OP your link broke:
https://populist.press/sleepy-joes-live-feed-cut-again-at-just-the-right-time/
Apply the same principles to Gab that you are applying to Don Jr. and to everyone else was what I meant.
I have already demonstrated the difference between the two services, in plain English, several times now. Scroll up.
As far as our "conversation", you move the goalposts every time you reply.
Quote me, and debate the actual argument. In summary:
Conservatives who are straggling behind on the sinking ship that is Twitter and continue to post actual content to it are contributing to keeping it afloat.
Leave now, and watch that ship sink. Build a better ship elsewhere.
Trump is human and I simply described human nature.
Further, pointing out that a father loves his daughter is hardly debasement. In fact quite the opposite. Inter family diplomacy is a challenge and Trump is navigating it as well as could be expected.
If anything Trump should have dumped Kushner sooner, like he would have in a purely business setting, but did not because of his fatherly love and gentlemanly qualities.
I did read it. It described deaths with covid and an average of 2.6 other potentially fatal diseases. That category was the overwhelming majority of deaths because it included all manner of deaths from other causes that could be correlated to covid.
We don’t count a heart disease death who happened to have the flu as a flu death. So why are we doing it for covid?
Why were motorcycle accident deaths who happened to have covid counted as covid deaths?
Why were we using 40+ cycle PCR tests as disease diagnosis when that test is known to be unfit for that purpose with extraordinary high false positive rates?
Why did the CDC advise doctors to count any suspected case as an actual covid case?
Simple answer: Because there was an incentive to inflate covid case numbers and death counts.
Not a field of study I have spent much time on yet, but my understanding of the history was that while it did certainly occur, the commonly suggested death count figures have been greatly exaggerated.
If you can explain it a bit more or point to a good resource I’d like to learn whatever it is you know about it.
Whether Kushner is persuasive or not matters little when your target is your father in law. Fathers will do anything for their daughters, including tolerating the whims of their sons in law.
This is a common and predictable family dynamic.
Gab is a viable alternative for those looking to escape the clutches of the tyrannical technocrats.
It can be used anonymously, despite the fact that doing so does not scratch the narcissistic itch that most social media addicts seem to be plagued by.
The only way for you to truly know is to test it out yourself, make observations, and come to your own conclusions.
Good luck, I hope I was able to help.
Please explain the issue you’ve raised with my comment, which was nothing more than me repeating a figure reported by the CDC.
Covid deaths can either be caused by covid, or the deceased can have been diagnosed with covid and have died of some other cause, which also meets the criteria of a covid death, for some ridiculous treason.
94% percent were in the latter category, according to the CDC.
Now you are just trolling.
Don Jr. can promote himself wherever he chooses, but those choices have consequences.
By promoting himself on twitter, he legitimizes twitter as a viable service.
This is a mistake. Twitter is not a viable service.
You'll understand eventually. It takes time but everyone comes around to the inevitable conclusion, eventually.
You make a good point. This site's traffic surge was mostly fueled by the situational crisis of Trump's reelection, and the fraud surrounding it.
At this point, you really have to be a bit masochistic to continue coming here to see the constant barrage of negative news.
I'm still here because the bad news is just as important as the good news. I want to be informed, regardless of how rosy the information is, and this place delivers on that front.
I fail to see a scenario where Trump taking "necessary action" would have resulted in much other than a full on Deep State assault on him and his circle. People would have ended up "accidentally" dead and messages would have been sent.
The only real possibility of meaningful and lasting reform will come from the types of things that history has taught us are inevitable. The kinds of things we don't discuss on public websites.
You're moving the goalposts.
I am fine with posting on Twitter... As long as you are not posting actual content there, and therefore signaling to others that continuing the use of twitter is fine, and instead subverting it, soliciting all users to leave.
This is what Gab does, and it is a smart strategy. It is the only legitimate use of twitter if you are conservative. Anything else is helping twitter remain relevant, which is the antithesis of our goal.
