8
Jackietreehorn 8 points ago +8 / -0

I remember them framing Obama as heroic for breaking these same rules to go after our GEOTUS.

3
Jackietreehorn 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's not in the article anywhere. She's a captain, but it seems not this captain.

4
Jackietreehorn 4 points ago +4 / -0

They can try to make excuses but her explanation doesn't make sense. Poor judgment.

2
Jackietreehorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lot of mind reading going on again. Try to be better than the lefties. Never did I say I necessarily agree with her claims, supported her or donated anything to her or that Retard Lin wood. Again, this is a completely normal defemation defense. The entire goal of the story is this. Infighting. Go read more axios.

0
Jackietreehorn 0 points ago +2 / -2

Regardless of what you think about the case, what i said is still true. You can try and spin this around all you like and read my mind. I'm sorry you're not smart enough to understand. This is a defamation case, and a perfectly reasonable defense. Everything else you mentioned is irrelevant.

0
Jackietreehorn 0 points ago +3 / -3

Stop posting this bullshit. Her legal filing is straightforward and says all statements are part of arguing the case and nobody smart takes that as fact until its ruled on in court. It's a very basic defense. So axios and other lefty rags clipped one sentence out of context, and you retards (or plants) fall hook line and sinker for the 100000th time. Honestly it's fucking embarrassing.

11
Jackietreehorn 11 points ago +11 / -0

Read it again. Getting tired of seeing this stupid story. What I guess you missed was that "All the allegedly defamatory statements attributed to [Powell] were made as part of the normal process of litigating issues of momentous significance and immense public interest,” the court filing reads." her argument is that everything is part of the case. Do you think that is the same thing as saying she made it all up?

2
Jackietreehorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

They said and I shit you not that footwear and apparel sales spiked after the checks. Guess some folks had to run and get their new yeezys or Jordan's. You know, essentials they couldn't afford before.

2
Jackietreehorn 2 points ago +3 / -1

You are the one with the fake news. The changes she wants gut the bill almost entirely. Her only explanation is think of the lawsuits. The left suing over bils they don't like is constant. Ever wonder why it's a one way street? Because "conservatives" buy these kinds of explanations. It's pretty clear that she can't be trusted, this being the second (at least) time she's said OK people I know this is what you want but I (my donors) disagree.

2
Jackietreehorn 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's mostly spin. She bowed to her corporate donors and she is scared because everyone noticed.

25
Jackietreehorn 25 points ago +25 / -0

Just so you know this is a screenshot from a porno, not a real Dr. Well memed.

2
Jackietreehorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

They lowered the income threshold. Used to be up to 100k individual was cutoff now it's like 75k.

5
Jackietreehorn 5 points ago +6 / -1

Many of these people shit in holes and wipe with one hand and somehow they didn't all die of the Shanghai shivers.

1
Jackietreehorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sadly it's been going on for a while and I am sure it has cost lives.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›