"up to". Not even a punishment in store for those who would seek to destroy a civilizations history
I think a fair argument is that Trump himself is having problems doing things. Remember trump promised people in handcuffs. So if q is a larp, then wouldn't trump be a larp?
I'll answer this since others aren't. The two most obvious ones are SA, Saudi Arabia, talking about the house coup days before it happened and LDR, rothschild family days before the very strange plane crash happened on their property.
Consider this a hostile corporate takeover. For any libertarians or conspiracy theorists on the fence about Trump, this is your proof. He's the only one in several generations who has come this far, and he had the ability to land several more seats in the fed in order to take over the board and nationalize it.
This is the correct strategy. Although what it looks like it's reeducation and PR, I think the end goal is demoralization of the reporters. Part of their efficacy as story advocates is based around a compartmentalized world view where they are exposed only to their peers in the news room, filled with successful people. But show them the direct nature of their end users and they suddenly mentally associate with them. They become losers.
I'm noticing how his eyes fail to constrict immediately after the lights come on, also his eyelids spelt blink and only halfway. Maybe on anti psychotics or speed.
God grants wishes
Passive aggressive behavior was a naturally learned behavior, resulting from their ability to reason being educated away. This is not a performance art, rather a disturbing disconnection of some vital synapse response in which the brain completely fails to see reality. This person is not intentionally lying, but believes what they say. The result is an overemphasis on emotional feedback, namely rage, sadness and fear. This person is giving you a rare example of how all 3 emotions can be triggered simultaneously.
I say let them riot. The building May cost a few million to repair. The marketing is priceless.
Why support the congressman who would vent his frustration in a public way. It's a weak move that signals to the left they are winning and that we have no other tools in our arsenal. We should all pray that not the case.
This was a weak move by the republican congressman. Why vent your frustration in such a public way? Should we just let them know that they're winning and that all that we have I'm our arsenal is name calling? By the way, all of the comments here are equally toothless and childish. Get it together people, this is going to be a long fight
Strange how someone who looks confounded at something so sime could also be responsible for so much. It's no wonder people presume there's a power behind the throne.