2
Jake4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stop being delusional dude, everything you just said is bs. BBC isn't 'state run', the UK government isn't 'thouroughly lefty', and the 'the population of the UK hates Winston Churchill' is bs, only the fucking 'woke' & the other delusionals like you hate him.

OP made a false claim saying that 'The UK meddled in the election', if you read the article it just states 'a British citizen' not anything related to the UK government.

1
Jake4 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess so, down in the UK but parler.com is still up

2
Jake4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yo dude don't, there's still more that can be done to let trump win

1
Jake4 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would also like to add that the trend data for the period shown in the screenshot (1st of Nov to the 8th and 9th of Nov) doesn't show the same data. https://i.maga.host/qud3bDN.png

Here's the CSV Document: (would upload to maga.host but it doesn't allow CSV files) https://anonymousfiles.io/qYMm4ufC/

1
Jake4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has someone mass-mailed everyone who provided their emails with our own poll on who they voted for?

11
Jake4 11 points ago +11 / -0

Libtards acting as if a 'glitch' is nothing. If a 'glitch' turned some Trump votes to Biden then there must be a cause of the 'glitch'. All ballot machines of the specific make and model should be running the same firmware version, thus will be affected by the same input that caused the claimed 'glitch'.

0
Jake4 0 points ago +1 / -1

They probably don't have enough proof yet to guarantee a victory. Give it a few days when they can gather a list of thousands of entries (with claims after 1900 - like the 1902 one) just so liberals can't claim it's a default/error date stamp error of 1900.

1
Jake4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shows this for me: (UK google) Trump: 53.7% - 3,052,270 Biden: 45.2% - 2,569,350