Give me a break,

They were sealing bins of ballots up. So they were "pretending" to stop the count. The SoS even showed it on the video as he was trying to cover a different lie.

Wording seems suspicious. Too much emphasis on Trump actually winning

I live in NE Georgia

Saying observers were not told to leave in GA video is laughable. So, 30 people including the media packed up and left at the same time, for no apparent reason? That is what we are expected to believe? And all return around the same time.

Any "explanation" from the office of GA SoS is not to be trusted.

Moved it off of their front page after getting savaged.

OMG, this woman was friggin awesome.

DESTROYED EVIDENCE IN GEORGIA? In the recent case of Phillips v. Harmon, The Supreme Court of Georgia held that the duty to preserve evidence arises when litigation is reasonably foreseeable to the party in control of that evidence, even if the party is not on notice of a potential claim. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ga-supreme-court/1705967.html

DESTROYED EVIDENCE IN GEORGIA? In the recent case of Phillips v. Harmon, The Supreme Court of Georgia held that the duty to preserve evidence arises when litigation is reasonably foreseeable to the party in control of that evidence, even if the party is not on notice of a potential claim. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ga-supreme-court/1705967.html

Wow! That is an amazing feat to come up with that BS. The Fox Election Desk Head, is a strident LIB/DEM. He called Arizona.

DESTROYED EVIDENCE IN GEORGIA? In the recent case of Phillips v. Harmon, however, the Supreme Court of Georgia held that the duty to preserve evidence arises when litigation is reasonably foreseeable to the party in control of that evidence, even if the party is not on notice of a potential claim. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ga-supreme-court/1705967.html

DESTROYED EVIDENCE IN GEORGIA? In the recent case of Phillips v. Harmon, however, the Supreme Court of Georgia held that the duty to preserve evidence arises when litigation is reasonably foreseeable to the party in control of that evidence, even if the party is not on notice of a potential claim. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ga-supreme-court/1705967.html

DESTROYED EVIDENCE IN GEORGIA? In the recent case of Phillips v. Harmon, however, the Supreme Court of Georgia held that the duty to preserve evidence arises when litigation is reasonably foreseeable to the party in control of that evidence, even if the party is not on notice of a potential claim.

DESTROYED EVIDENCE IN GEORGIA? In the recent case of Phillips v. Harmon, however, the Supreme Court of Georgia held that the duty to preserve evidence arises when litigation is reasonably foreseeable to the party in control of that evidence, even if the party is not on notice of a potential claim.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ga-supreme-court/1705967.html

Go to 32.03 of the video.

You could have saved a lot of typing if you would have simply stated, "I don't know what the fuck I am talking about".

Go to 32:03 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abOlWzx_h9A

you got the image posted :)

i had the same issue

use https://maga.host/

add the image link to your post

EXACTLY

haha, I know, right? The musical genius that went into that song is absolutely mind blowing.

That YouTube link, I obtained it from: https://hereistheevidence.com/ Go there and you will find links to the other video testimonies. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCekdKDk6d8opUrUEXtXD4XQ/videos

That YouTube link, I obtained it from: https://hereistheevidence.com/ Go there and you will find links to the other video testimonies.

That YouTube link, I obtained it from: https://hereistheevidence.com/ Go there and you will find links to the other video testimonies.

She is a Democrat. Waste of effort trying to reach her to do something she would laugh at.