Compare this to what some conservatives, like Don Jr. are doing on twitter, as they moan and gnash their teeth while stepping right back into the line of fine, seemingly ignorant of their abuser's contempt of their very existence.
They say naive things like "I am on the front lines fighting the fight in the enemy's territory" and similar to justify their gluttony for abuse. They can not see the forest through the trees and are effectively technological luddites clinging to misguided notions on what twitter actually is - namely state sponsored propaganda.
Harken back one year ago, when some here were perpetuating the delusion that Section 230 reform was going to save the day, and that forcing big tech to be nice to conservatives was a winning plan. Oh, the surety of their premise. They just knew the tables would turn any moment now.
I told those people they were wrong then and will continue to do it now. Fortunately though, the tide has mostly turned, in this community and abroad, and now I see a general consensus that my advice was sound. Others have become the evangelists for leaving those services, and parrot my exact message. I can't help but to be a little proud of my pedes for seeing the light there. It is better late than never and despite me doing a small "I told you so" I am very happy to see so many people waking up to the reality of the situation and have no further critique for them other than to avoid making the same mistakes again.
You'll get there too, eventually. There is no other viable solution.
When you can have a conversation IRL and revile in horror when the person you are talking to is still using Twitter, and they actually feel embarrassed for admitting they are still using it, then you'll know that we have won.
Exactly like how it went down with MySpace, Tumblr, 90's big hair and countless other fads.
No, content is not content in this context.
Content is something of substance that attracts a site visitor. A story. A photograph. A video.
By posting actual content to twitter, you legitimize it as a service. You elevate that service by way of contributing content that in turn generates clicks and therefore revenue for the service.
By posting actual content to twitter, you contribute to the problem.
Contrast this to using twitter solely to instruct twitter users to leave the service and cancel their accounts. This is the opposite of posting content. This equates to mutiny or subversion. Contribute zero actual content there.
This is the only legitimate use of the service, if you care about the information war.
Only post actual content to the alternate services. Make the alternate services the sole place to consume quality content.
This is the way. I can’t make it any more clear for you. Reread this as many times as it takes to parse.
I explained the difference already.
If you are posting actual content to twitter, you are contributing to more activity on that service. This helps them win.
If you are only using the service to promote the exodus, you are helping make the service irrelevant. This helps us win.
If you do anything in that service, make sure it is only the latter.
You are correct.
Every single person still using those services is contributing to the problem.
There is no other option, you must leave the service. They can not be rehabilitated, they will never tolerate you, and your continued participation not only helps the enemy, but also diminishes the allies.
The battle will be won when all the worthwhile content exists elsewhere, and Twitter becomes irrelevant. Do everything in your power to facilitate this, post haste.
The only remaining legitimate use of those services, for any stragglers who may have large audiences, is to broadcast the message for all of their followers to leave, and to provide a friendly link to the new destination.
That is it, it is quite simple. You're either part of the problem, or part of the solution.
Gab is not the sinking ship. Gab is the rising star.
Gab is not part of the state run mockingbird propaganda machine. Gab allows anonymous use. Gab does not require a phone number to join.
Gab the service is not conservative, it is a service that happens to have a predominantly conservative user base, and a conservative CEO.
Simply compare the terms of use for both services. They are wildly different in scope and principle.
Both services are ultimately tools. How one used the tool is important and goes far to determine the output. However not all tools are created equally and some tools have inherent flaws that limit their usefulness. Technology tools in particular can have serious flaws and resulting implications. Erosion of privacy, destruction of relationships, indoctrination of thought, and so on.
Yes, Twitter users should be ashamed. Just as those who shop with companies that utilize slave labor should feel shame. Or those who align themselves with other forms of evil.
You have been shown the light. Now chose wisely. If you fail, expect to feel a sense of shame. But do not expect me to run your nose in it. I understand the addiction component for social media junkies. I have compassion.
Which is why I bother helping educate those who will listen.
Social media is a scourge. Never allow the medium to control your relationships. Cultivate those relationships in real life. Use your tools wisely.