fired. What a pathetic stance to take about someone who should be arrested and tried for treason.

There are no senators on our side except maybe, perhaps Hawley.

7
JackLemon 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Our Republican officials"? The Republican party is anti-American and filled with traitors that should hang for treason. MTG is a conservative who given her actions and defiance of the ChiCom Micks likely hates Republicans as much as I do.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

👆 THIS E X A C T L Y

We are responsible for our own demise. There is zero doubt that.

2
JackLemon 2 points ago +2 / -0

He even admits that CNN is working to aid the Democratic Party. Where's the FEC? Nevermind...they are completely corrupt as well.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. Who the eff is Ken? And your argument is as pathetic as the traitorous twerp Rand Paul.

4
JackLemon 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you are Mitchell, take a hike grifter. Many people here are on to you.

0
JackLemon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Probably Gab, though I not sure given I would never follow a QTarded grifter like him.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

First in a very long line that should include FouXi, Soros, the entirety of the Dimocrats party, the entirety of the Republican sans just a handful of Patriots, most of corporate America executives, etc.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed they are worse. History has proven over and over again that traitors are always treated worse than enemies. Traitors deserve to be flayed, burned, boiled alive and drawn and quartered by horses (or trucks). Enemies don't deserve that.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Turn coat? Goading people to go to a political rally in the DemonRat swamp that is guaranteed to have Antifa and FBI agiprops present is exactly something I would expect a glowie to say.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I never said it was a theory. Just that it IS science.

Robust theories are the epitome of science. It is what we scientists strive for because theories are deductive logic and data backed explanations of nature. If something can't produce theories with testable and falsifiable hypotheses, then it simply isn't a science.

Science is the collection of knowledge that comes from practising a method.

Not just any method, but one that specifically incorporates methodological naturalism and deductive logic. And science isn't just a collection of knowledge. It is a collection of JUSTIFIABLE knowledge that can be tested. History is a collection of knowledge, but it is not a science.

String Theory has all that. The fact it is only hypothesis just means it has less weight.

Absolute nonsense. It doesn't have anything but conjecture. And it is not a hypothesis either. Please point me to the actual experimental results based on data that supports String conjecture? I will make it even easier, point me to a an experimental design that would provide falsifiable and testable hypothesis based on String conjecture.

The fact it is only hypothesis just means it has less weight.

Less weight? That doesn't even make sense. Theories and hypotheses are not hierarchical. Hypotheses are testable and falsifiable proposals based on data and observation and are best derived within the context of a theory. Theories are a completely different things as I explained previously.

Mathematicians often work for years and never prove a conjecture. Does that make what they do not mathematics?

Not sure the point of bringing up mathematics because mathematics is not a science. However, fittingly, the mathematical framework of String conjecture was developed by a mathematician.

You are right that it's all conjecture but then that's the pure part of science.

Yes it is a conjecture, not a theory and conjectures are useful in science only if they can aid the formulation of testable and falsifiable hypotheses derived from a scientific theory.

You don't have to have any data to form a valid scientific argument

Absolutely wrong. Without the backing of data you don't have a scientific argument you only have an argument. In science data is King.

Given the your misuse of terms and fundamentals I conclude you're not a scientist nor knowledgeable about the philosophy of science.

Again my whole point is that these areas of study don't have the backing to be applied to the real world but are.

I hope by "backing" you mean data and experimental results. Climate studies are pseudo-science for the reasons noted in my previous posts. Their predictions are based on models that produce huge confidence limits that render them meaningless and most definitely not something to base world economic polices on.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

... that stands no chance in court

Ken, how quickly you forget. The courts are comprised and corrupt.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

What we are seeing now is the main reason the Republicans betrayed us and our President. The or masters wanted Trump gone so this replacement invasion could occur.

view more: Next ›