1
JaquesoCheese 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hickory dickory dock

The news says “bombs to drop!”

But when released,

The story stinks.

Hickory dickory dock.

1
JaquesoCheese 1 point ago +1 / -0

Regular US military would never do this. It would either be a CIA-type spook operation, or a navy SEAL-type guns blazing infiltration. The first of which we would never know about, and the second would never happen against an ally. This is a dumb larp.

5
JaquesoCheese 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it’s absolute horse shit that SCOTUS will only take the case if the total number of votes in question will change the winner. Shit like that is why election fraud doesn’t get caught and there’s no reform. They should do their fucking job and take the case based on merit, not based on how many it is. What if there are three separate cases that WOULD add up to be enough? Do they just ignore all three because each individual case wouldn't change the results?

1
JaquesoCheese 1 point ago +1 / -0

What? That makes no sense. We do not swear to a person or a rank or a title. It is to the Constitution. THEN we swear to follow orders from the President and out superior officers. But we are also obligated to ignore unconstitutional orders.

1
JaquesoCheese 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not when those orders are in conflict with the constitution. And this general’s statement is 100% correct.

0
JaquesoCheese 0 points ago +1 / -1

No we do not swear loyalty to the President. We swear to support and defend the Constitution, and are obligated to reject and report and orders which conflict with the Constitution. This is basic training 101. And this general’s statement is deserving of respect.

0
JaquesoCheese 0 points ago +1 / -1

It’s not insubordination. The oath of service is not to a person or a party, it’s to the Constitution. He is correct.

-1
JaquesoCheese -1 points ago +1 / -2

No, it actually shows him being LOYAL to his oath. The oath of service is not to a person or party. It is to the Constitution l.

1
JaquesoCheese 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is 100% correct and anyone who disagrees is uninformed or mentally retarded. The oath of service is NOT to a person or a party of even the country itself. It is to a DOCUMENT aka the constitution. Fuck anyone who demonizes somebody for upholding this oath.

“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God”

-1
JaquesoCheese -1 points ago +1 / -2

Then what exactly is the problem with Shapiro? I listen to him every day. He’s pro-conservatives and pro-Trump and anti-leftism. And you want what? An apology? Dude, he’s on our team.

-1
JaquesoCheese -1 points ago +3 / -4

He’s plainly said that he hopes Trump wins, but it’s an uphill climb. That’s objectively true. Y’all are just bitter towards anyone who didn’t jump on the Trump Train the moment he came down the escalator.

1
JaquesoCheese 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes. He supports Trump now, and has been for a long time. He criticizes the flaws and praises the wins, especially foreign policy.

6
JaquesoCheese 6 points ago +9 / -3

Same is true for Shapiro and his whole Daily Wire platform, but grouches around here still shit on him.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›