1
JayMW 1 point ago +1 / -0

Usually there's a whole different implication to a Japanese person being seen with a tentacle monster.

1
JayMW 1 point ago +1 / -0

His biggest problem is he's more concerned with being perceived as being in the center instead of just reporting the truth.

2
JayMW 2 points ago +2 / -0

The commie left can't relate to this. They don't have money.

1
JayMW 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for letting me know. I've heard this going around and thought that would be too flagrant even for Dems.

1
JayMW 1 point ago +1 / -0

Officers would already face charges of murder if they did indeed murder a restrained suspect. At best this is a redundancy. At worst it's trying to hinder what police officers could do to defend themselves or others.

2
JayMW 2 points ago +2 / -0

They must have put it back up because it's on there now.

1
JayMW 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was talking about excerpts like the one below.

"Turner drove a car into a crowd at a demonstration against police brutality and systemic racism Saturday"

The whole thing is kind of framed in a way where it's technically true, but gives a different impression on what happened. It also never says she was a BLM supporter either.

0
JayMW 0 points ago +1 / -1

I understand leftist lurkers are trying to get ammo on opponents, but if it can't be traced to you then leaking it will cause them to distrust each other. More so if you haven't been vocal about your views publicly.

36
JayMW 36 points ago +37 / -1

It is easier to pull lefties over when they think you're one of them. I think Tim would be less effective if he just came out as a hard line Trump supporter.

1
JayMW 1 point ago +3 / -2

I know forest fires now aren't nearly as bad as they were in the past, but could people just say it's because there are less forests now than at the start of the 20th century?

13
JayMW 13 points ago +13 / -0

I must be lucky. My wife wants to repeal the 19th, but until then she says she'll just double my vote.

4
JayMW 4 points ago +5 / -1

What do you mean packing it would get shot down by the SCOTUS? The Senate approves judicial appointments. SCOTUS wouldn't have a say in it.

14
JayMW 14 points ago +14 / -0

Razorfist did say to neuter the court, but also Republicans should stack it right now since they really have no reason not to.

4
JayMW 4 points ago +4 / -0

If he does vote with the conservatives then Trump will put another conservative judge in. That means Roberts loses his swing vote status and becomes nothing.

-3
JayMW -3 points ago +1 / -4

The Democrats really missed out on an opportunity by selecting prison labor Harris over Gabbard for VP. With her on the ticket they probably would have pulled a lot of centrists and Democrats who've defected to Trump.

2
JayMW 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't even have to teach patriotism. Just stop teaching the anti-American garbage they're doing now and start teaching real American history. Kids will come to the conclusion that America is a pretty great place.

1
JayMW 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be best just to focus on the mailed ballots being unreliable and focus less on fraud.

3
JayMW 3 points ago +3 / -0

/pol needs to start developing dossiers on Antifa and BLM members starting with leaders.

3
JayMW 3 points ago +3 / -0

I live just outside of Portland and met my wife online. I didn't want any lefty women so I just put my politics in my bio. I figure if I find a woman that's okay with my politics then that's a good start. Turns out she thought the same and put her politics in her profile too.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›